IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery vs. IBM Targetprocess

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery, available on IBM Cloud, allows users to provision an integrated toolchain using customizable, shareable templates with tools from IBM, third parties and open source. Automate builds and tests with Tekton-based delivery pipelines, and control quality with analytics.
$0
IBM Targetprocess
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Targetprocess is a Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) SaaS that connects strategy, funding, and execution. It helps enterprises prioritize work, dynamically allocate resources, and continuously adapt plans. With real-time visibility and financial insights, organizations can deliver faster, clearer business outcomes.N/A
Pricing
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryIBM Targetprocess
Editions & Modules
Lite
$0.00
Professional
$35.00
Authorized user per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryIBM Targetprocess
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryIBM Targetprocess
Considered Both Products
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Its better than them
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Best fit for IBM Cloud and IBM Hybrid cloud strategy. Very well suited for RedHat Openshift and cloud-native build packs. Complementary solution for Enterprise Java workloads transformation and modernization journey such as java microservices development lifecycle and also …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
We chose IBM Cloud Developer Tools for multiple reasons. Cost, current infrastructure vendor list, and Cloud Operations team experience were key driving factors for us. Palo Alto's Prisma Cloud product was slick for sure but we found it more difficult to deploy and integrate …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
IBM Cloud developer tools had good support for mobile and web based applications and seemed relatively easy to integrate to our applications. We have other IBM tools so it had a slight edge over others when we compared.
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Google Cloud AI provides better speech-to-text integration for applications in which the word recognition ability is far good.
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
IBM Cloud Developer Tools stack up against Visual Studios and other integration suites, with an agnostic approach. IBM Cloud Developer tools integrate seamlessly with your existing stack to augment and accelerate data science and analytics projects at large. Tools are designed …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
This is recommended over other applications as it has a continuous delivery for non-mission critical applications also which has simple proof of concepts and this is reliable. Also, the integration to different platforms along with cloud implementation is an add-on. The ease of …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
IBM Cloud Developer Tools is way easier than Jenkins and most of the features Jenkins has are not useful for us and the features we wanted were absent ButIBM Cloud Developer Tools saved our lives and is perfect in all aspects as we can easily develop and deploy. The only thing …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Both competitors listed work in a similar manner; you can automate the deployment of servers using configuration files and the command line. The difference is that Ansible and Terraform are provider-agnostic, meaning you can use them for other hosting providers as well (AWS, …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Mainly, AWS offers 5G services which are futuristic. AWS has More products than IBM Cloud & it offers High Parallel Performance & Computing. Better global coverage than IBM Cloud & Rigid SLAs with credit compensation

