Getscreen.me vs. Remote Desktop Services

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Getscreen.me
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Getscreen.me is a cloud-based software for administration, technical support and remote work. Service provides remote desktop access from a browser, without any installation. It has permanent access and boasts quick support and instantaneous connection, with computers in the user's personal cabinet. The service works over the HTTPS protocol, which includes AES encryption.
$0
Remote Desktop Services
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Remote Desktop Services from Microsoft is virtual desktop and remote user session technology.N/A
Pricing
Getscreen.meRemote Desktop Services
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Standard
$5
per month per user, per device
Advanced
$8
per month per user, per device
Enterprise
$10
per month per user, per device
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Getscreen.meRemote Desktop Services
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details16% discount with an annual subscription
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Getscreen.meRemote Desktop Services
Considered Both Products
Getscreen.me
Chose Getscreen.me
I've never used another tool for this purpose in the past so I can't compare it to anything else. I know that there are plenty of other tools out there that have this kind of functionality, but it's just not something I'm able to compare as I haven't had the occasion to use …
Chose Getscreen.me
Value for money is the main difference. For the cost - nothing touches Getscreen.me!
Chose Getscreen.me
Getscreen.me just works, and it works easily. There's no complex set up, no odd pricing, and the central management is wonderful.
Chose Getscreen.me
While TeamViewer is a more mature/developed product. TeamViewer has more features and the interface is very similar but TeamViewer feels better. While TeamViewer currently takes the lead by a small margin for us, Getscreen.me is a very capable application for our needs. For …
Chose Getscreen.me
In my experience, Getscreen.me stacks up very well against other remote desktop software like TeamViewer and AnyDesk. One of the things I appreciate most about Getscreen.me is its competitive pricing. Compared to other remote control services like TeamViewer or AnyDesk, I find …
Chose Getscreen.me
more complete solution than anything else I have tried, and more cost effective than any other commercial application
Chose Getscreen.me
Occasionally I have to supply aid to friends or family members, or I desire to discuss how I want to share the television screen over the call in GetScreen.me. One click can create a key and share it; the sessions begin when it arrives. I'm keeping an eye on specific computers …
Chose Getscreen.me
Getscreen.me is easier to use as a support agent and on the client end. Remote access works much better than both Zoom or Teams. Those programs often to not work well for remote access when sharing screens
Chose Getscreen.me
First of all, I do not need to install anything, I can basically work everywhere even in-network where the internet is restricted like company networks. Cheaper than TeamViewer and more options were added frequently due to the high demand of features requested and the dev team …
Chose Getscreen.me
Teamviewer is more complicated than Getscreen.me. Plus I'm not sure it does the automatic IP resolution. More importantly, you can have permanent access to the computer without having the user to re-authorize anything. Once they've downloaded the software and run it, you have …
Chose Getscreen.me
This is a newer app and with work to do, but doesn't break the bank - especially like TeamViewer which goes up year on year.
Chose Getscreen.me
Getscreen.me works very well. The current feature set works well and I look forward to them adding more features. For ad-hoc support sessions, GSM works as well as anyone out there.
Remote Desktop Services
Chose Remote Desktop Services
Overall, remote desktop is so much easier to use if you are OK with the limited tools that it offers. If you're just looking to simply connect to another computer and make some quick changes, it is the way to go and the fastest way to do it. It is very simple and no frills!
Chose Remote Desktop Services
Remote Desktop Services is close to free, it is native and performs far better from a user experience point of view with almost no lag and excellent integration to the normal desktop environment. Even if another product is used Remote Desktop Services still forms part of the …
Chose Remote Desktop Services
Mainly licensing optimization, as Remote Desktop Services CALs are needed anyway for other products.
Chose Remote Desktop Services
Because it is a built-in, free solution for a small set of managed computers. No extra licenses required. No budget. Setup and configuration is instanteneous.
Chose Remote Desktop Services
TeamViewer and Splashtop
Chose Remote Desktop Services
Same functionality but RDP is already installed on Windows so no client to install and it's cheaper.
