TalentLMS is an LMS built for training success, presented as fully customizable and easy to manage, so that teams embrace training while feeling right at home. It is used to provide the right training to any team and every use, while giving expert guidance and support every step of the way.
$139
per month 1-40 users
Go1
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
The Go1 platform upskills organizations with relevant content for employees, curated from their content library and delivered through the tools employees already use. Go1 offers skill-aligned content from audio to video, and from compliance to business, and tech. Its integrations with HR tech providers and workplace apps allow teams to take advantage of the Go1 library through an existing solution. Go1 brings learning…
N/A
Pricing
TalentLMS
Go1
Editions & Modules
Core
$109
per month (billed yearly)
Grow
$229
per month (billed yearly)
Pro
$399
per month (billed yearly)
Enterprise (Custom plan)
Custom
annual plan Starts at 1000 users
Content Hub
Please Contact
Connect
Please Contact
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
TalentLMS
Go1
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Users can stay on the Forever Free plan and upgrade, or downgrade or cancel at any time. Monthly pricing also available. Discount available for annual pricing.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
TalentLMS
Go1
Features
TalentLMS
Go1
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
TalentLMS
8.3
50 Ratings
2% above category average
Go1
8.0
14 Ratings
6% below category average
Course authoring
8.434 Ratings
8.211 Ratings
Course catalog or library
8.034 Ratings
8.713 Ratings
Learning content
7.831 Ratings
8.614 Ratings
Mobile friendly
8.544 Ratings
00 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications
8.949 Ratings
7.712 Ratings
Assignments
8.346 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance management
8.742 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning administration
8.749 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics
8.647 Ratings
7.914 Ratings
Social learning
7.122 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Gamification
7.524 Ratings
7.06 Ratings
Single Sign On (SSO) Enabled Learning
8.826 Ratings
00 Ratings
Player/Portal
00 Ratings
8.512 Ratings
eLearning Content
Comparison of eLearning Content features of Product A and Product B
TalentLMS is user-friendly enough for someone new to LMS management can get a site up and running in a relatively quick manner. It is rather intuitive to operate. My needs have been a rather small scale of 400 learners and TalentLMS more than meets the need to produce a professional-looking and operational website to send customers and staff. The point here is that although I do not know how well it can be up-scaled, it certainly delivers for small to medium organizations to need to get content online
Go1 is a great solution for SMEs looking to implement their first LMS. The cost per person is reasonable and the content available is vast. The Account Managers do a great job at working with the business to ensure a smooth launch, with loads of additional content to drive usage (email templates, schedules, etc).
Email notifications have arbitrary limits on what information can be included. For example, you cannot include the user password in any notification email regarding course enrollment, group enrollment, etc.
Notification emails are not sent out in a reasonable time frame. Sometimes, it takes over 20 minutes for a new user to get their registration email.
It would be nice to get reports in the base domain containing customer user fields from various branches.
The integration from Go1 to SF can be improved with more attention to detail that can make a big impact in the operational cost of running the integration. Many information and configuration in the target system that should be available to pre-filling or can be pre-configured to allow better automated integration that is time efficient.
The reporting can be improved and further automated; this include in an integrated scenario.
The ease of use, the robustness of the offering, and familiarity. It does everything we need and probably more. We likley don't utilize all the functionality it has as it does what we want it to without having to dig that deep into its tools. Their course library also has saved us some time in terms of saving time from creating some basic courses.
The system is intuitive. It does not have a lot of features that are hidden behind secret menus or elsewhere. There are often multiple ways to get to the same place through different menus without having to go back to the home or root menu. It makes things pretty easy. Additionally, if there is something I can't figure out, there is documentation available to help with that.
Quick answer, comprehensive, and customized. I sent an email with multiple questions and feedback about their new UI, and the agent addressed all of them directly and honestly no sugar-coating and no call center lingo. Most questions can also be addressed directly in their UI with a really good help center widget.
Implementation was relatively easy. When we set up a second branch, we needed a little help. But the support area is well-detailed. My clients had no experience with an LMS and their digital skills were limited. We had a long way to go. Nevertheless, it was relatively easy. It was rather quick!
Both are good, but the pricing and general value proposition of Talent LMS are better than Trainual in my opinion. Trainual is a bit more modern and cleaner looking from a user interface perspective, but it comes at a higher cost. Both platforms provide very similar features in the way of general functionality and user experience, but Talent LMS wins because of its better pricing model.
Go1 has the biggest volume of content in the most varied formats. This allows us to tailor content for accessibility and neurodiversity purposes, skillsets, job roles and interests. We chose Go1 because they don't use pushy corporate sales and use a much softer sales pitch, as the product speaks for itself. This friendly tone of marketing was a major factor in choosing them over pushier, less personal brands