Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Spanner
Score 5.6 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Spanner is a cloud database-as-a-service product offered as a service on Google Cloud Platform (GCP).N/A
Redis Software
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Redis is an open source in-memory data structure server and NoSQL database.N/A
SAP HANA Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
SAP HANA is an application that uses in-memory database technology to process very large amounts of real-time data from relational databases, both SAP and non-SAP, in a very short time. The in-memory computing engine allows HANA to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk which means that the data can be accessed in real time by the applications using HANA. The product is sold both as an appliance and as a cloud-based software solution.
$0.95
per month Capacity Units
Pricing
Google Cloud SpannerRedis SoftwareSAP HANA Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud SpannerRedis SoftwareSAP HANA Cloud
Free Trial
NoYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsIncludes a one year free trial.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud SpannerRedis SoftwareSAP HANA Cloud
Features
Google Cloud SpannerRedis SoftwareSAP HANA Cloud
Database-as-a-Service
Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Spanner
7.8
2 Ratings
9% below category average
Redis Software
-
Ratings
SAP HANA Cloud
-
Ratings
Automatic software patching8.82 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Database scalability8.82 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated backups10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Database security provisions5.82 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring and metrics5.82 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic host deployment7.62 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Spanner
-
Ratings
Redis Software
8.6
70 Ratings
3% below category average
SAP HANA Cloud
-
Ratings
Performance00 Ratings9.070 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability00 Ratings7.070 Ratings00 Ratings
Concurrency00 Ratings9.069 Ratings00 Ratings
Security00 Ratings8.064 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings9.070 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility00 Ratings9.063 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings9.063 Ratings00 Ratings
Relational Databases
Comparison of Relational Databases features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Spanner
-
Ratings
Redis Software
-
Ratings
SAP HANA Cloud
7.8
26 Ratings
2% below category average
ACID compliance00 Ratings00 Ratings8.319 Ratings
Database monitoring00 Ratings00 Ratings7.625 Ratings
Database locking00 Ratings00 Ratings7.921 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings00 Ratings7.522 Ratings
Disaster recovery00 Ratings00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings00 Ratings7.424 Ratings
Multiple datatypes00 Ratings00 Ratings7.524 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud SpannerRedis SoftwareSAP HANA Cloud
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud SpannerRedis SoftwareSAP HANA Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(2 ratings)
8.0
(76 ratings)
9.6
(308 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(12 ratings)
10.0
(11 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
9.6
(29 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.6
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.6
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
9.1
(251 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.6
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.6
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud SpannerRedis SoftwareSAP HANA Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Google Cloud Spanner is suited for limitless horizontal scaling while maintaining strong consistency which needs to support ACID. NoSQL databases work in scaling but no ACID support. RDBMS support ACID, but horizontal scaling is not as great. The API it provides result in some limitations to related areas of the code, such as connection pools or database linking framework. So high # of connection pools can vary.
Read full review
Redis
Redis has been a great investment for our organization as we needed a solution for high speed data caching. The ramp up and integration was quite easy. Redis handles automatic failover internally, so no crashes provides high availability. On the fly scaling scale to more/less cores and memory as and when needed.
Read full review
SAP
I think if you have a large organization, it's probably the product and the marketplace to go to. We're a large management consulting firm operating in four to seven countries. And generally speaking, I think that's the size and the scope where it scales best. I can't speak to smaller companies, but I can't see smaller companies leveraging the benefits as much as a larger organization can.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Super high availability
  • Scales automatically
  • High standard SLA
Read full review
Redis
  • Easy for developers to understand. Unlike Riak, which I've used in the past, it's fast without having to worry about eventual consistency.
  • Reliable. With a proper multi-node configuration, it can handle failover instantly.
  • Configurable. We primarily still use Memcache for caching but one of the teams uses Redis for both long-term storage and temporary expiry keys without taking on another external dependency.
  • Fast. We process tens of thousands of RPS and it doesn't skip a beat.
Read full review
SAP
  • Real-time reporting and analytics on data: because of its in-memory architecture, it is perfect for businesses that need to make quick decisions based on current information.
  • Managing workload with complex data: it can handle a vast range of data types, including relational, documental, geospatial, graph, vector, and time series data.
  • Developing and deploying intelligent data applications: it provides various tools for such applications and can be used for machine learning and artificial intelligence to automate tasks, gain insights from data, and make predictions.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Support for Views
  • Support for more databases (schemas).
  • More index types that can be supported (Functional)
  • Backups (ie table/data backup) if data is deleted or truncate by accident.
Read full review
Redis
  • We had some difficulty scaling Redis without it becoming prohibitively expensive.
  • Redis has very simple search capabilities, which means its not suitable for all use cases.
  • Redis doesn't have good native support for storing data in object form and many libraries built over it return data as a string, meaning you need build your own serialization layer over it.
