DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.
N/A
Madison Logic Platform
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
The Madison Logic Platform is an account-based marketing product that includes an ABM-centric data management platform (DMP) that allows users to target ads and other content on an account basis. Activate ABM integrates with the user's CRM and Marketing Automation platforms, and leverages the vendor's network of 1,600+ B2B publishers for content syndication.
N/A
Pricing
DemandScience
Madison Logic Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DemandScience
Madison Logic Platform
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DemandScience
Madison Logic Platform
Considered Both Products
DemandScience
Verified User
Professional
Chose DemandScience
I personally prefer the Madison Logic Platform over the DemandScience Activate program. This is mainly due to the fact that I like their platform better and it is very easy to use. However, from a performance standpoint, the DemandScience Activate leads perform well and are …
I would say it is similar to Madison Logic when it comes to the quality of leads and customer service. We are yet to see results coming from GumGum's contextual approach but from a content syndication perspective they are one of the more reliable ones out there, especially for …
All vendors have their strengths and weaknesses. Due to the scale of activity we do on behalf of our clients, we tend to always use a basket of vendors to deliver the lead volumes we require. DemandScience is always on the preferred partner list and will thus be considered for …
We chose DemandScience because we had heard good things about them and liked the content they produced. I would say that DemandScience is less advanced or mature than these other two. The other two have capabilities that either ensure quality or help us nurture the lead to a …
I evaluate other products as having a similar standing as DemandScience Activate in terms of quality and value. It seems difficult to differentiate from other competitors at this time. I chose to work with them as I typically work with a variety of vendors over a period of time …
Demand Science did deliver the quantity of leads without issue. The data for a few was not accurate (bounced when following up). But they agreed to make good by providing substitute leads to meet the quota. Towards the end of my project, they lost a few folks, and so the end of my campaign got a little rough as they were taking over some assignments midway. But we ultimately completed the SOW. I will say that the leads did not perform well in our email cadence - none converted. However, this was a test of the concept for us. Content syndication had a lower cost per qualified lead than some other tactics, so we tested it. Your results may vary, based on your follow-up and your market.
In the past few years, I've worked with several content syndication service providers. And the industry has progressed significantly. I'm happy to say that this year's lead quality is especially good! Our ABM program has very strict standards, and the team adheres to those requirements. Team members who are always quick to respond. Willing to swap out stale leads. They're a definite must-see!
The initial pitch and contact from Mason used "show me you know me" well, which we felt was a good sign of company culture and approach to database marketing.
Delivery of leads was ahead of schedule.
They set expectations, and then delivered what they said they would.
The leads matched our criteria as agreed.
Regular check ins and catch ups, and patience when thing were taking a bit of time to get sorted here.
We would like to see more proactive communication on what's working and what's not without requiring a meeting - regular reporting cadence to assess asset quality
A dashboard view might be nice as well, again, so we can look at an asset and see how it's performing (or if it isn't) without having to wait on a rep to pull a report or schedule a walkthrough
Our executives decided to not renew because we were not seeing the ROI they were looking for. However, our executives did not make the best decisions on the data Demand Science provided.
The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
Our rep is always available and quickly responds to any question we have. I haven't worked with other partners who are as proactive and excited to help us as our DemandScience rep is. He reaches out with new ideas and suggestions frequently. They are happy to make any changes needed to the campaigns and make those changes quickly and efficiently. They work well with our execution agency, but are also happy to meet with us directly to provide insights and support.
I've not used another content syndication company, and I probably won't after the lack of results we've had. I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling a specific product or software and how this could be beneficial, but I'd steer away from it for services.
Madison Logic Platform is used specifically at my organization for tracking campaigns run through them. Tableau is more of a company-wide platform used to track all demand generation performance. I personally like the Madison Logic Platform because it is easy to use, and the support I have received from the Madison Logic team has been amazing.