Endeca was a business intelligence platform for analyzing unstructured data, acquired by Oracle and since discontinued.
N/A
Zoho Analytics
Score 8.4 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Zoho Analytics is a self-service BI and analytics platform that uncovers patterns, spots emerging trends, tracks business metrics, and detects anomalies. Designed for ease of use, it enables business users to create reports and dashboards independently, without relying on IT.
$60
per month Starts at 5 Users
Pricing
Endeca (discontinued)
Zoho Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard
$60
per month Starts at 5 Users
Premium
$145
per month Starts at 15 Users
Enterprise
$575
per month Starts at 50 Users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Endeca (discontinued)
Zoho Analytics
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
There is a 20% discount for all plans if subscribed yearly. Customers can buy add-on rows and users, in addition to the plans listed above.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Endeca (discontinued)
Zoho Analytics
Considered Both Products
Endeca (discontinued)
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Endeca (discontinued)
Endeca is brilliant for setting up simple and straightforward search platforms that utilise only basic search rules. On the other hand, Apache Solr supports far more complex search platform implementations, including multi-index search. Overall, I would say Solr is far more …
Oracle Endeca was the best option that we evaluated by far. It gave us the most flexibility and ability to meet our objectives and had features that were not offered by the competing products we evaluated, but which we very much wanted, and this was why we decided to go with …
Endeca is much better than ATG for searching ATG's catalog.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Endeca (discontinued)
Solr - pros: opensource costs / cons: limited developer tooling
Adobe AEM - pros: experience management tooling for business users / cons: limited functionality around search.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Endeca (discontinued)
Endeca is at the same level with largest enterprise search providers. However, it does surpass them in the ability to fine tune and customize search configuration.
The Endeca stack is a good solution to solve a plethora of data problems but its value has to merit its cost. Overall, it provides a better solution than most products out there. It requires an initial technical investment to get the solution going but once this is achieved you …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Endeca (discontinued)
Compared to ElasticSearch, Endeca has many out-of the box features that you'll have to code yourself if you're using ElasticSearch. Also, Endeca is a commercial-grade solution, ElasticSearch is still probably in the startup category, although they are gaining traction rapidly.
I described it earlier. Again, Solr is much simpler to learn, use and develop, much more intuitive. As an open source resource, Solr is a great tool. And because of adoption by IBM WebSphere Commerce, the decision to abandon Endeca is easy.
We used Endeca in conjunction w/ Blue Martini to run our estore. In comparison, Endeca was much easier to use and provided higher results.
Zoho Analytics
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Zoho Analytics
Zoho Analytics has the best UI and user friendly to create reports and dashboard along with features like Zia Assistance that guide in creating reports and dashboard and also help in the forecasting of the data based on the past records.
Compared to Qlik BI, Power BI, and Tableau, Zoho is a very economical option. It still manages to perform and proves to serve on par with the other mentioned software. It only lacks popularity, which is why not many people are using it. Zoho Analytics is a solid option for BI.
Our team, which is just one decision-maker for this kind of thing, evaluated the different offerings and presented us with the options. I'm sure he considered more than the three above, but I remember him talking about those 3. He explained what he thought would be best and …
Looker is more of a database. Build your own customization data sets and reporting. At the same time, Looker's forecasting tool seems more accurate. I like Zoho's visual analytics of the data more. Zoho is better for presenting the data to others, while Looker is more raw data, …
Zoho Analytics is more user-friendly than Sisense. It offers an intuitive, drag-and-drop interface that makes it easier for non-technical users to create reports and dashboards. Additionally, its pricing is highly competitive compared to Sisense, making it a more cost-effective …
The cost for the functionality is considerably lower than the other tools that I considered. While the other tools offer advanced functionality above anything Zoho Offers - I do not require the advanced features that would justify the additional investment
Since we use Zoho Forms, it's way easier for us to integrate Zoho Analytics with Zoho Forms. We can easily connect Zoho Forms as a data source and setup a chart view without any unecessary manual intervention.
