TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ExpensePath

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AExpensePath is an expense tracking and management platform from the company of the same name in San Francisco.N/A

    JAGGAER

    Score6.2 out of 10
    N/AJAGGAER is a procure-to-pay provider in the higher education and government sectors. JAGGAER eProcurement and strategic sourcing customers gain access to suppliers on a scalable, customizable platform. The JAGGAER SaaS-based, source-to-settle solution provides unparalleled visibility, insights and recommendations to procurement leaders and suppliers. The result is a fluid supply chain driven by spend analysis, contract management, and an accounts payable solutions.N/A
    Pricing
    ExpensePathJAGGAER
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ExpensePathJAGGAER
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    ExpensePathJAGGAER
    Small Businesses
    Brex
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Expensify
    Score9 out of 10
    Precoro
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Emburse Expense Enterprise (formerly Chrome River)
    Score8.3 out of 10
    GEP Quantum Intelligence
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ExpensePathJAGGAER
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (35 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.4
    (17 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (5 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (9 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ExpensePathJAGGAER
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ExpensePath
    ExpensePath works great for mid-size companies with multiple locations and multiple levels of approval needed. It doesn't have the bells and whistles of more expensive options like Expensify or Concur, but they excel at being attentive to customer needs and simple to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    As a purchasing app, it is excellent. I cannot speak to its usefulness in the AP area. it may be less useful in a different environment, such as manufacturing. For research and healthcare use, it is excellent. Also, we use Banner as our ERP. SciQuest is well versed with integrating with Banner. Users with a different ERP may experience less pleasant results.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    ExpensePath
    • ExpensePath responds within minutes and helps solve issues right away. Vik and his team are always open to how they can better their product.
    • ExpensePath's app is quite simple and straightforward, making it easy to teach to even our technology averse employees.
    • Though we don't use it extensively, we appreciate ExpensePath's internal expense reporting functionality, which provides good insight into our employee's spending.
    • They correctly integrated our Sage Intacct GL accounts and dimensions directly into the system, so no additional mapping was needed after setup.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    • Source to settle: Although we did not purchase all the new applications in the suite SciQuest made, what we did use, worked and worked nicely. With SciQuest you can get a turn-key system.
    • I love the way SciQuest rolls out changes, measuring customer feedback, and rolling out major changes 3 times a year. Like clockwork you know what to expect ahead of time, deciding whether or not you need a particular enhancement (if optional), having plenty of time to make adjustments in business processes if needed, and/or user-base announcements.
    • I was always astonished to see both clients and potential clients come to the conferences. SciQuest would allow the "mixing" of clients and potential clients, apparently unafraid of any negative commentaries the potential clients might get. That has always been impressive to me as a techie myself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    ExpensePath
    • They're in the process of developing the ability to directly reimburse from ExpensePath rather than cutting a check through an ERP. This feature would be very helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    • Their existing pricing model for the number of Suppliers onboarded or removed has been a little disappointing as there are times when suppliers do have to be switched out.
    • They have greatly helped in making UNSPSC updating easier, but I would like to be able to get an extract with a delta that would make it easier for us to update our ERP as this information needs to be stored on both sides.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    ExpensePath
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    Simplified and user friendly system that has been implemented across our entire institute and with all of our vendors. We really like this program and it works well for us. Changing to another program would be a significant time investment and hassle
    Read full review
    Usability
    ExpensePath
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    There is a 3 month learning curve and then the features are easy to use. My AP team processes 400 invoices daily through the system. The things to watch for are vendor billing mistakes (no/incorrect PO number, information discrepancies) and buyer purchase request inconsistencies. Those are part of AP anyway so maybe it is what it is. The Sciquest AP software performs as designed some improvements needed. In our system I have documented a list of 60 improvements that could increase throughput up to 50%. Those improvements include making the AP records GUI format more customized for AP purposes, and improving the QC tolerance functionality, which can be laborious to sync (Match).
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    ExpensePath
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    They have had only a couple of very quick occasions where they were down for 1-2 minutes. One time they had a problem adding attachments. Very Reliable!
    Read full review
    Performance
    ExpensePath
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    Having used SciQuest for over five years and having their competitors, SciQuest offers the best user experience and integration between vendors and ERP.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    ExpensePath
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    They usually respond to medium-to-low priority issues very quickly, and high priority issues almost instantly. Their support team is knowledgeable and responsive. Their Supplier Enablement team is very good and is a feature that most of their competitors don't have. The company makes a serious effort to maintain good relationships with their customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    ExpensePath
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    SciQuest has changed its name to Jaggaer.https://www.jaggaer.com/
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    ExpensePath
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    We had an internal project manager who was well versed in PMI methodologies. I think the implementation would have gone far less successfully, or may even have failed entirely, without her. She was able to do all the things a project manager is supposed to do, and in an ordered and organized manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    ExpensePath
    Expensify was a nightmare. We used it for 8 months and couldn't wait to find something else. Their customer service was unresponsive and rarely got back to us in a timely fashion. They never solved any of the issues we were having with integrating to Sage Intacct, and their "smart scan" feature never worked once. Their app was painful to navigate. On top of the many reasons already listed, we switched to ExpensePath because they're not flashy. ExpensePath delivers a great product without the veneer of many of its competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    Again, our SciQuest system integrates with Banner. Banner does have a way to create, approve and report on POs. However, the SciQuest product is so much more user friendly, so the learning curve is very steep. Also, SciQuest gives us a lot more detail in our reporting and PO history, which is helpful when trying to remember what happened 6 month ago
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    ExpensePath
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    Highly reliable remotely hosted PTP solution that interfaces with our remote OCR vendor and with university sited operational servers. Twice a year over the last 3 years a SciQuest/OCR system file handling or network problem occurs that gets fixed within a day.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ExpensePath
    • The first goal of our finance department is to make all of the tools we use to gather information integrate with our main ERP, Sage Intacct. ExpensePath's integration has been flawless and saved us hours of manual expense entry.
    • The second goal of our finance department is to make all of the tools we utilize easily adoptable by new users. ExpensePath is one of the simplest, most responsive apps we've ever seen. Even those on our team who are averse to adopting new technology like ExpensePath.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    • Customers seem to be fine with selecting requisition items and having them pushed back via carts to a legacy system.
    • Converting one's legacy ERP system to a SaaS solution may prove to be too much of an overhaul in regards to converting to a new set of rules which do not fit exactly with current business processes. The inability to enhance in great detail is also a drawback for customers coming from a highly modifiable system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots