ETO Software is a legacy case management solution supported by Social Solutions, acquired by Bonterra, and later sold as Bonterra ETO. The application is not the company's current case management solution.
N/A
Oracle CRM On Demand
Score9.1 out of 10
N/A
The basis of this offering is the Market2Lead product that Oracle acquired in 2010. It has now been fully integrated with Oracle's On Demand CRM product and is a full-featured marketing automation product with features from lead management and nurturing, to measuring marketing ROI.
N/A
Pricing
ETO Software (legacy)
Oracle CRM On Demand
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ETO Software (legacy)
Oracle CRM On Demand
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
ETO Software (legacy)
Oracle CRM On Demand
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of ETO Software (legacy) and Oracle CRM On Demand
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.9
25 Ratings
13% above category average
Customer data management / contact management
00 Ratings
8.025 Ratings
Workflow management
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Territory management
00 Ratings
8.024 Ratings
Opportunity management
00 Ratings
8.025 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
00 Ratings
9.022 Ratings
Contract management
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Quote & order management
00 Ratings
10.023 Ratings
Interaction tracking
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
00 Ratings
10.023 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of ETO Software (legacy) and Oracle CRM On Demand
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.7
24 Ratings
23% above category average
Case management
00 Ratings
10.024 Ratings
Call center management
00 Ratings
10.023 Ratings
Help desk management
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of ETO Software (legacy) and Oracle CRM On Demand
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.5
24 Ratings
9% above category average
Lead management
00 Ratings
8.024 Ratings
Email marketing
00 Ratings
9.022 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of ETO Software (legacy) and Oracle CRM On Demand
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
24 Ratings
16% above category average
Task management
00 Ratings
9.023 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
00 Ratings
9.022 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
9.023 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of ETO Software (legacy) and Oracle CRM On Demand
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.5
24 Ratings
11% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
10.024 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
00 Ratings
6.623 Ratings
Customizable reports
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of ETO Software (legacy) and Oracle CRM On Demand
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.2
24 Ratings
7% above category average
Custom fields
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Custom objects
00 Ratings
9.024 Ratings
Scripting environment
00 Ratings
5.820 Ratings
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
9.023 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of ETO Software (legacy) and Oracle CRM On Demand
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.5
25 Ratings
12% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.025 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of ETO Software (legacy) and Oracle CRM On Demand
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
18 Ratings
18% above category average
Social data
00 Ratings
9.018 Ratings
Social engagement
00 Ratings
9.018 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of ETO Software (legacy) and Oracle CRM On Demand
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
22 Ratings
18% above category average
Marketing automation
00 Ratings
9.022 Ratings
Compensation management
00 Ratings
9.020 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of ETO Software (legacy) and Oracle CRM On Demand
ETO Social Solutions should be avoided until they start caring about the problems generated by their software. In regards specifically to the ARMS suite utilized by the entire state of California, until the ETO software learns how to speak with SOMS, and unless it can be customized by knowledgeable people who consult with front-line users. It is not appropriate to provide the state legislature with bad data. I have 6 years of experience with it and I have multiple sources of agreement from fellow users throughout the state.
I think it is well suited for organizations which are large with a lot of users so as to be able to minimize the cost of operations. Also, the organization which interacts mostly with customers can use Oracle CRM on demand.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
ETO's customization allows for the use of so many different and unique applications.
The ability to build extremely customized reports also allows us to get very detail oriented results or very broad building wide stats.
The additional added features such as workflow, referrals, and ETO Engage are useful in their own way and add more ways to better track and record data while simplifying some end-user processes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Several of our members were not familiar with various IT functions within CRM prior to working with it and so they were able to develop a working knowledge of IT pretty quickly afterwards.
It has a familiar feel to it as it allows users to work the data into a spreadsheet type layout with pivot tables and graphs and so it is quick to adopt.
Customization is great with a working knowledge of HTML, which isn't too hard to learn. You can really adapt CRM to any needs stylistically or content wise.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
The user interface is not intuitive and exceptionally difficult for non-tech savvy people to learn.
The system is not as customizable as we were led to believe at the initial purchase.
The system does not interface well with other systems. Organizationally we are moving towards data integration, and we will likely replace ETO because of this limitation.
Considering the limitations of the system, the cost is quite high. We've seen only marginal benefits of this system over pen and paper, and the ROI is not promising.
The initial build process was very frustrating. We didn't understand what the developer was billing us for. Something like simple touchpoint forms was billed for more hours than it would seem to require.
A system like this should be both fully mobile compatible and have offline functionality.
