All-in-one software with smart visuals and labelling
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
I mainly use Miro for quality control for labelled mathematics data. Also, Miro helps me map math concepts, tag relationships and many other technicalities before anything becomes code. The logic tree on Miro helps me catch the obvious missed points and gaps early on during production. It works as a central hub for brainstorming and mapping different strategies.
Pros
- Makes it easy to design and visualize different label hierarchies which keeps labelling rules unbiased and intact.
- It has unique unique feature where team members can jump onto same board, edit and comment in real time. Makes it efficient.
- Built in templates in Miro really helps in making quality board layouts fast making it easy to organize sections.
- Its infinite canvas never runs out. Helps me in mapping many interconnected topics or focusing on future model.
- Everyone being able to see progress in real time has made discussions 40% faster and way more efficient.
- Visual mapping made error-spotting much easier reducing the time taken to review and clean-up by around 32%
- Instead of switching between notes, spreadsheets, and diagrams, Miro has it all in one place.
- Sped up the rate of work by 25-30% as we visually validate topic hierarchies before implementation now.
Miro is equipped with permission controls for me to share boards selectively to editors, viewers, or reviewers, keeping sensitive drafts safe. During review session, real time cursor tracking and integrated chat make remote meetings effective. It is very easy to see where the team member is pointing while discussing. Sticky sorting and auto arrangement helps organize feedback clusters by priority to colour, turning unorganized brainstorms into doable tasks.
Miro has reduced our dependency on long email threads, static documents and even some internal chat workflows. We can now directly comment on the shared Miro board, rather following the old method, where we used to exchange screenshots or annotated PDF's. The commenting, tagging, and presentation features make it a hybrid between a whiteboard, a project dashboard, and a QA sheet, resulting in cleaner communication and faster feedback loops.
I previously used Coda for documenting labelling rules and Google Jamboard for quick brainstorming. While using Coda, I always felt it was too text-heavy and too simplistic. Jamboard was visual but too shallow for structured mapping. Miro became the optimum choice for fast, visual and structured technical labelling. It keeps the hierarchies clean and our QA flows transparent.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation