Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google VR
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Google VR is an SDK for building VR applications including two mobile VR platforms, Daydream and Cardboard.N/A
Mendix
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Mendix is a low code platform-as-a-service offering with mobile and social extensions. Mendix was acquired by Siemens August 2018.
$0
ServiceNow App Engine
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
ServiceNow App Engine aims to bring creator workflow apps to production quickly for mission-critical tasks. Design with best-practice guidance and templates within a holistic low-code dev experience.N/A
Pricing
Google VRMendixServiceNow App Engine
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free Edition
$0
Pro Edition
1,250
per month (billed annually)
Enterprise Edition
1,675
per month (billed annually)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google VRMendixServiceNow App Engine
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google VRMendixServiceNow App Engine
Features
Google VRMendixServiceNow App Engine
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Google VR
-
Ratings
Mendix
9.0
9 Ratings
7% above category average
ServiceNow App Engine
8.2
10 Ratings
3% below category average
Visual Modeling00 Ratings9.39 Ratings7.410 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings8.99 Ratings8.49 Ratings
Platform Security00 Ratings9.09 Ratings8.410 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings9.49 Ratings8.210 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings8.89 Ratings8.59 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings8.89 Ratings8.010 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google VRMendixServiceNow App Engine
Small Businesses
Autodesk 3ds Max
Autodesk 3ds Max
Score 8.8 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Contentful
Contentful
Score 7.5 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Contentful
Contentful
Score 7.5 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google VRMendixServiceNow App Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(3 ratings)
9.0
(66 ratings)
6.8
(7 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(12 ratings)
7.6
(3 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(14 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google VRMendixServiceNow App Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
It's well suited when reaching a general population who's not too tech-savvy and isn't well integrated with the current VR ecosystem. To get into Google VR all you need is a Google Cardboard and a phone with the supported software. The setup for an Oculus and other devices really takes a lot of time to set up and equipment. That's Google VR's greatest factor.
Read full review
Siemens AG
Mendix excels in scenarios involving Business Process Automation, making it a strong choice for applications requiring workflow automation, including processes like request approvals, document management, and other business workflows.Conversely, Mendix may be less suitable for projects that demand highly customized solutions with extensive custom coding. Its primary focus on low-code development may not align well with the requirements of projects that heavily rely on intricate and specialized coding.
Read full review
ServiceNow
Well suited - for someone who enjoys minimal coding with maximum throughput. For organisations who look for IT solutions basis customer a priority. Very well suited for creating tickets for incidents, changes etc Not well suited - for small scale organisations where the customers are less and managing them is easy
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Navigation
  • Augmented reality.
  • Virtual reality.
  • Google lens.
Read full review
Siemens AG
  • We're able to really easily develop different views that are very specific to a customer's needs or customer's different types of user needs. So for example, the production managers can have a certain view that's relevant to them and then certain line managers can have views that are specific to them that allow them to run different scenarios which they define. So it allows us to easily build customized apps for each different type of user.
Read full review
ServiceNow
  • Workflows
  • Notifications
  • Management
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Documentation
  • E-mail
  • Forum support
Read full review
Siemens AG
  • Earlier versions lacked in UI/Ux. This is still improving.
  • Since everyone and anyone can create custom add ons (widgets), Mendix could improve their quality checks (but not as rigid as eg Apple).
  • Upgradeability used to be somewhat of an issue. Version 7 looks to be handling this better than previous versions.
Read full review
ServiceNow
  • Not much for this tool, just the deep setting to new users.
  • Managing multiple project data.
  • Huge amount of data migration to new user.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
No answers on this topic
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
ServiceNow
There are limited use cases where we are just using the service now app engine as of now
Read full review
Usability
Google
No answers on this topic
Siemens AG
A 10 would say I have nothing to wish for. A 9 means I haven't seen anything better.This tool really helps you in the whole creation and maintenace cycle, so from requirements to building/modeling to testing to deploying to capturing feedback.
Read full review
ServiceNow
Since people can handle the tool without any development background, this was really helpful and can be adopted by anyone, as reusability functions and drag-and-drop features are very easy. Many in-built features and functionality for integrating other applications are handy and adaptable.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Google
No answers on this topic
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
ServiceNow
Almost 100% available on time
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Siemens AG
Response times are quick and you will get updates regularly about the status of your request. Even with very technical questions they have specialists that can help you with your problems it will give you an answer or help you with a work around.
Read full review
ServiceNow
They tried their best to resolve our queries every time we contacted them about any technical support
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
ServiceNow
App engine can be used just to process the minimal amount of the data which is being received from the user. We are service now catalogue items or any other data technology.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Google VR lets us use Google lens. Google lens is the best way to find a certain place, object, or thing in a live form. We can a ticket, and using scanning the barcode using google lens tells us the arrival and departure. We can copy a text and paste it onto our laptop screen. We can try any outfit virtually and look if it's in our room.
Read full review
Siemens AG
Mendix would be my preferred system all the way. The system is designed for these kinds of works. I've worked with WP and DNN but they should be used just for websites. To create an app for a business value, I would suggest Mendix. Also, the offline capabilities of Mendix have greatly improved since the deployment of Mendix 7.13.
Read full review
ServiceNow
ServiceNow App Engine is best among all the competitors. Its integration is best with Outlook and ERP, its SLA management is best, and very organized filters are very useful. Categorization of tickets is something that is very useful. It's very easy to search the tasks/order with limited keywords and very easy to customize. The best part is we can simply reply on mails using ServiceNow App Engine and keep a proper log of the tickets.
Read full review
Scalability
Google
No answers on this topic
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
ServiceNow
It is scalable but not reliable
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Provided therapy for over 1000s of clients.
  • Helped a company find it's own business based on this product.
  • It's fun!
Read full review
Siemens AG
  • It helps to speed up application development because of its low code by the fact that it's low code. It allows professional developers to focus more on specialized application development rather than the more routine application development that business IT and super users can do for themselves with some coaching from the IT department. So it's just allowing the more specialist professional developers.net, for example, Java in our organization to focus on more complex engineering application developments.
Read full review
ServiceNow
  • We have managed to close the un applied cash item from 56% to 89% in a given five working days period by using ServiceNow App Engine
  • By automating and entire money laundering process, we have managed to provide the background check data as quickly as within a day, which was actually taking weeks Same reports when we were doing the things manually.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Mendix Screenshots

Screenshot of Agile Project Management: Collaborate. Manage. Iterate.Screenshot of Central App Management: Application Management Made Easy.Screenshot of App Store: Hundreds of building blocks to get you out of the gate.Screenshot of 1-Click Deployment: Efficient DevOps. Enabled.