Besides using analytics, we’ve used spreadsheets like Excel to observe data and play with it. That’s good, but it lacks many of the visualization, access, and security functions that analytics provides for our team. Zoe does a great job of scalability and is definitely much …
Over 5 years ago, I started down a path to use Tableau as an analytics tool and quickly became dismayed--- it was hard enough to translate all the entity relationships from Zoho CRM and Zoho Desk (and software we used before that) into Tableau. Even worse, as an agile small …
While Tableau may have more versatility and visual appeal, it requires the addition of a database to store all the data you want to report on, is more complex to get setup and working correctly, and is also more expensive overall. Zoho Analytics is an all in one package …
Other Analytic softwares doesn't provide half of the features that Zoho Analytics provides, and they are not that cheap too, Making custom reports seems very easy in Zoho Analytics but found hard in other software's, and UI is easy to understand, Also Zoho Analytics provide all …
It's much better to use Zoho Analytics than Google Sheets because the reports are much more scalable, don't crash, and load faster. The only thing we miss about Google Sheets was how easy it was to write custom formulas -- Zoho Analytics's custom formula building could be a …
Due to multiple features and more customizable dashboards, you can make which are not present in other platforms which I have compared during purchase time. Even further you can format the dashboard as per your choice which is another best features since we have to share our …
The integration functionality was so much slicker with Zoho Analytics. They've made it easy to reach out to 3rd party apps as well as other Zoho apps to bring the data all into one place.
There are many relevant features available in the other competitors product, but the uniqueness with Zoho Analytics it has lot of custom reports, and various chart/graph at its own scale.
Head Industry Institute Initiatives/Training and Placement Officer
Chose Zoho Analytics
Zoho Analytics is better in form of costing and pricing. The package is cheaper. The firm being large, small cap or mid cap, Zoho Analytics can help them provide accurate analytics and details. Customized graphical representation can be created which is easy to understand and …
We used Yellowfin for 1 year and it really doesn't compare to Zoho Analytics because it doesn't have the native integration with ManageEngine's tools and the customization is more technical, Zoho Analytics lets you create dashboards automatically, immediately when you connect …
Best fit for this product: - Advanced or Sophisticated Enterprise Search platform: If you spend effort on your search capabilities, Endeca is the tool. - If you are looking for capabilities to search and navigate similar to a relational-database system, then Endeca is not the best fit. - If you are spending effort to drive customer experience, especially around customer interaction with your web application, Endeca can help with that in a multichannel environment.
Zoho Analytics is the best way to consume data created by Zoho products . It's robust and quick build formula libraries and auto generated reports. A data source can be integrated and be ready for consumption within minutes. This gives a well developed baseline for organizing to develop advance analytics. It's mobile dashboards are very intuitive and useful for leaders who are on the move.
Provides exact, correct counts of items in its dimensions.
Allows for flexible, out-of-the-box boosting of content (based on combo of any/all of: user profile, date, dimension being browsed and search keyword).
It has a reasonably good admin interface for the administration of boosting/promotion rules for the business user.
Zoho Analytics’ predictive analytics capabilities can help forecast future trends, allowing for proactive planning and risk management.
Performance Monitoring: We can track key performance indicators (KPIs) across departments, such as sales, marketing, finance, and HR. This aids in identifying bottlenecks and areas for improvement.
For the most part, it is quite intuitive, however, you need to have an intermediate knowledge of HTML to be able to construct unique promotional web pages. Nowadays, with WordPress and other content management systems that have WYSIWYG interfaces, Endeca may prove to be challenging to HTML beginners.
I'm guessing it's out there somewhere but I really could have used a 'quick start guide' or guided start.
Once I figured it out, it makes sense how to make sure the right data is provided in order to make dashboards quite flexible--- but without examples, I found it quite a challenge
The initial organization of Analytics is NOT intuitive. Once in context, the organizational features make sense, but (at least initially) it would have been most useful if the organization of Analytics reports in Zoho Analytics had saved me a lot of time.
