IBM Cloud Object Storage is an IBM Cloud product in the endpoint backup and IaaS categories. It is commonly used for data archiving and backup, for web and mobile applications, and as scalable, persistent storage for analytics.
$0
per month
PeopleFluent
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.
N/A
Pricing
IBM Cloud Object Storage
PeopleFluent
Editions & Modules
One-Rate Plan
As low as USD $12/TB a month
per month
Standard Plan
Free up to 5GB—no minimum fee, pay only for what you use
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Object Storage
PeopleFluent
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
The One-Rate and Standard service plans for Cloud Object Storage include resiliency options, flexible data classes and built-in security. Pricing is based on the choice of location, storage class and resiliency choice.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud Object Storage
PeopleFluent
Features
IBM Cloud Object Storage
PeopleFluent
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Object Storage
8.7
155 Ratings
6% above category average
PeopleFluent
-
Ratings
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime
6.1143 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic scaling
9.8143 Ratings
00 Ratings
Elastic load balancing
8.9140 Ratings
00 Ratings
Monitoring tools
8.8144 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security controls
9.9149 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Object Storage
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.0
11 Ratings
10% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Object Storage
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.2
11 Ratings
11% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Object Storage
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.5
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
4.06 Ratings
Manager note taking
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
7.08 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Object Storage
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.3
8 Ratings
7% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Object Storage
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
9.5
8 Ratings
29% above category average
Job Requisition Management
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Company Website Posting
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Customized Application Form
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Resume Management
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
00 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
Candidate Search
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Collaboration
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Email Templates
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
User Permissions
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
In my experience, IBM Cloud Object Storage is well suited for projects like the one I am working on. This includes the use of natural language classification and the uploading of data to train a machine learning model for tag suggestions based on a body of text. Using IBM Cloud Object Storage has helped with this greatly. IBM Cloud Object Storage has also been great for Big Data Analytics thanks to its scalablilty and ease of use for large datasets. Alongside IBM Watson and our team's internal big data tools we've managed to process and analyze data more efficiently, leading to key insights that have driven business value for our clients.
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
IBM Cloud Object Storage is an excellent choice for disaster recovery and backup solutions. Its high durability and geographic redundancy ensure that our backup data is safe and can be quickly restored in case of a disaster. This capability is crucial for maintaining our business continuity and minimizing downtime. We have deployed our loads in an IKS cluster distributed in 3 different AZs with stateful data allocated in COS.
We have a video streaming application and need to store and deliver a vast library of video content to millions of users worldwide, so we store our data in COS, which is cheap and reliable.
We have a bunch of data that must be analyzed and stored in datasets for fraud detection, risk management, and customer insights. In these cases, this data is moved from Onprem to IBM Cloud so we can use cheap storage like COS.
It was very easy to go through resumes, choose the people you wanted to interview and set up the interviews.
It is great at keeping track of people that have come through hiring process in the past so you do not waste time on those that have already been declined or are sent in by multiple vendors.
The handling of time sheets and expense reports is very easy to manage.
Searching and retrieving—full-text search or metadata search—is one of the significant areas of improvement. It isn't easy to search for data with this.
Integration with other IBM cloud services is trickier. For example, integrating this with API Connect to access the data from API will be difficult for users.
Support - I think you should have more support community.
The interface is a little confusing. I'm not sure if it's something that can be fixed in implementations, or if it's inherent to PeopleFluent, but there are almost too many tabs asking for too much information. A lot of it can be repetitive as well.
Changing your password/resetting your password seems to be nightmarish. It requires an organization ID as well as security questions, and forces you to reset your password far too often. I really dislike that feature.
Honestly, PeopleFluent itself looks pretty outdated. I feel as though the entire application really needs a facelift to be more current.
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
For my use cases, it has been a very smooth experience. Even my new colleagues have been able to get on top of things very quickly. This shows how easy it is to work with
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
We rarely face downtime or access issues with IBM Cloud Object Storage. It’s mostly available when we need it, even during peak hours or heavy data loads.
I would give it a 9 because it works smooth with our AI and analytics tools, no major slowdown. Pages and dashboards load fine most of the time, and reports finish in decent time even when data is heavy.
I have been working in IT sector for more than 15 years. I have worked with various vendors. IBM's sales team, support team have been really helpful. After we start to use their product, their UX design team also contacted us to get feedback from us. They are really interested about our experience.
I would rate this ATS system a 9 as there's some room for improvement as mentioned prior. I really love the design and its functionality buttons and the way I can integrate it with other systems. I would really love to see a more detailed reporting metrics long with super candidate filters when searching profiles.
I just researching and applying the tools on their platforms to ensure a good learning path, based on my needs. Reading the documentation related with resources, tools. Is too big, but I am trying to know more about it every day. It is a good way to know more about their resources. A new way to attract new customers. At the end of the day, we are all involved in improvement and automation of our tasks and resources for customers and end-users.
Yes Our organization used IBM professional services to implement IBM object storage because of its data consistency and multiple way to upload and download data and its encryption security features. Also that its brand matter for the any organization to secure the layer and storage. It sis also verify that application and system are compatibale for this product
Amazon S3 is a great service to safely back up your data where redundancy is guaranteed, and the cost is fair. In the past I have used Amazon S3 for data that we backup and hope we never need to access, but in the case of a catastrophic or even small slip of the finger with the delete command, we know our data and our client's data is safely backed up by Amazon S3. Amazon S3 service is a good option, but based on the features it provides compared with IBM Cloud Object Storage, it is less suitable. IBM Cloud Object Storage is also integrated with more services, like IBM Cloud SQL and IBM Aspera, which AWS does not provide to transfer files at maximum speed in the world.
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their liking. Not to mention it's a very popular tool that i have had the pleasure of working in twice now with two different organizations.
Scaling up the number of users can lead to significant increases in licensing costs, which, while not a technical limitation, can be a practical constraint for some organizations
This allows us to recommend a platform to our clients that will quickly help them create new, efficient business processes with very little development.
This saves clients hours and days of manual analysis of images, allowing the system to do the work when attaching Object Storage to models.
There is a learning curve in utilizing the storage and the modeling, but once up and running, it works well during deployment.
I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.