Read full review
SAP
  • Requires higher processing power, otherwise it won't fly. How ever computing costs are lower. Incase you are migrating to cloud please do not select the highest config available in that series . Upgrading it later against a reserved instance can cost you dearly with a series change
  • Lack of clarity on licensing is one major challenge
  • Unless S/4 with additional features are enabled mere migration HANA DB is not a rewarding journey. Power is in S/4
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
No answers on this topic
Redis
We will definitely continue using Redis because: 1. It is free and open source. 2. We already use it in so many applications, it will be hard for us to let go. 3. There isn't another competitive product that we know of that gives a better performance. 4. We never had any major issues with Redis, so no point turning our backs.
Read full review
SAP
We would rate our likelihood of renewing at 9/10. SAP HANA Cloud has proven to be a highly reliable and scalable data platform that consistently delivers strong performance. Its seamless integration with our overall SAP landscape, combined with improved analytics and real-time data capabilities, makes it a core part of our long-term technology strategy.
Read full review
Usability
Google
No answers on this topic
Redis
It is quite simple to set up for the purpose of managing user sessions in the backend. It can be easily integrated with other products or technologies, such as Spring in Java. If you need to actually display the data stored in Redis in your application this is a bit difficult to understand initially but is possible.
Read full review
SAP
It is very useful solution which provides you speedier data processing, real-time analytics. It helps you manage diverse data types. It also offers you excellent disaster management. It has user friendly interface which helps you navigate system and transactions easily and perform task smoothly.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Google
No answers on this topic
Redis
No answers on this topic
SAP
so far, we didn't get any outage
Read full review
Performance
Google
No answers on this topic
Redis
No answers on this topic
SAP
so far good
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Redis
The support team has always been excellent in handling our mostly questions, rarely problems. They are responsive, find the solution and get us moving forward again. I have never had to escalate a case with them. They have always solved our problems in a very timely manner. I highly commend the support team.
Read full review
SAP
However, I am not the right person to answer this as we have another department to handle support and contact the service provider for any support required. Although i will say that they are the quick respondent and knows how to handle querry of the customers and provide quick and better support.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Redis
Whitelisting of the AWS lambda functions.
Read full review
SAP
Professional GIS people are some of the most risk-averse there are, and it's difficult to get them to move to HANA in one step. Start with small projects building to 80% use of HANA spatial over time.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
At that point, we were looking at something [that] can hold our relational database, [...] provide stable connection, and maintain high ACID transition. BigTable is for nonrelational database so it was out of our [sight] very quickly. BigQuery is a data warehouse that can hold huge amount of data but not ideal for transition. AWS RDS is [...] similar to Spanner but because most of our services are already on GCP, so we went with Spanner.
Read full review
Redis
We are big users of MySQL and PostgreSQL. We were looking at replacing our aging web page caching technology and found that we could do it in SQL, but there was a NoSQL movement happening at the time. We dabbled a bit in the NoSQL scene just to get an idea of what it was about and whether it was for us. We tried a bunch, but I can only seem to remember Mongo and Couch. Mongo had big issues early on that drove us to Redis and we couldn't quite figure out how to deploy couch.
Read full review
SAP
I have deep knowledge of other disk based DBMSs. They are venerable technology, but the attempts to extend them to current architectures belie the fact they are built on 40 year old technology. There are some good columnar in-memory databases but they lack the completeness of capability present in the HANA platform.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Google
No answers on this topic
Redis
No answers on this topic
SAP
I don't have visibility in licensing
Read full review
Scalability
Google
No answers on this topic
Redis
No answers on this topic
SAP
Limitation of training deliverable by organization
Read full review
Professional Services
Google
No answers on this topic
Redis
No answers on this topic
SAP
We are still in process for the first applciaiton
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Backups specifically if transactional data is deleted. Restoring made us lose time.
  • Sharding on Horizontal level was quick and easy. Deployment and increasing nodes is easy
  • Large dataset handling.
  • ACID compliance
Read full review
Redis
  • Redis has helped us increase our throughput and server data to a growing amount of traffic while keeping our app fast. We couldn't have grown without the ability to easily cache data that Redis provides.
  • Redis has helped us decrease the load on our database. By being able to scale up and cache important data, we reduce the load on our database reducing costs and infra issues.
  • Running a Redis node on something like AWS can be costly, but it is often a requirement for scaling a company. If you need data quickly and your business is already a positive ROI, Redis is worth the investment.
Read full review
SAP
  • ROI has always been high in terms of the functionality that it offers and the security features it comes with.
  • Managing large volumes of data in real-time is not an easy task, but it does it pretty well with faster data processing.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Redis Software Screenshots

Screenshot of Database configurationScreenshot of Database metricsScreenshot of DatabasesScreenshot of NodesScreenshot of Alerts