Esker vs. FileHold Document Management
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Esker | Score7.4 out of 10 | N/A | Esker is a global cloud platform built to unlock strategic value for finance and customer service professionals and strengthen collaboration between companies by automating the cash conversion cycle. Esker’s mission is to build a foundation that promotes positive-sum growth, increased productivity, improved employee engagement, and greater trust between organizations. | N/A |
FileHold Document Management | Score7.7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | FileHold is a document and records management software. FileHold is integrated with both Microsoft Office and Microsoft Teams and provides secure single log in to both FileHold and Office 365. FileHold can be deployed on a customers own servers or private cloud or hosted by FileHold on the Azure Cloud Standard features include; document scanning, version control, search, tagging, full user audit trail, archiving and scheduled disposition. Out of the box, users can search the FileHold… | $30 per month per seat |
| Esker | FileHold Document Management | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | In all cases the price per user will decrease as more users are added to the system. FileHold has many optional and custom features that can be chosen and will change the price. For outright purchase of a license there is an optional 20% per year support and upgrade fee. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Esker | FileHold Document Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
78% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Esker | FileHold Document Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Square 9 Softworks Score9.3 out of 10 | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Esker | FileHold Document Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 7.0 |
| Usability | 5.5 | 6.0 |
| Performance | - | 7.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.9 | - |
| Ease of integration | - | 6.0 |
| Esker | FileHold Document Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | FileHold Document Management Screenshots |







