The Alfresco platform, from Hyland, delivers comprehensive cloud-native content services. It is used to intelligently activate processes and content to accelerate the flow of business.
N/A
SugarSync
Score 4.1 out of 10
N/A
SugarSync is a cloud storage and backup solution designed for small businesses.
$7.50
per month
Pricing
Alfresco
SugarSync
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
100 GB
$7.49
per month
250 GB
$9.99
per month
500 GB
$18.95
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Alfresco
SugarSync
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Alfresco
SugarSync
Features
Alfresco
SugarSync
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Alfresco
8.2
7 Ratings
2% above category average
SugarSync
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document management
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Records management
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
10.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management
8.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated workflows
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile support
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Alfresco
-
Ratings
SugarSync
9.4
8 Ratings
12% above category average
Versioning
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Video files
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Audio files
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Document collaboration
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
Access control
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
File search
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Device sync
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Product A and Product B
Alfresco
-
Ratings
SugarSync
9.7
8 Ratings
12% above category average
User and role management
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
File organization
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Device management
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Product A and Product B
Easy integration with the external APIs Workflows can be invoked via REST call Wonderful swagger documentation for process REST APIs REST, MULE, CAMEL, Google Drive, and Box features are available with Alfresco Process Services The micro-service version deployment should be well documented and needs improvement
When doing daily jobs, if you’re sharing large files, I think Dropbox works a lot better but if you have a system where you’re working within that system and you want to be able to work with that system and have certain folders that you have access to all the time then SugarSync might be just the ticket.
Alfresco Process Services and Alfresco Application Development Framework integration makes for best functionality/application of ECM.
Use case alignment - Marketing content and documentation of specific business requirements and user stories being available as reference material/documentation.
Can only think of one thing. I have helped others to get going with SugarSync and they if they have problems it is understanding the cloud.... So maybe (if it dosen't exist already) I would like to have a animation of the proces with "flying" folders between desktops, clouds etc. Otherwise SugarSync is just great.
As per the current market and the line of products that are available for content and document management system, Alfresco is a very good option compared to other systems in terms of features and cost. Plus the community support is great. Also since the product is open source, it can be extended or understood in a better way.
I am not big fan of Alfresco Content Services' support; it works on its own speed and sometimes it becomes challenging to achieve business needs. However, I appreciate regular delivery of security patches and updates
Process was relatively smooth and overall, downtime minimal. MSI was very responsive to our needs and made the transition easier than it otherwise might have been.
All software has some pros and some cons. Alfresco has some good pluses, and suits our environment very well. It fit perfectly in the place that we are working on. That is why we decided to go with this software. Overall, the kind of content management that needs to be done in an organization is what would determine which software to use.
SugarSync, like all solutions, has its place in the data storage stack within a company. The main reason SugarSync is better than the other solutions is that it enables me to leave my hard drive organized and keep my existing file trees. I don't have to constantly move or copy files to a specific folder if I want them backed up.