TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Cloud Object Storage vs. IBM Power Virtual Server vs. PhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Cloud Object Storage

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cloud Object Storage is an IBM Cloud product in the endpoint backup and IaaS categories. It is commonly used for data archiving and backup, for web and mobile applications, and as scalable, persistent storage for analytics.

    $0

    per month

    IBM Power Virtual Server

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AIBM presents their Power Systems Virtual Server as a scalable, cost-effective way to run IBM AIX, IBM i and Linux workloads​.N/A

    PhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud

    N/AN/ABare Metal Cloud is an API-driven dedicated servers platform with the flexibility of a Public Cloud solution. It enables automated provisioning of bare metal servers using API, CLI, or Infrastructure as Code tools. Its DevOps integrations and container management capabilities make it a platform capable of supporting teams looking to streamline their infrastructure management tasks and optimize their CI/CD pipelines. Bare Metal Cloud can be deployed on an hourly or monthly billing model,…

    $39

    per month

    Pricing
    IBM Cloud Object StorageIBM Power Virtual ServerPhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
    Editions & Modules
    One-Rate Plan
    As low as USD $12/TB a month
    per month
    Standard Plan
    Free up to 5GB—no minimum fee, pay only for what you use
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    General Purpose Instances
    starting at $0.08
    per hour
    Compute Instances
    starting at $0.42
    per hour
    Memory Instances
    starting at $1.10
    per hour
    Database Instances
    starting at $2.23
    per hour
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Cloud Object StorageIBM Power Virtual ServerPhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsThe One-Rate and Standard service plans for Cloud Object Storage include resiliency options, flexible data classes and built-in security. Pricing is based on the choice of location, storage class and resiliency choice.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM Cloud Object StorageIBM Power Virtual ServerPhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
    Considered Multiple Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    IBM Power Virtual Server has been easier to use in hybrid environments than any other options considered. Workload balancing works amazing. Our organization was already using IBM services for storage and managing databases, which influenced us to go for the service. Some of …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    One of the greatest alternatives to IBM Power System Virtual Server is Microsoft Azure. First, I'd want to point out that it's a lot more expensive than the competition. Because it is less expensive than other virtual servers, even small and medium-sized businesses may afford …
    Incentivized
    phoenixNAP
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    95%
    Would buy again
    62 Answers
    98%
    Would buy again
    193 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    61 Answers
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    187 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    62 Answers
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    194 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    96%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    47 Answers
    99%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    165 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    51 Answers
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    177 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM Cloud Object StorageIBM Power Virtual ServerPhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
    Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of IBM Cloud Object Storage and IBM Power Virtual Server and PhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
    Feature
    IBM Cloud Object Storage
    8.5
    156 Ratings
    3% above category average
    IBM Power Virtual Server
    8.6
    197 Ratings
    4% above category average
    PhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
    -
    Ratings
    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime6.8144 Ratings8.9195 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dynamic scaling8.9144 Ratings8.8195 Ratings00 Ratings
    Elastic load balancing9.0141 Ratings9.8189 Ratings00 Ratings
    Monitoring tools8.4145 Ratings7.0194 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security controls9.4150 Ratings8.0192 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pre-configured templates00 Ratings9.7190 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pre-defined machine images00 Ratings9.7191 Ratings00 Ratings
    Operating system support00 Ratings8.9193 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automation00 Ratings7.0168 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Cloud Object StorageIBM Power Virtual ServerPhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
    Small Businesses
    DigitalOcean Droplets
    Score9.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Object Storage
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Object Storage
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SAP on IBM Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    SAP on IBM Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    SAP on IBM Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Cloud Object StorageIBM Power Virtual ServerPhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (159 ratings)
    9.8
    (195 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.3
    (5 ratings)
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.1
    (8 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    5.8
    (4 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Cloud Object StorageIBM Power Virtual ServerPhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    In my experience, IBM Cloud Object Storage is well suited for projects like the one I am working on. This includes the use of natural language classification and the uploading of data to train a machine learning model for tag suggestions based on a body of text. Using IBM Cloud Object Storage has helped with this greatly. IBM Cloud Object Storage has also been great for Big Data Analytics thanks to its scalablilty and ease of use for large datasets. Alongside IBM Watson and our team's internal big data tools we've managed to process and analyze data more efficiently, leading to key insights that have driven business value for our clients.
    Read full review
    IBM
    It is really impactful in terms of scenarios like ERP systems and Data Analytics where heavy data needs to be analysed in terms of volume and their needs to be high scalability offering so in that scenario it is a great asset and features like distribution of workload using AI capabilities by leveraging modern IBM offerings like Watson is really helpful the area in which it could improve is native development of application in terms of adoption of New cloud Technologies
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    IBM
    • IBM Cloud Object Storage is an excellent choice for disaster recovery and backup solutions. Its high durability and geographic redundancy ensure that our backup data is safe and can be quickly restored in case of a disaster. This capability is crucial for maintaining our business continuity and minimizing downtime. We have deployed our loads in an IKS cluster distributed in 3 different AZs with stateful data allocated in COS.
    • We have a video streaming application and need to store and deliver a vast library of video content to millions of users worldwide, so we store our data in COS, which is cheap and reliable.
    • We have a bunch of data that must be analyzed and stored in datasets for fraud detection, risk management, and customer insights. In these cases, this data is moved from Onprem to IBM Cloud so we can use cheap storage like COS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • It is good in managing our documents in a precise manner.
