Worldpay from FIS vs. Fiserv Wealth Management Network vs. Oracle Banking Payments

Vantiv is excellent for companies that need to be able to accept credit cards and want to keep accurate reports. However, if you ever need to contact customer service or your account rep, be prepared to be extremely frustrated. Vantiv recently merged with another company, and we are having a very difficult time getting information from our account manager about how to access out account now.

Incentivized

Fiserv Wealth Management Network is well suited in scenarios where an organization has multiple financial services providers and would like the benefit of tying that all together and managing it from a single, unified solution. The benefit there is increased efficiency and productivity, especially when compared to the manual alternative of having managers log in to separate sponsor platforms.

Incentivized

If you have an Oracle-based core banking solution then it is very easy to integrate and user otherwise there is a big exercise to integrate it with another banking solution.

Incentivized

• It has broad support for networks and software solution.
• It is fairly easy to implement and configure.
• Has good technical support when you have the proper contact.

Incentivized

• R&D is fantastic as they have the resources
• Online resources to help figure things out
• Easy to navigate

Incentivized

• API framework.
• Mobile banking.
• Open banking API.
• Personal financial management.

Incentivized

• In my experience, Some of the WORST tech support/customer service I've ever experienced
• Two of the last four years, gift cards crashed for multiple days during our Black Friday sale
• Duplicate charges
• Fraud controls are weak and (for gift cards) cost extra for dubious protection
• It took them over a month (and constant badgering) to give us a copy of our contract
• The system crashes quite a bit, leaving our locations without any ability to charge customers
• I dread having to deal with WorldPay, yet have to on a daily, if not weekly, basis

• Cost ... it's definitely not the cheapest option out there. the way pricing is itemized and a separate upcharge for each add-on gets annoying. They can probably bundle things a little better and offer a discount on the bundled products
• the volume of system updates and changes is nauseating at times and we have to prepare and test accordingly every time there is a scheduled update. that takes up a lot of resources; quarterly updates to products would be much easier.
• more responsive support and ideally more stable support engineers ... it seems like turnover is high in their support roles and that impacts customer success and MTTR.

Incentivized

• Oracle JavaScript toolkit.
• Mobile banking fixed user interface.
• hard to integrate if you are not tech-y.

Incentivized

As long as Vantiv continues to improve and we can get better responses from customer service, we will likely continue to use Vantiv. However, if customer service declines, we will likely look for something else

Incentivized

Easy! Easy! Easy!

Incentivized

Many customer support employees of Vantiv do not seem to know much about the Vantiv website. I have been transferred around to as many as four different people to get an answer to what I thought was a simple question. I am not sure if it would be possible to receive adequate support for a more complex issue.

Incentivized

ANYONE would be better than Worldpay. My parent company requires its use. Otherwise, I would have run away screaming a long time ago.

Far superior in my opinion. More features, easier to navigate and superior customer service

Incentivized

• Positive- More clients are enticed to use World Pay when they hear the benefits.
• Negative- Customer service lacks so our clients tend to complain about that.
• Negative- Rates can be a little high depending if client is currently using a local bank.

Incentivized

• Speed of service is greatly improved across partners. I believe our MTTR for service requests has improved by 30-40%
• Standardized platform for our staff which translates to better retention and a lower training effort.
• Cost is the negative impact ... it goes without saying that using Fiserv is much more expensive to the manual alternative which is very human resource intensive but low cost. But that's to be expected ...we're just trading time for money.

Incentivized

• Increasing onboarding of customers.
• Hybrid mobile application.

Incentivized