Grafana Loki vs. Looker
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Grafana Loki | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Grafana Logs (powered by Loki) brings together logs from applications and infrastructure in a single place. By using the exact same service discovery and label model as Prometheus, Grafana Logs can systematically guarantee logs have consistent metadata with metrics. Grafana Logs lets users send logs in any format, from any source so it’s easy to add to existing infrastructure and get up and running quickly. Leverage a wide array of clients for shipping logs like… | $0 |
Looker | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Looker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems. | N/A |
| Grafana Loki | Looker | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Required | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Must contact sales team for pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Grafana Loki | Looker | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Would buy again 85 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 99% Delivers good value for the price 75 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 87 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 55 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Implementation went as expected 69 Answers | |
| Grafana Loki | Looker | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BI Standard Reporting |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ad-hoc Reporting |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Report Output and Scheduling |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Data Discovery and Visualization |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Access Control and Security |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Mobile Capabilities |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Grafana Loki | Looker | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SolarWinds Papertrail Score8.9 out of 10 | Cyfe Score4 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server Score8.1 out of 10 | Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense) Score8.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SolarWinds Loggly Score7.7 out of 10 | Jaspersoft Community Edition Score7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Grafana Loki | Looker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 6.3 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 9.2 |
| Usability | 5.6 | 8.8 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 6.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.8 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Configurability | - | 10.0 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 10.0 |
| Data Sharing and Collaboration | - | 8.5 |
| Data Sources | - | 7.3 |
| Ease of integration | - | 10.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 10.0 |
| Professional Services | - | 10.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 10.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 10.0 |
| Grafana Loki | Looker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Looker Screenshots |