Chose Remote Desktop Services
All remote desktop or desktop virtualization services are quite costly and very complicated to set up. Microsoft's Remote Desktop Services has the advantage of being very available for many years, meaning practically any device can be used as a workstation. Tablets, …
Chose Remote Desktop Services
Remote Desktop is great for onsite or point-to-point connections without having to have a mediator type server.
Chose Remote Desktop Services
We used RDS on-site primarily because of how easy it is for users to transition from their own desktop to a remote desktop. However, from off-site, there are VPN and other security considerations to take into account, and the process gets a little more complex. In this …
Chose Remote Desktop Services
Solutions can be expensive and often offer more options than you need/want. Paying those extra dollars is tough when you have a budget. RDS in many cases works well and is cost effective.
Chose Remote Desktop Services
I use Remote Desktop Services only and have never used other services to replace it.
Chose Remote Desktop Services
Since Remote Desktop Services comes with the Windows OS, there's no need to install any additional software or agent for it to function. Even on the Mac, there's a client that can be installed for this to run properly. Unfortunately, unlike TeamViewer or Ultra VNC, Remote …
Chose Remote Desktop Services
Among all the reasons I've previously listed the main reason for choosing RDS is for the reliability and fast connection.
Chose Remote Desktop Services
Remote Desktop Services is an initiation from Microsoft in my view. The rest all are adapters for this and have a considerably inovated feature base.
Chose Remote Desktop Services
We have reviewed Citrix Xen Desktop and VMware's VDI solutions. For the cost, when compared to what Remote Desktop Services can provide us there was no contest. Remote Desktop Services can provide us all the features we require with little to no cost since we are an EA customer …
Chose Remote Desktop Services
I also used 2x Client and Citrix in the past. Both worked nice. Citrix is a little more complex and once with Windows updates damaged a Citrix installation causing all ICA traffic to not accept connections. 2x Client was simple and free for 3 connections (or used to be). Both …
Chose Remote Desktop Services
We selected Remote Desktop Services based upon price alone. Other solutions on the market are significantly more expensive, but if your company can foot the bill you should seriously consider products that have been on the market for longer. The lack of an ability to easily …
Features
Getscreen.meRemote Desktop Services
Remote Administration
Comparison of Remote Administration features of Product A and Product B
Getscreen.me
9.2
Ratings
15% above category average
Remote Desktop Services
4.5
Ratings
55% below category average
Screen sharing9.90 Ratings7.90 Ratings
File transfer9.90 Ratings4.50 Ratings
Instant message10.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Access to sleeping/powered-off computers8.00 Ratings1.10 Ratings
Over-the-Internet remote session9.80 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Initiate remote control from mobile6.50 Ratings3.40 Ratings
Centralized management dashboard10.00 Ratings2.30 Ratings
Session record10.00 Ratings2.30 Ratings
Multi-platform remote control9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Secure remote access with Smart Card authentication00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Remote management of servers & workstations00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Remote Active Directory® management00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Monitoring and Alerts00 Ratings3.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Getscreen.meRemote Desktop Services
Small Businesses
Remote Desktop Manager
Remote Desktop Manager
Score 9.6 out of 10
Getscreen.me
Getscreen.me
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Remote Desktop Manager
Remote Desktop Manager
Score 9.6 out of 10
Remote Desktop Manager
Remote Desktop Manager
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Remote Desktop Manager
Remote Desktop Manager
Score 9.6 out of 10
Remote Desktop Manager
Remote Desktop Manager
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Getscreen.meRemote Desktop Services
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Getscreen.meRemote Desktop Services
Likelihood to Recommend
It's well suited for IT employees who want to have an easy way to connect to other empoyees or customers. the quck conenct functionallity is easy to use and setup. Unfortunitly in germany some customers got slow internet and the performance from getscreen.me is not so great compaired to other remote desktop software.
Read full review
Remote Desktop Services provides access to work environments from any device. This allows us to ensure business continuity in case of disaster. It provides admins more control over access and security. Remote Desktop Services simplifies software updates and compliance management by reducing the need to act on end users devices.
