Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epicor Kinetic
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Epicor Kinetic is a customizable, scalable, product-centric cloud ERP designed specifically for manufacturers.N/A
FlexGen 4
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score 5.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A
Pricing
Epicor KineticFlexGen 4Microsoft Dynamics SL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor KineticFlexGen 4Microsoft Dynamics SL
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor KineticFlexGen 4Microsoft Dynamics SL
Considered Multiple Products
Epicor Kinetic
Chose Epicor Kinetic
A more well rounded and manufacturing focused platform
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Smaller player in ERP but meets the needs of the company
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Viewpoint is our current ERP provider, but they pushed all of their customers to the cloud (which we didn't want to do). They also pushed all customers to a single product with a corresponding significant increase in price, while not providing additional value to our company. …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
It was much easier to customize the software to what we wanted and we had more freedom to make the software exactly what we needed it to be. They gave us a lot more tools for development. They didn't restrict certain data transfer between screens or between modules. The support …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Kinetic is a more stable platform, and the company truly cares about its customers. they treat us like family.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
More variability and reporting use case scenarios offered.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Very different but seems just as capable for the manufacturing industry.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
NetSuite ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 and IBM Managed Services for SAP Applications
Chose Epicor Kinetic
More sophisticated and capable. We like the constant R&D and innovation and feel good it's going to be around for a while.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Epicor Kinetic allowing us to have the option of on-premise OR in the cloud was a big reason why we chose Epicor Kinetic. We also found the ability to customize and enhance Epicor Kinetic's screens, business processes, BAQs, and other features much more user friendly for our …
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Our system was a homegrown system
Chose Epicor Kinetic
We have been using Epicor Kinetic since 2014, I don't have a list of other products.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Ease of use and the ability of the system to adapt to our manufacturing processes and make our lives easier while giving us an upgrade in the system throughout the business.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Acumatica, Plex by Rockwell Automation, Infor CloudSuite ERP and NetSuite ERP
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Although we felt Acumatica would meets our needs as well, Epicor Kinetic was more cost effective to us as a small company.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
I wasn't the decider on the purchase but I have been told that it was vetted and chosen due to the robustness of the program and the ability to add in customizations.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
In my opinion, Epicor Kinetic better with manufacturing
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Most of my histories with SAP directly. I didn't really have any negative experiences. The only thing I could say is that I always had to go to somebody else to solve the problem that I can solve first person now with Epicor Kinetic.
Chose Epicor Kinetic
Epicor Kinetic is good for complex manufacturing, but is missing some basic ERP functions like GL entry approval workflows.
FlexGen 4

No answer on this topic

Microsoft Dynamics SL
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew.
We did try Great …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
MIP is a more robust product with more comprehensive modules that is tailored toward a non-profit accounting environment. The reporting and GL analysis features on MIP is also a lot more robust than Dynamics SL and the interface within MIP is designed to tailor to user needs. …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
Different class. Microsoft Dynamics SL isn't modern in design or interface.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
Dynamics SL provides built in complex project accounting flexibility with the benefit to accommodate additional complexity with customization tools to enhance the system capabilities and fill requirement gaps either as to process, reporting, or controls.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I have been on this product for 17 years. I have worked with Great Plains and have worked with products in the Health Care industry and believe this product pulls in all the main functionality into basic core modules and allows users to quickly grasp how to use the product. …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
They were both pretty easy to use, but I started using Microsoft Dynamics SL so it was a matter of knowing and becoming familiar with this program first. I became very accustomed to the modules and how to navigate the program.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I have used QuickBooks when I was in college and I did enjoy it mainly because that was my first experience with an accounting product like that. I did not switch to Microsoft Dynamics; it was the product used in the first company I received a job in. Although I did not select …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
QuickBooks is not a bad solution, but it is typically used by smaller companies since it is not a true, auditable accounting system. Dynamics is much more robust than QuickBooks and handles complex accounting much better.