If the solution is implemented well and the business understands the purpose of the Endeca stack, it offers a great way for a business to explore and benefit from its existing data. From my experience, the Endeca solution has exposed data patterns to a business that were not thought about or explored before because of the lack of available tools to properly expose these patterns
Usefulness: I find Zoho Analytics highly useful for our data analysis needs. Its features, such as data visualization, reporting capabilities, and integration options, greatly aid our business and analytical processes. Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly and intuitive, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise. Reliability: We trust Zoho Analytics to deliver consistent and reliable performance. The platform's stability and uptime contribute positively to our overall experience.
The system itself is very usable, and with proper training is very sensible in its organization and method of operation. There are some downsides in initial setup in the way things are imported (or not in some cases) in setting up properties and dimensions. Overall however it's amazingly flexible in terms of the content it can index and make available for search.
For an end user, Zoho Analytics is pretty easy to use and very easy to access the dashboard. Linking data from multiple sources is very convenient. Multiple people can work on preparing and publishing the dashboards simultaneously, which helps delegate tasks.
ZOHO is a very reliable company/product. We never had any issues with downtime or inaccessibility to our data. Any type of maintenance that they had to perform was clearly communicated and never an issue. We use a lot of external hooks and we've never had any issues with getting ZOHO to communicate with any of those hooks.
ZOHO has obviously invested a lot of time effort and money in to creating a reliable infrastructure with high availability. We've never had any issues with performance and all of our data crunching small to large has always been well within reason. We have come to appreciate the performance of ZOHO and will continue to use it for all of our data needs.
Support has been very good, and the trainers for the various Endeca courses have all been very willing to help long after the classes have been completed, so in the instances where we're waiting on support from Oracle, it's often that the members of their training arm can help us out as well.
The support team is honestly not that great. At times, it seems as if members of our own team know more about the product than the support team. They must not have a lot of training or the turnaround is quick
The training is actually really good, and absolutely necessary - although this is software that has great documentation, the documentation itself is so vast, that it would be difficult to learn haphazardly, not to mention being incredibly time consuming to do so. Online training probably would have been fine except for the fact that having someone look over your shoulder to see where you're going wrong is helpful. This also allowed our team to sit in a single room and converse about functionality, etc. that would have been difficult to facilitate via an online class.
We did some online Q&A with the Oracle team, but I would definitely recommend doing an in person class if you have a large team that will be attending - there's definitely no replacements for a large class of technically oriented staff members who can drive conversation about specific topics that might surface.
There were some features we were hoping to get implemented in this particular release of Endeca, but were unable to facilitate those requirements due mostly to timeline. Having seen several other implementations, we will definitely have future iterations to add functionality and improve upon our implementation of Endeca. For the time being, we are satisfied with our implementation as it turned out.
If your external data sources are previously organized and correlated (e.g.: in your datawarehouse or database) your implementation will be easier. Of cource some not previously predicted correlation would be necessary to be done during the implementation, but if your organization let it to be all done into Zoho Analytics, it will take more time from your team.
Endeca is brilliant for setting up simple and straightforward search platforms that utilise only basic search rules. On the other hand, Apache Solr supports far more complex search platform implementations, including multi-index search. Overall, I would say Solr is far more powerful than Endeca.
Zoho Analytics has the best UI and user friendly to create reports and dashboard along with features like Zia Assistance that guide in creating reports and dashboard and also help in the forecasting of the data based on the past records.
The system appears to handle large data volumes from different platforms and present the information in a standard format. While the information is helpful, the insight and analytics are very interesting and provide a return on investment. The next part is how the users use that data insight to make decisions.
It is a searching tool, and hard to estimate its impact on conversion.
It does its job regarding better searching; In terms of efficiency, it's hard to say: it has big learning curve. It requires a dedicated Endeca developer to work on it.
Zoho Analytics has dramatically impacted the time we spend creating reports. We probably save 20+ hours per month.
Due to the tight integration with the rest of the Zoho platform, we don't have to manually import data; it just shows up for us.
Having some of these reports in our pocket is great when the owner wants to see something, and we're not in the office. I love the mobile app and the ability to see reports on the phone.