Coming to Microsoft Azure, its user interface is very easy to …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Eclipse with IBM Cloud Foundry and Kubernets we used to develop application in on premises and deployed into the cloud. And we created containers, created many projects and deployed into the cloud by using Continuous Delivery in IBM Cloud. Great service and great support. IBM …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
There's not really a technical background on the decision of using IBM Cloud Continuous delivery. Our CTO assisted to a conference where IBM was promoting their services and offering a free tier. As in that instance the company was starting, every free tier offering was well …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
CI/CD is much more user friendly than Jenkins.
It better integrates to IBM Cloud features.
On the other side, Jenkins deployed in a VM or better, on a K8S cluster is a less expensive solution.
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
I find IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery service way easier to set up compared to Travis CI. The visual interface helps you navigate throughout the service effortlessly. I used Travis CI 2 years ago, although it wasn't complicated, I took more time to create and set up an instance …
IBM Targetprocess
Chose IBM Targetprocess
ServiceNow CPQ and SAP LeanIX Enterprise Architecture
Chose IBM Targetprocess
More value for less money, and easier to set up.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Selected IBM Targetprocess because of it's integration with Apptio. We still are using workboard as IBM Targetprocess doesn't allow a Many to many OKR connection
Chose IBM Targetprocess
ServiceNow Now Platform, Broadcom Clarity and Jira Align
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Not using any other products that compare with Targetprocess. The reason we use Targetprocess is because its ability to integrate with other tool and specifically other IBM tools which provides organizations who already have made investments with other IBM tools like …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
IBM Targetprocess is more customizable and can adapt to the organization's needs than Jira Algin
Chose IBM Targetprocess
On par with these tools but with room for improvement
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Lower cost
Easier implementation
Less restrictive in terms of customisation
Chose IBM Targetprocess
We chose IBM Targetprocess because, in our opinion, IBM Targetprocess has Richer capabilities
Chose IBM Targetprocess
During our RFP and demo rating Apptio Targetprocess came out with the highest score by 3% and was the more cost effective of the closer rival. It rated the highest in 4 out of the 8 categories we graded and had one of the most cost effective implementation costs and ranked the …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Apptio Targetprocess outshone the competition on several benchmarks. The most important for our team was ease of administration, ease of configuration, cost of licenses, and ability to leverage the tool in multiple areas (not just project management or engineering). Apptio …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Apptio Targetprocess has more features and is more flexible for our users and its easier to develop automation rules and metrics than Atlassian Jira Alige or Planview AgilePlan.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
It’s better because of its flexibility and ability to support agile at scale as well as portfolio management in one tool.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
I wasn't a decisionmaker on the adoption of Apptio Targetprocess over the competitors so I can't clearly speak to this question.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Others weren't compared
Features
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryIBM Targetprocess
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
8.5
Ratings
13% above category average
IBM Targetprocess
6.9
Ratings
8% below category average
Task Management8.20 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Resource Management8.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.30 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Scheduling8.80 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology7.60 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Document Management8.70 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Email integration8.60 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Mobile Access8.70 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking8.70 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.60 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management8.30 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Search9.00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Visual planning tools9.00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
IBM Targetprocess
6.8
Ratings
13% below category average
DevOps Tool Integrations8.60 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Code Review7.40 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Code Collaboration7.70 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Velocity Calculation6.80 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers7.20 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryIBM Targetprocess
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryIBM Targetprocess
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryIBM Targetprocess
Likelihood to Recommend
It provides a cloud-based integrated development environment that integrates with other IBM Cloud services to provide a streamlined development workflow. This includes real-time collaboration and code sharing capabilities, making it easy for teams to work together on projects. This feature is very useful for our app to maintain the code
Read full review
Apptio Targetprocess is well suited to track work and progress of that work. In addition it is easy to tie that work to OKRs. Cost and hours rollup across the work hierarchy works well. Our users like the flexibility of Targetprocess and the ability to develop their own views and reports Scenarios where it is less appropriate is to do executive level reporting and develop reports that can pull in all of our time data since there is a 300k record limit
Read full review
Pros
  • It contains the deployment templates which are much more time saving and is of great use.
  • This has the integration of the Cloud applications which makes the work much more convenient.
  • This is flexible when it comes to development, deployment, and delivery.
  • [It] also has a much more reasonable pricing.
  • Provides space for the data storage.
  • [IBM Cloud Developer Tools] also can support many useful tools.
Read full review
  • Basic flexibility out of the box is a big advantage for a small company without resources to customize, as is needed for some of the larger competitors.
  • The support is second to none. They've even written custom TP queries to get me what I want.
  • They have managed to cover all the basics of product development in one product, in particular, the inclusion of customer support (although limited) is a big selling point for a small company.
Read full review
Cons
  • Its price is quite high and this made it unsuitable for us as we cannot afford such high rates.
  • Its Setup takes much longer time and this is frustrating.
  • Its interface needs to be improved and easy even for the Newbies.
Read full review
  • The UI is bit complex for new users who never used it. i think this can be sorted out by providing the steps to access?
  • dashboards with large datasets can cause performance lags or timeouts
  • Introduce more flexible, template-based RBAC configurations.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It's a great platform to develop, run, test and deploy the applications easily. And it makes very easier and secure the implementation of continuous delivery process. For first time and experts also can use this service so easily. Great service provided by the IBM Cloud Continuous Service. There are more services that helps a lot to work on it. Thanks a lot.
Read full review
Targetprocess is the most flexible application for tracking work among teams that we have found. This power comes from near limitless ability to customize your views on the work tracked in the system, and from the myriad reporting options to draw metrics and stats out of the data there. Custom fields, processes, and mashups all add to this flexibility and appeal.
Read full review
Usability
Nothing special to say : the UX is clear and simple.
Read full review
Overall Targetprocess's usability is good. the tool is easy to use and has features which most BUs and organizations can use. Additional features like AI integration would help the tool and its overall usability. providing additional dashboards for specific roles and executives within the tool would benefit Targetprocess with its scale
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Some minor outages are experienced, though these tend to pass within an hour usually and work can continue
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Reports are fast loading, considering they can refresh in a second or less and we have 7 years of work tracked in over 40k entities. Pages can load slowly when the views are very busy, but not frustratingly. I am a console user most of my career and generally prefer it over webUI interfaces, but Targetprocess won me over from the beginning and I spend half my day using it now.
Read full review
Support Rating
In more than a year using the IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery tool, I haven't had any major complaints or problems. However, in the last month, IBM suffered from a couple of problems through several of its services, and for a short period of time, I couldn't deploy successfully my projects. The problem was brief and was quickly fixed.
Read full review
TargetProcess' support is one of its strengths. The support team is very responsive and helpful when there is a problem but they're also proactive in providing good release notes and engaging with the community through a voting scheme to influence the priority of new features.
The team also releases new versions frequently with new features but with no knock-ons to currently working features.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
You should take some time to get everyone to agree how the system should be setup before work starts being tracked in Targetprocess, this avoids difficult and disruptive changes to processes or plugins later when everyone relies on it daily.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We chose IBM Cloud Developer Tools for multiple reasons. Cost, current infrastructure vendor list, and Cloud Operations team experience were key driving factors for us. Palo Alto's Prisma Cloud product was slick for sure but we found it more difficult to deploy and integrate with our current environment and applications
Read full review
Targetprocess was all around the better tool. They do not nickel-and-dime you and you don't have to deal with multiple products that do, or do not, integrate well together. Below are some of Targetprocess' biggest strengths:
  • Highly customizable; can fit the needs of almost any team
  • Robust reporting tool
  • Easy to use and administer
  • Provides all the functionality an agile org would be looking for
  • Support team and user guide are phenomenal.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We use the hosted version of Targetprocess and have never run into limitations or degraded performance due to scalability. Excellent performance over 7 years!
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • This has made the configuration files much easier to access.
  • Has made the commands more logical as well as easy for use and learning.
  • Contains great AI capabilities
  • The documentation needs improvement.
  • Error received from commands are pretty hard to understand.
Read full review
  • TargetProcess is my all-time favorite project management software that enables me to work collaboratively and also enthusiastically with my colleagues.
  • Before its invention, emails were difficult to handle in the past but now to make connections better I only trust this application because it’s a good intuitive to work in the form of group.
  • It provides me a quite useful view that facilitates my working in a way that I can create a customized view of all my ongoing projects.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Targetprocess Screenshots

Screenshot of Resource Management: Reduces risk by dynamically managing resources, capacity, and demandScreenshot of Program Management: To deliver value throughout a strategic portfolioScreenshot of Portfolio Budgeting: Shifting from project to product fundingScreenshot of Strategic Planning: Continuously links work, labor, and investments to business strategyScreenshot of Workforce ManagementScreenshot of Work