FinancialForce may be a good option if you are looking …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
QuickBooks is a good entry point software. Dynamics is the next logical progression in a company's growth. Dynamics SL will allow for rapid growth and provide the necessary controls that QuickBooks is lacking.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I have evaluated many competitive products in the past. Dynamics Nav, Mass90, Dynamics GP, Platinum and others. This product is ahead in TCO and flexibility. Since the customization uses standard Microsoft tools (VBA, Visual Studio, and MS SQLServer, Object Model) it is much …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
I would love to have the Quorum product for our company; it is what the future-focused players in the industry are using.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
SL is lacking in various places for a direct sales type of company plan. Currently, we are looking into other options and have decided on Microsoft Dynamics AX as a solution. The move to AX will allow us to keep ordering in one system instead of two (right now we are forcing SL …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We used Connectwise, which did a good job costing function, but had to be periodically integrated and lacked some reporting capability.
We looked at GP but it does not have good project accounting, so it was not a good fit for our company.
We looked at NAV but there was too much …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We selected Dynamics SL because our business lives and dies by the success of our projects. A product that can tell you that you have a problem before you invoice, helps you get your project back on track much better. It's also much easier to evaluate across projects, tasks and …
Features
Epicor KineticFlexGen 4Microsoft Dynamics SL
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
Ratings
6% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
Ratings
14% above category average
Pay calculation8.20 Ratings00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.10 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.50 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.0
Ratings
6% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
API for custom integration8.30 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Plug-ins7.70 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.4
Ratings
0% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Single sign-on capability8.80 Ratings00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.10 Ratings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
Ratings
2% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Dashboards7.20 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Standard reports7.40 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Custom reports8.10 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.3
Ratings
5% below category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
Ratings
8% below category average
Accounts payable8.70 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable8.60 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support7.80 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.20 Ratings00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.60 Ratings00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.10 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.00 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
Ratings
33% below category average
Inventory tracking8.00 Ratings00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering7.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management7.70 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.3
Ratings
5% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Pricing8.40 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Order entry8.30 Ratings00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.60 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold8.10 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.80 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.5
Ratings
12% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
Ratings
27% below category average
Billing Management7.80 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.70 Ratings00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.90 Ratings00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Period Close8.20 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
Ratings
19% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
Ratings
47% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting9.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Project Costing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Cost Capture10.00 Ratings00 Ratings2.10 Ratings
Capital Project Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance9.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition9.00 Ratings00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.7
Ratings
10% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling7.70 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers7.10 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools7.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
Ratings
6% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
Ratings
17% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management8.50 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.0
Ratings
13% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared7.50 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring7.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository7.70 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated7.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management7.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.8
Ratings
15% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.10 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management7.70 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments7.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection8.50 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.70 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
Ratings
9% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management7.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
Ratings
6% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
22% below category average
Production Process Design7.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management8.20 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution7.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs7.70 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.1
Ratings
11% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
Ratings
19% below category average
Forecasting7.10 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning7.70 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring7.80 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
Ratings
7% above category average
FlexGen 4
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Proposal Management8.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Epicor KineticFlexGen 4Microsoft Dynamics SL
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Epicor KineticFlexGen 4Microsoft Dynamics SL
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
1.4
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Epicor KineticFlexGen 4Microsoft Dynamics SL
Likelihood to Recommend
Epicor Kinetic has been a wonderful system of record that I can rely on for consistent tracking of our quote to cash transactions. I have complete confidence in the data that is being processed at the Core of the Epicor Kinetic system. Customizing Epicor Kinetic has been a true game changer for us to allow our team to maximize the unique needs of our customers, vendors and users.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In the service series, there is a weakness in applying revenue recognition concepts which are a strong point of the project series. It is difficult to get a period sensitive WIP that could be recreated at any time for a point in time (fiscal period).
Read full review
Pros
  • When compared to the Smart Client, grids and searching are so much faster.
  • As a developer, the way that the forms are laid out in Application Studio in an easy to read way is fantastic
  • Having Epicor Kinetic forms load in a browser window is good. Being able to right click on the menu path and choose 'Open in new tab' is awesome.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • Ability to add companies, and sub-accounts on the fly allows for the growth of the system without conversions, and flexible reporting allows for the quick utilization of the data.
  • Multi-Company allows for easy and automated data entry and reporting across multiple legal entities and business segments.
