The emfluence Marketing Platform is a marketing automation platform featuring drag-and-drop email editors and automated campaign builders, simple social media scheduling, manageable landing pages, workflow management, analytics, website tracking, surveys, and modals. The platform works for B2B and B2C marketers, marketing agencies, and CRM providers. The product supports CRM integrations and an open API for custom integrations. emfluence offers digital marketing consulting…
$1,000
per month
Metadata.io
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Based in San Francisco, Metadata.io is a Demand Generation and ABM platform designed to execute thousands of B2B campaigns in a matter of hours, automatically optimizing campaigns for pipeline impact at a high velocity.
$24,000
per year
Pricing
emfluence Marketing Platform
Metadata.io
Editions & Modules
Up to 30,000 Active Emails
$1,000
per month
Up to 150,000 Active Emails
$2,000
per month
Up to 500,000 Active Emails
$4,100
per month
More than 1,000,000 Active Emails
Custom
per month
MetaMatch
$295
per month per installation
Web Personalization
$24,000
per year
Audience Targeting
$24,000
per year
Metadata Base Platform
$60,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
emfluence Marketing Platform
Metadata.io
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
$3,100 one-time fee per installation
$2,500 one-time fee per installation
Additional Details
The emfluence Marketing Platform offers month-to-month pricing that’s based on the number of contacts added, with no restrictions on how many emails are sent each month or by which features are used.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
emfluence Marketing Platform
Metadata.io
Features
emfluence Marketing Platform
Metadata.io
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
emfluence Marketing Platform
8.4
6 Ratings
10% above category average
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG email editor
9.16 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic content
8.66 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
8.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Landing pages
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B testing
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization
7.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
9.16 Ratings
00 Ratings
List management
8.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
emfluence Marketing Platform
8.1
5 Ratings
4% above category average
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Lead nurturing automation
9.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality management
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
emfluence Marketing Platform
8.4
3 Ratings
13% above category average
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Calendaring
8.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
8.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
emfluence Marketing Platform
8.4
3 Ratings
13% above category average
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Social sharing and campaigns
8.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social profile integration
8.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
emfluence Marketing Platform
6.7
6 Ratings
9% below category average
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Dashboards
9.16 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
3.76 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
The reporting feature is not as detailed as we require for our documentation, so we have to organize the results into charts and graphs. For every other component of our social media and digital marketing, emfluence checks all of the boxes.
Metadata is well suited when you have a really large ad budget (>50k per month at least). This is because the power of metadata lies in the ability to quickly set up and run a large number of experiments (combinations of channel, audience, creative, and conversion assets). To evaluate these variations, all of them need a large number of impressions, clicks, and conversions to be statistically relevant. If your budget is smaller, you will either have a very small number of experiments (not fully utilizing the power of metadata), or your experiments will not have enough clicks to make informed decisions. We had expected a better explanation of this from metadata before signing up.
I do have issues sometimes when making a website popup. I specify certain measurements of my popup yet when it shows up on my website, the graphic doesn't adjust and I have a bunch of white space. But that could also be my website.
When adding a new contact into the contact section, once you hit save, the contact information stays on the screen instead of an empty contact profile so you can immediately add the next person.
Sometimes when I update a template, The unsubscribe link will link to my email address instead of the person the email is being sent to.
If you don't have a large budget and audience it's hard to meaningfully optimize. If I have 4 ad creatives, to 2 audience groups on FB and LinkedIn, that creates 16 experiments, each of which needs an ample enough budget, say $40/day, that's now $640 per day or $19K per month.
Limited ability to edit ads after they've been launched. You usually have to stop the ad, clone it, and launch a new campaign.
Can't add new ads to existing campaigns which limits the ability to optimize. If I start an MD campaign with 4 ads, and in a few weeks we see that one is working well and the other 2 are not performing, I can pause those (or it can autopause by rules), but I can't add 2 more new creatives to the mix against the high performer. I'd have to either stop the high performer, and recreate it in a new campaign (losing likes and comments), OR - leave the high performer in the first campaign, and create. a second campaign with the new ones, which will only optimize against each other.
Limited to a single conversion event on a landing page. I'm not able to choose either a Demo Request OR a Sign-Up conversion, I can only choose one.
Google search ads are doable but aren't necessarily more feature-rich or easy-to use than native, so there's no value added to doing it through Metadata in my opinion aside from unifying ad reporting.
They were the only company that could solve our specific problems. When we looked at larger companies like Constant Contact, they weren't as capable at handling our specific needs for a reasonable price. Some companies need to charge us programming hours. Bigger companies couldn't help our issue. emfluence is more flexible.
We chose [Metadata.io] because it was a smaller company and could get more personalized attention. The price was better and they seemed more eager to support us. The feature set was what we were looking for and not more - it was exactly as robust as we needed it to be. Didn't want to pay for features we weren't going to use.
Huge decrease in CPLs, CPMQL and Cost Per Opportunity
Big improvement in MQL to SQL rates
90%+ of our leads from paid social now have valid business emails, before it was like 30%
Saving us hundreds of hours over the course of the next year doing daily manual optimization and budget management tasks for us so we can focus on strategy and testing new things