An online virtual whiteboard for sketching hand-drawn diagrams, with features supporting visual collaboration. A basic version of Excalidraw can be used free, but team and collaboration features are offered in Excalidraw+.
$7
per month per user
Miro
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Miro is the AI Innovation Workspace that brings teams and AI together to plan, co-create, and build the next big thing, faster. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro's collaborative AI workflows keep teams in the flow of work, scale shifts in ways of working, and drive organization-wide transformation.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Excalidraw+
Miro
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Excalidraw+
Miro
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
The abundance of tools available for any work needed including but not limited to tasks like interfaces sketching, post-its organization, virtual workshoping. With the wide selection of templates, many such tasks are just one click away versus other tools where the users need …
We would a central whiteboarding collaboration tools to streamline the process and cost. And miro is more suitable for different users and use cases inside the organization and the majority of us already have license to miro and there's a solid foundation of user adoption …
I think every one of them has their own benefit, but Miro is possibly the most complete. I don't think Miro should overcomplicate and offer too many things. I think it is perfectly positioned to tailor to the requirements of a small to medium organization or smaller teams in …
Some of those do not allow to add images or videos or struggle handling links or simply they don't load youtube videos for example. Some of those you can not add GIFs or have trouble while handling files. With Miro all these work as expected its compatibility with different …
Miro is popular online collaborative whiteboard platform which is almost many different team is using it. Miro provide best features like best templates, and voting features and best diagramming tools as compared with other hence it's suitable for all kinds of requirements. We …
basically more ease of use, more ability to collaborate without too many errors (with OneNote there were many problems with the syncing) and more features to work with, without needing to customize too much.
Excalidraw is straightforward to use for basic, hand-drawn sketches, but it lacks some of Miro's capabilities. Miro is superior for more intricate projects requiring a more significant number of collaboration options. FigJam is not as effective for non-design jobs, but it works …
collaboration, collaboration , collaboration. It's all about that and this is why Miro won. But the capability to make export is less good than with draw.io (with the code embedded in a png file)
Gather Town is a multiverse cool tool. The app has a blackboard and a document section, which is the eraser tool. This approach is cool, but I feel Eraser misses a lot of functionalities that Miro has, such as the flexibility to collaborate with all team members, the …
I would say miro is more complete in its features, it can do most of the things the other products do also and feels more comfortable working on than draw io.
I find it quickest to visualize concepts, and its polish is much better than Excalidraw's. The learning curve is also way flatter for Miro than the other tools. If you need to get people together to visualize something, there's a high likelihood that …
Miro has simple pricing, easy onboarding and takes couple of hrs to setup but once done its quite handy. Excalidraw is unique that it doesn't need any login but you cannot work on multiple boards so there is some tradeoff there. Lucidchart is very early in their product …
Miro is more versatile, has more features and can be as simple and as complex as you want it to be. Also very easy supports different types of entities (pictures, videos, links, pdfs, documents, etc.), and does not have a steep learning curve. It has all that I need.
Miro ensures secure and stable communication regardless of the number of attendees in a meeting or conference. Software pricing is more flexible and affordable. Unlimited software customization, which makes it stand out amongst its competitors. Seamless integration with third-party applications. Miro has amazing voice clarity and video quality. The software is easy to deploy and supports unlimited implementation frequency.
Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
Sticky notes cannot be easily resized. It would often be useful for them to transform into workspaces, because they become actual text content rather than just notes.
Perhaps there is no option to sort the work boards according to specific criteria (such as alphabetical order or date).
The various functions available should perhaps be explained clearly with a tooltip or something similar while you are working with the various tools. I often don't realise that certain things can be done.
I have advocate for the renew of Miro quite few times, however, it is not under my control as the decision is made in another team with their own budget. I would buy for my own entrepreneur projects (1-2 members) as I do know the value and work there 100%. So, I would pay out of my own pocket to get the value. However, If I wouldn't know the value it provides, it would be hard to decide with the current freemium features
I would rate Miro an 8 out of 10 for overall usability. It's easy to use and has lots of features for making the work easier. I can drag nodes, connect ideas and comment in real time without explaining much to anyone because every member of all the teams have access. For labelling schema design and maths concept mapping, it is incredibly perfect. However, issues related to lag when many nodes introduced and absence of LaTeX making complex equation writing hectic, are of great concern. If those issues were resolved, it's an easy 10.
I only give a 9/10 because of the speed at which it loads. I have never experienced issues with Miro logging me out early, or some other technical issue causing the program to crash, or even it just loading in perpetuity without ever actually coming up (unlike other programs such as SFDC). It take a minute for all of my boards to come up after I click on it in my favorites, but besides that, it's all good.
Sometimes it gets quite slow and there is a correlation between this and the size of the board. Hence we are trying to segment the boards based on product stages or projects so that the size doesn't go big. When you go from discovery to delivery on a simple board, it will get large and difficult to load, even crash or go white screen
We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
I would say on par, but a better value than Mural, hence why our company changed contracts. And, at this time, much better than Microsoft Whiteboard. With that being said, Microsoft has a lot of money to throw at it to add more features and obviously syncs with other office programs. It may be something from a feature standpoint to look at.
Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
I currently save around two to three hours a week now doing administrative tasks. It has saved the need for sending some emails and holding meetings.
I trust that I won't miss anything from my team now that we are all in sync with this tool. No more pouring over document comments in Office 365, Emails, Jira tasks, etc. It's all in one place, and can combine all of those other tools there as well with its elegant linking approach.
Starting projects and leading others is easy with these persistent and real time updates during meetings. No more "circling back on that point" because it is addressed right now!