  • Multi-Company also allows for easy centralization of business processes (AP check writing and Fixed Assets for example), while spreading data entry across the enterprise.
  • Ability to Copy/Paste into Dynamics SL has always been a strength- especially from Excel. The additional power of being able to use Excel for a myriad of calculations, including complex allocations, and formatting the result into a JE to paste directly into the Journal Entry Screen has saved countless hours in data-entry, and made re-use of complex items very easy.
Read full review
Cons
  • In Application Studio, there are quite a few things that you just have to know in order to really get it to work right. Such as when you are updating a dataview you have to save them refresh and then go back to the wizard to get the added fields that you may have added from a BAQ.
  • When running MRP it has a tendency to stall or not finish on occasion. This is a problem as we do not get any PO Suggestions when this happens.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • When we have a lot of invoices rather than just a few large invoices, we can be frustrated by how long it takes Flexible Billings to generate a lot of invoices
  • It would be nice if Dynamics SL had an easy integration to some of the nicer salestax tools such as Avalara and CCH.
  • It would be nice if the fixed assets module and electronic banking were not third party.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Easy to use, reliable, known product, best product configurator, Epicor continues to offer improvements every year.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
Read full review
Usability
There is always room for improvement! I've used Great Plains ERP/MS Dynamics and Epicor my entire career. both do some things really well. Both could learn from each other. The KInetic user interface is much better than the classic windows overall. Please keep adding more functionality to the core financials!!! You need the accountants to be on your side.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
SL itself is relatively easy to use and most of the Help Files documentation is well kept and outstanding in the amount of information that is given. Most end users pick up the functions quickly and are off and running after some limited training. There will always be questions and research to be done, but overall SL is relatively easy to follow for a seasoned user
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
Read full review
Support Rating
If the answer to your problem is not readily available in an answer book, your response or solution will take months, if you get one at all. Problems need to be sent to support and duplicated by them before they try to fix it. This is extremely frustrating because you have to prove to Epicor that you are having an issue. If by some miracle you get by this barrier, your problem is submitted to development for review. You can't speak to them or communicate in any way directly. This group appears to be completely unconcerned about user issues or customer service. Our experiences have been negative across the board.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Many times support will tell you that your issue is an identified bug and will be scheduled in the future to be fixed in a future release. The knowledgebase has gotten worse in recent years and much more difficult to use. many times you can't find the error during the search
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Viewpoint is our current ERP provider, but they pushed all of their customers to the cloud (which we didn't want to do). They also pushed all customers to a single product with a corresponding significant increase in price, while not providing additional value to our company. As a result, we considered some other options, but given that our sister company had been on Epicor for several years and we have shared IT resources, it made sense to all be on the same system.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew. We did try Great Plains and Peachtree (now Sage 50) and we discovered that they were rather complicated for our users. They were not as easy to maneuver and manipulate as SL and we felt that SL was much more "user friendly" and simplified, but still able to produce the same results.
Read full review
Scalability
Using the word Scalability usually implies an increase of use, or adding the use of other features. Making the product put to good/proper use for small companies without the need for full-time support, whilst integrity is maintained it is an entirely different topic. In my view, the current company may have acquired a full truck with options, where initially a small pick-up may have been better suited.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have increased our lead time of orders by about a week.
  • We have increased our output of product by 10% with the same amount of staff.
  • We were able to leverage Kinetic to optimize our business while moving two facilities.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • Dramatic improvement in our ability to judge the profitability of jobs.
  • Lots of improvements in delivering invoices and statements to customers.
  • Automated AP approvals and imaging made our last tax audit a breeze.
  • Ease of reporting data is a big plus. Financial statements with drill down capability are very useful.
  • One integrated system means less data moving around and more real time information.
  • EFT payments, email statements and live linked Excel charts have improved our efficency
  • Too many more to name.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Epicor Kinetic Screenshots

Screenshot of Production ManagementScreenshot of Role-Based Analytics and Business IntelligenceScreenshot of Planning and SchedulingScreenshot of Shipping and ReceivingScreenshot of the General LedgerScreenshot of Training and Development