Read full review
Pros
  • easy connection to new clients - both one time use and permanent
  • keep computers organized
  • support remote users from any device - even a cell phone with ease
  • multiple users with different subsets of computers
  • file sharing
  • block remote keyboard and mouse / monitor if needed
  • connection log
  • custom branding and personalized quick connection link
Read full review
  • Remote Desktop Services does an excellent job in providing a way for our staff to be working outside the office as if they're actually sitting inside the office. As long as the staff has an internet connection and a computer, he can use Remote Desktop Services to access files on our network.
  • Remote Desktop Services also eliminates a need to have a very fast internet connection to access files on the company network. Once a Remote Desktop Service session is established, the only bandwidth it takes up is the transfer of images you see on the display. It's like surfing on the web because you are using the company server as the resource to run the applications.
  • Remote Desktop Services provides a way for users to transfer files back & forth to/from staff's offsite laptop to/from the company network . There would be times when staff forget to copy a particular file onto the laptop for a presentation. So the way to retrieve the data from the network is to establish a Remote Desktop Session and then using Windows standar copy & paste feature to transfer the file from the network onto their laptop for use.
Read full review
Cons
  • On a mac, better ability to trigger a hidden dock
  • Certain key commands don't work and only trigger the computer you're actually on, not the remote one.
  • Make it a little less IT focused and a bit more layman friendly with some naming and features.
Read full review
  • No centralized management: unlike other products on the market, Remote Desktop Services in 2008r2 provides no single management console. Users are managed through a console on the connection broker, web apps are managed on a per server basis (even when those servers belong to a farm).
  • Image Management: because no use of an agent like PNTools is made, bringing up servers and adding them to the farm is inconvenient. Static IPs are a must and round-robin load balancing is really your only option with the connection broker. Updating a farm of 5+ servers becomes a chore, but still easier than updating 2000+ machines.
  • Still a very green product: while Microsoft offers a lot of the same features as the big guys, it's obvious that Remote Desktop Services is still in it's infancy and has a lot of room for growth. I have discovered and requested fixes for a number of bugs in the mobile app alone - something about the QA process for these apps seems to be lacking.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Value for money - Getscreen.me stands above the rest!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
For what we need it to do, it just works. And I'm sure that we're not even using it to the full extent of what it's capable and designed to do. If we had the need, Getscreen.me has many more features that we could implement. If the need arises in the future, it's great knowing that we already have a tool to utilize.
Read full review
The initial setup for Remote Desktop Services is complex, and licensing is costly. Each user connects to their virtual desktop hosted by a single server or group of servers, so a change or issue with servers quickly impacts every single user at the same time. Aside from that, users appreciate seeing their same personal desktop from any device or geographical location.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
There are some third party tools available that allow you to manage multiple connections.
Read full review
Support Rating
When I did reach out at the early days of using Getscreen.me I got a pretty prompt response, and all of my questions were answered. Since then, I have never needed to contact support. This is a GOOD thing!
Read full review
As with any Microsoft Server product, support for Remote Desktop Services requires a paid support package. These are license-based and very costly, on top of the already costly product licensing. Microsoft's licensing is complicated to begin with, so setting up licensing alone essentially requires a licensing expert's counsel. There is community documentation and support available on Microsoft websites, as well as community websites.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Easy, fast and worked every time to date!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
While TeamViewer is a more mature/developed product. TeamViewer has more features and the interface is very similar but TeamViewer feels better. While TeamViewer currently takes the lead by a small margin for us, Getscreen.me is a very capable application for our needs. For the price/performance we prefer Getscreen.me.
Read full review
Overall, remote desktop is so much easier to use if you are OK with the limited tools that it offers. If you're just looking to simply connect to another computer and make some quick changes, it is the way to go and the fastest way to do it. It is very simple and no frills!
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Cheap cost - I got it on Appsumo with no monthly fee.
  • The freedom to solve issues for transport companies given the high amount of data and control.
  • It works 100% of the time. There's never been any downtime from experience.
Read full review
  • Overall RDS has helped us provide services and programs to our users with relative ease.
  • The only "negative" impact is that users can have a bit of difficulty understanding how RDS works and what it means to access a remote desktop, but that isn't any fault of the program, it just takes a little extra training for users.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Getscreen.me Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of