    • It is a comprehensive tool and supports other languages like JAVA and Python and it is useful for us.
    • It is quite a valuable tool available at a reasonable price in the market and it is a scalable tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    IBM
    • Searching and retrieving—full-text search or metadata search—is one of the significant areas of improvement. It isn't easy to search for data with this.
    • Integration with other IBM cloud services is trickier. For example, integrating this with API Connect to access the data from API will be difficult for users.
    • Support - I think you should have more support community.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • The software appears to be geared for a no-programming approach, which implies that making changes is more difficult.
    • The user base is small making it monotonous and difficult to come up with new methods.
    • The number of rankings is not as large as competitors.
    • The admin end is poorly designed, as they are unable to receive and respond to client feedback.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    because it is a robust, safe and flexible product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Easy to understand the architecture, easy of implementation and support with perfect documentation. Results driven performance in terms of latency and speed. Able to perform heavy workloads and huge transformations, also integrated SAP systems and Oracle robust deployments. But looking more in terms of AI capabilities to achieve more innovation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IBM
    For my use cases, it has been a very smooth experience. Even my new colleagues have been able to get on top of things very quickly. This shows how easy it is to work with
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    It provides strong support for Terraform, Ansible, and API-based management gives power users flexibility and efficiency and IBM Cloud UI is modern and relatively easy to navigate. Interfaces and workflows are consistent with on-prem Power Systems management tools. Areas to be improved - Compared to AWS or Azure, the UI could be more streamlined in how it presents all related services (e.g., networking, logging, storage) that tie into PowerVS
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    We rarely face downtime or access issues with IBM Cloud Object Storage. It’s mostly available when we need it, even during peak hours or heavy data loads.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Very easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    IBM
    I would give it a 9 because it works smooth with our AI and analytics tools, no major slowdown. Pages and dashboards load fine most of the time, and reports finish in decent time even when data is heavy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    While there’s room for improvement, it generally works very well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    I have been working in IT sector for more than 15 years. I have worked with various vendors. IBM's sales team, support team have been really helpful. After we start to use their product, their UX design team also contacted us to get feedback from us. They are really interested about our experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    As with most IBM products the ongoing support for IBM Power Virtual Server is solid and consistent. IBM provides a clear roadmap for receiving support of their products. Both voice and online response is offered. It is obvious that IBM has the internal systems and culture to maintain support functions. This starts from the initial support call to the problem analysis and continues through the problem resolution. Documentation and communication are consistent within this process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    IBM
    I just researching and applying the tools on their platforms to ensure a good learning path, based on my needs. Reading the documentation related with resources, tools. Is too big, but I am trying to know more about it every day. It is a good way to know more about their resources. A new way to attract new customers. At the end of the day, we are all involved in improvement and automation of our tasks and resources for customers and end-users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    Yes Our organization used IBM professional services to implement IBM object storage because of its data consistency and multiple way to upload and download data and its encryption security features. Also that its brand matter for the any organization to secure the layer and storage. It sis also verify that application and system are compatibale for this product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    It is economic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Amazon S3 is a great service to safely back up your data where redundancy is guaranteed, and the cost is fair. In the past I have used Amazon S3 for data that we backup and hope we never need to access, but in the case of a catastrophic or even small slip of the finger with the delete command, we know our data and our client's data is safely backed up by Amazon S3. Amazon S3 service is a good option, but based on the features it provides compared with IBM Cloud Object Storage, it is less suitable. IBM Cloud Object Storage is also integrated with more services, like IBM Cloud SQL and IBM Aspera, which AWS does not provide to transfer files at maximum speed in the world.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    They both have their own ups and downs and it totally depends on the team which suits them best. IBM Power Virtual Server has Performance, Scalability, Reliability and Availability, Compatibility, and Good Vendor Support. The specific use case and workload requirements played a significant role. Some workloads may benefit from IBM Power Systems' architecture, while others may perform equally well on alternative platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    IBM
    Scaling up the number of users can lead to significant increases in licensing costs, which, while not a technical limitation, can be a practical constraint for some organizations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Built to handle thousands of concurrent users, high query loads, and massive datasets especially in data-heavy industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. In-memory processing, dynamic query optimization, and intelligent caching mechanisms help it scale efficiently under load. You can configure clusters of Cognos servers to distribute workload and ensure high availability, even during peak usage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • This allows us to recommend a platform to our clients that will quickly help them create new, efficient business processes with very little development.
    • This saves clients hours and days of manual analysis of images, allowing the system to do the work when attaching Object Storage to models.
    • There is a learning curve in utilizing the storage and the modeling, but once up and running, it works well during deployment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • We have had a return on investment of 30%.
    • There have also been 80% fewer application crashes due to a lack of resources that previously ran on the X86 platform.
    • Administration management has been simplified and staff can dedicate themselves to the development of applications, instead of providing support to users when the applications do not respond efficiently, this made staff 45% more productive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    phoenixNAP
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots

    IBM Cloud Object Storage Screenshots

    Screenshot of Cloud Object Storage set upScreenshot of storage bucket creationScreenshot of the Access Management interfaceScreenshot of the interface to create, add and management of Storage BucketsScreenshot of data uploadingScreenshot of usage details

    PhoenixNAP Bare Metal Cloud Screenshots

    Screenshot of Bare Metal Cloud BillingScreenshot of Bare Metal Cloud Bandwidth PackagesScreenshot of Deploy new serverScreenshot of Rancher solution