DocuSign CLM vs. Thomson Reuters HighQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DocuSign CLM
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
DocuSign CLM, formerly SpringCM, is a cloud-based platform that can be used to manage documents, contracts and related collateral. The solution includes workflows that can be tailored to an organization's business processes. It is also designed to accelerate team collaboration. SpringCM was acquired by DocuSign in the summer of 2018.
$15
per month
HighQ
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
HighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A
Pricing
DocuSign CLMThomson Reuters HighQ
Editions & Modules
Personal
$15
per month
Real Estate Starter
$15
per month
DocuSign for Realtors
$35
per user/per month
Standard
$40
per user/per month
Business Pro
$60
per user/per month
Starter
$75
per month
Intermediate
$450
per month
Advanced Solutions
Contact sales team
Real Estate Plus, Broker Edition
Contact sales team
Sandbox Account
Free
Enterprise Offerings
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DocuSign CLMHighQ
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DocuSign CLMThomson Reuters HighQ
Features
DocuSign CLMThomson Reuters HighQ
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
7.5
1 Ratings
7% below category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
-
Ratings
Contract creation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract templates8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided logic6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
7.6
1 Ratings
7% below category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
-
Ratings
Contract sharing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract editing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Approval process8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
8.3
1 Ratings
1% above category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
-
Ratings
Contract database8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract search7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom contract reports8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Tracking contract status9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance check10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
8.2
2 Ratings
4% above category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
-
Ratings
Contract Storage8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced Search and Filtering8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Contract Templates8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Acceleration9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
E-Signatures9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Reminders and Alerts8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with other Systems8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.2
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
Search00 Ratings9.62 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.6
2 Ratings
8% above category average
Chat00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
9.4
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Versioning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
Advanced security features00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DocuSign CLMThomson Reuters HighQ
Small Businesses
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 9.6 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 8.7 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.7 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DocuSign CLMThomson Reuters HighQ
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(37 ratings)
9.2
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
DocuSign CLMThomson Reuters HighQ
Likelihood to Recommend
DocuSign
DocuSign is useful for collecting electronic signatures on isolated documents and packets that are administered separately or integrated into another system. DocuSign is integrated into our onboarding system, Paylocity, which is where the employee completes all onboarding tasks required for employment. Integrating DocuSign with Paylocity allows us to send documents that require more than one signature along with other onboarding tasks, which makes for a less confusing onboarding experience for the worker. DocuSign also allows us to automatically run E-Verify from the integrated Form I-9 Document, which saves us lots of time onboarding each employee.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
Read full review
Pros
DocuSign
  • Alerts when documents are signed
  • Notifications if customers don't complete any or all of their required tasks
  • Showing clients exactly where to sign
  • Making signing easy and fast
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
  • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
  • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
Read full review
Cons
DocuSign
  • Increase sending limit for initial plans
  • Faster return for client service requests
  • When correcting a document, no new email is sent for notification of an update. The clients have to go back to the old document, and it feels uncomfortable for them.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
Read full review
Support Rating
DocuSign
I am constantly experiencing issues with SpringCM.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
DocuSign
DocuSign CLM has a much improved user experience compared to similar products we have used. The streamlining of templates and traceability through the signing process are huge benefits, and better than competitors. The ability to set up designated templates for different use-case scenarios, and roll out efficient documents for signing, is invaluable, as well as other functions like Bulk Send and PowerForms.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
DocuSign
  • Positive - has helped us track renewals which allows us to get out of "bad" contracts or renew "good" ones.
  • Negative - we had hoped for it to help us determine which terms and conditions we have agreed to in other contracts. This has made contract review remain a lengthy process.
  • Positive - We are now able to find all of our contracts which has helped us get out of unnecessary contracts (which positively impacts finances).
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
  • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
  • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
Read full review
ScreenShots