HeyReach is an automated LinkedIn outreach tool, used to automate 10+ step sequences using connection requests, messages, follow-ups, InMails, likes, and voice-notes. Outreach sequences can be customized with its workflow builder, and includes steps like automatic invites, messages, follow-ups, InMails, and like posting.
$79
per month per seat
Oracle CPQ
Score5.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
Pricing
HeyReach
Oracle CPQ
Editions & Modules
Per LinkedIn Seat
$79
per month per seat
Special Agency Offer
$799
per month up to 50 accounts & 5 workspaces
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HeyReach
Oracle CPQ
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
HeyReach
Oracle CPQ
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of HeyReach and Oracle CPQ
Feature
HeyReach
7.6
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Lead nurturing automation
6.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated follow-ups
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead segmentation and distribution
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead Management Integrations
Comparison of Lead Management Integrations features of HeyReach and Oracle CPQ
Feature
HeyReach
8.7
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Integrations with CRMs
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with data storage tools
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with lead automation tools
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion Rate Optimization
Comparison of Conversion Rate Optimization features of HeyReach and Oracle CPQ
Feature
HeyReach
8.5
2 Ratings
2% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
KPI analytics
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Drop-off analytics
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B tests
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form Building
Comparison of Form Building features of HeyReach and Oracle CPQ
Feature
HeyReach
6.4
2 Ratings
26% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Conditional logic paths
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form templates
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile responsiveness
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Date picker
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
File upload
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic content
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of HeyReach and Oracle CPQ
We use it for all of our LinkedIn outbound internally, and it only takes one employee to oversee. We have 5 senders, so something that would have previously taken a lot of coordination and education (writing SOPs, training the rest of the team, overseeing that they follow the process daily/weekly/monthly, etc.) is now handled by one person in a few hours every week. If you compare it to legacy, enterprise tools–it's a no brainer. For a fraction of the cost, you are getting the same (or significantly more) value and features, no complicated annual contract that ties you down. Not to mention that they have incredible customer service and content. I habitually speak with the founding team, have asked for features and then seen them in the product within days/weeks. You can't get that at any of the competitors.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is a very good tool especially the way they are improving themselves, as I have been using this platform before they even launched properly, & they are giving the requested features as well. The only thing is that as they scale, they need to have a better customer support team to handle the issues
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.
Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.
EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.
The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.
Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
Many of the competitors aren't listed in TrustRadius. But there are dozens more. They are either very enterprise or quite new (small challenger companies). HeyReach makes the enterprise options look wildly pricey and unreasonable, and they stand out from the other challengers by their approach, content, and roadmap. I've used so many tools and HeyReach has definitely made its way into our standard rotation.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.