We would benefit from more nuanced security settings.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The ability to schedule and push out reports is missing from this system. If we want to mass deliver a report on a schedule, we must run it, export it and email it out to the group, or purchase a 3rd party system.
The ability to trigger workflow events on a schedule is missing this system. Currently, there has to be a trigger initiated by a user and we have situations where we'd like to be able to schedule a work flow routine to go out and check from specific situations and then trigger an action. We'd also like to be able to trigger workflow actions on one object based on something in another object and this capability is very limited.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Social Solutions has been great for our organization. It has allowed us to not only report on data, but to dive into it to see trends and give snapshots of the current status of our neighbors. Social Solutions has been helpful in getting us to see additional ways we can use our data and ways that it is easier for front line staff to use this tool
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
As a technically savvy person with experience learning new database software systems I find ETO relatively straightforward now that I've been trained in it's use. However, many of our staff are less technically savvy and the learning curve for ETO can be grueling for many, who require frequent troubleshooting and support from me. Additionally, there are small quality of life improvements that would increase usability even for me - such as allowing multiple tabs to be open simultaneously or being able to use the browser's "back" and "forward" buttons.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Compared to other competitors I find it very easy to use and learn .It has been helpful in our organisation and we have been able to manage our projects and operations well without interference.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Routine maintenance is announced with plenty of lead time, and the few times I've been unable to log in to the system properly a simple refresh was all that was required to fix.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Mostly really strong now, although I understand that for some years before switching their hosting service to AWS performance was a real issue with ETO and we had frequent problems with pages timing out or other glitches stemming from performance issues. With AWS that is mostly a thing of the past, although it is still a major issue with the reporting tool which is unable to run reports on the entire database due to performance limitations, instead requiring admins to define universes prior to running queries.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We love the first tier customer support folks! They're friendly, helpful, and knowledgeable within the scope of their position. The experiences we've had with their supervisors have also been mostly good and again they seem to be doing what they can within the scope of their positions. This is what prevents me from selecting 1. Unfortunately, none of these wonderful folks can offer real solutions when things are actually broken. They verify there's a problem and send it to the black hole called "the developers". After that, we don't hear anything useful and we figure out how to live with/work around the problem ourselves. (Requests for updates typically get "still with the developer" responses.) This is highly frustrating given that most of our issues are basic system issues (functionality that worked then broke after an update by Social Solutions, servers not syncing, report universes not flattening automatically, etc.). All we want is for the system to work as designed and to be fixed in a timely fashion when it doesn't. Apparently, that's too much to ask. (And no, we don't expect it to happen instantly, programming and quality control checks obviously take time.)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Really good trainer and exhaustive curriculum covered, but ETO is a complex enough system that you don't *really* know how to use it until you've been in the trenches for a few weeks. For instance, I took a Report Writing training and emerged with some fluency in the reports interface and a vague understanding of the process, but immediately encountered a legion of instance-specific idiosyncrasies that would have been totally impossible to address in a webinar training for a dozen folks from different orgs working in different instances.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Hard to say, as I was not with the agency at the time. However, based on our use of the software ~5years later I can say that there were no catastrophic design choices made during implementation that have become unduly burdensome as we've scaled up.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
When we made our decision several years ago Social Solutions had just acquired Apricot. At that time it was recommended to use ETO based off our revenue stream. However, it seems like Social Solutions has put in a lot more time and effort into Apricot over ETO and it seems more modern and user friendly. I think it is worth a second look once our contract expires
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
MS Dynamics was easy to integrate to MS Power BI. This BI and reporting aspect is a clear strong point for Microsoft. MS solutions seem easier to integrate and learn, but this depends on the IT landscape and the complexity of integrations in a respective company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The core product scales well, and we've grown quite a bit as an agency during our use of ETO. However, there are some real pain points particularly around creating new programs and managing report universes that require extensive offline checklist resources and a full-spectrum understanding of how changing settings in one part of ETO can have downstream impact in other areas. This can introduce a "chilling" effect on proposed changes to the system, where there is strong incentive to leave things as-is to avoid unforeseen consequences.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I would say that at this point the overall ROI has been negative as we aren't getting much more out of our data by the switch we made to ETO, but the cost is much higher. I anticipate that will change as we get better at using ETO.
Most users that have switched to ETO in our organization prefer it to what they were using before and some are more appreciative of the value they can get from the data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This software can display in real-time when an order is submitted, received, fulfilled, and shipped out. We are able to know within the week of what new orders came in and how effective we are being from targeting specific regions of the nation.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info