Esker vs. Ramp
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Esker | Score7.4 out of 10 | N/A | Esker is a global cloud platform built to unlock strategic value for finance and customer service professionals and strengthen collaboration between companies by automating the cash conversion cycle. Esker’s mission is to build a foundation that promotes positive-sum growth, increased productivity, improved employee engagement, and greater trust between organizations. | N/A |
Ramp | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | Ramp is a corporate card and spend management solution that helps companies of all sizes to accelerate growth without compromising on their finances. With a direct integration with the user's accounting solutions, Ramp helps finance teams save time tracking expenses, following up with employees, and closing their books. Ramp offers companies real time visibility into spending, automated expense reporting, and advanced insights into ways to cut spend. | $0 |
| Esker | Ramp | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Ramp provides a free tier for smaller teams who want to simplify finances. A step-up to our free tier is Ramp Plus, starting at $15/month/user along with platform fees based on team size. Then, for large businesses, the Enterprise plan requires a custom quote. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Esker | Ramp | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 12 Answers | 97% Would buy again 32 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 9 Answers | 97% Delivers good value for the price 28 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | 94% Happy with the feature set 31 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | 97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 28 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
78% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | 97% Implementation went as expected 28 Answers | |
| Esker | Ramp | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Square 9 Softworks Score9.3 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Esker | Ramp | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Usability | 5.5 | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | 8.9 | - |
| Esker | Ramp | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Ramp Screenshots |









