TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Cognos Analytics vs. Microsoft BI (MSBI) vs. Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Cognos Analytics

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cognos is a full-featured business intelligence suite by IBM, designed for larger deployments. It comprises Query Studio, Reporting Studio, Analysis Studio and Event Studio, and Cognos Administration along with tools for Microsoft Office integration, full-text search, and dashboards.

    $11.25

    per month per user

    Microsoft BI (MSBI)

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft BI is a business intelligence product used for data analysis and generating reports on server-based data. It features unlimited data analysis capacity with its reporting engine, SQL Server Reporting Services alongside ETL, master data management, and data cleansing.

    $14

    per month per user

    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ATagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsMicrosoft BI (MSBI)Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Editions & Modules
    On Demand - Standard
    USD 11.25
    per month per user
    On Demand - Premium
    USD 44.90
    per month per user
    Power BI Pro
    $14
    per month per user
    Power BI Premium
    $24
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsMicrosoft BI (MSBI)Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Free Trial
    YesNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsMicrosoft BI (MSBI)Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Considered Multiple Products
    IBM
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    IBM is a titan in BI innovation but has arduous competitors as I mentioned before. IBM has prestige in BI and the directors and managers know that. On the other hand, complexity is not the strategy of Cognos, that's why if you need big cubes of data, Tableau, and Microsoft BI …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    Microsoft Power BI has a more user friendly interface and it is integrated very well with the other Microsoft products but IBM Cognos Analytics has a more advanced reporting and complex data analysis capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    Cost wise, the above products are less expensive and offer tons more upfront, but you will pay for it on the back end. They have vendor limitations and their support mechanism was inline for what we wanted.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    It was cost prohibitive to switch platforms we have a huge investment in our Cognos implementation. There was retooling costs for our resources training costs for our users as well as a million $ plus investment in licensing costs. We could have considered a move to the cloud …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    There are a number of reporting systems, but these other systems are really data visualization systems that lack the ability deliver information through an enterprise on their own. IBM Cognos is well suited to be the delivery system for an enterprise's analytics and the …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    MS BI: A lot of times we meet customers who are dealing with an MS BI maintenance nightmare and we try to ease their pain by implementing Cognos BI and their reporting and analysis system. Cognos BI is better than MS BI from ease of implementation to production support and …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    Cognos has better functionality and it is easier to develop once the package is ready. On the other hand SSRS doesn't need a package, just a connection to DB.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    IBM Cognos is a separate product but it allows us to connect to any databases and databases from Microsoft Analysis Services as well. This feature made me choose Cognos.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    MSRS was relatively new
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    Each of the solutions has their pros and cons, but Microsoft's BI offerings provide the best "bang for the buck." Few solutions available offer the breadth of feature functionality in a single package, with BI and database generally being sold as separate offerings. However, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    We initially considered Google Analytics, but eventually decided against it due to the licensing terms and the associated software that we would need to incorporate. IBM Cognos is great at what it does, as long as you are trying to integrate with software that is on their …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    Specific data displays are some of the strongest aspects of Microsoft BI when compared to alternate programs. It also does a superior job in compatibility with many programs, especially those from Microsoft. Since my company primarily uses Office 365 and other Microsoft …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    Microsoft BI is mainly based on Microsoft SQL Server, so it is perfectly integrated. Many of the Microsoft BI components require using SQL Server as the database engine. Generally, the functionalities that are achieved when using SQL Server as a database engine are greater than …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    One of the main reasons Microsoft BI was chosen by our company is because it is a reliable program. We tried different programs in the past (and currently also use other ones for certain reporting and analysis needs) but Microsoft BI was the least buggy out of our top choices.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    -Tableau is clearly more cutting edge when it comes to data visualization and connecting to multiple data sources (support for MongoDB, Hadoop, etc).
    -Assuming your data is not that sophisticated, Microsoft BI is a great product. I would say its a good "all around" BI tool. It …
    Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    IBM Cognos, Informatica,and MicroStrategy. We picked the Microsoft solution primarily due to the best TCO and match for our requirements.
    Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    OBIEE, Cognos, and Business Objects. Microsoft BI provided ETL, basic reporting, and cubes for analytics at a reasonable price.
    Wolters Kluwer
    Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    We have been using CCH Tagetik for uploading Financial data from our other ERP system such as ACCPAC, Navision, Talent etc.. My experience with SAP was using them as ERP system. Thus can't really do a lot of comparison between the two system. The main reason why CCH Tagetik was …
    Incentivized
    Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Better workflow capabilities Strongest solution for consolidation Easy to maintain and finance owned
    Incentivized
    Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    CCH Tagetik was in the end the best choice for us. As I was not directly involved in the decision making process, I don't have all the details, but a combination of costanalysis, ease-of-use, migration-analysis and the fact that CCH Tagetik has a dutch office almost in walking …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    97%
    Would buy again
    95 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    15 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    18 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    81 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    15 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    18 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    94 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    15 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    18 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    57 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    13 Answers
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    67 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    Features
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsMicrosoft BI (MSBI)Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.7
    141 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    9.0
    53 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.1
    10 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports7.6132 Ratings8.546 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards8.0139 Ratings9.653 Ratings8.58 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates7.5134 Ratings8.951 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.9
    141 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    8.5
    53 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    7.4
    24 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Drill-down analysis7.4139 Ratings8.548 Ratings6.623 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities8.3142 Ratings8.253 Ratings7.123 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages7.299 Ratings8.342 Ratings7.17 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration8.6136 Ratings8.953 Ratings8.716 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    9.2
    139 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    8.5
    52 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.4
    15 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Publish to Web9.838 Ratings9.348 Ratings9.910 Ratings
    Publish to PDF8.3135 Ratings9.148 Ratings9.913 Ratings
    Report Versioning9.836 Ratings7.344 Ratings7.712 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling8.2137 Ratings8.547 Ratings9.911 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers9.820 Ratings8.426 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.4
    127 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    8.7
    52 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.5
    8 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.9124 Ratings9.651 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization8.0117 Ratings8.748 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics6.7113 Ratings7.745 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.950 Ratings8.76 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.8
    133 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    9.3
    53 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.8
    23 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)7.5132 Ratings9.449 Ratings9.923 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model7.5130 Ratings9.347 Ratings9.922 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)7.4130 Ratings8.949 Ratings9.923 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control8.260 Ratings9.36 Ratings9.94 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)8.6114 Ratings9.431 Ratings9.216 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    6.3
    111 Ratings
    21% below category average
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    8.0
    42 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    6.1
    9 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access6.7106 Ratings8.139 Ratings5.08 Ratings
    Mobile Application6.392 Ratings8.030 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.698 Ratings7.739 Ratings7.16 Ratings
    Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
    Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    9.1
    89 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    8.5
    24 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    REST API7.685 Ratings9.221 Ratings00 Ratings
    Javascript API7.781 Ratings8.821 Ratings00 Ratings
    iFrames9.914 Ratings8.820 Ratings00 Ratings
    Java API9.915 Ratings8.718 Ratings00 Ratings
    Themeable User Interface (UI)9.917 Ratings8.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable Platform (Open Source)9.911 Ratings7.219 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.4
    49 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Long-term financial planning00 Ratings00 Ratings8.235 Ratings
    Financial budgeting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.143 Ratings
    Forecasting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.240 Ratings
    Scenario modeling00 Ratings00 Ratings8.634 Ratings
    Management reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.046 Ratings
    Consolidation and Close
    Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.8
    46 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Financial data consolidation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.940 Ratings
    Journal entries and reports00 Ratings00 Ratings8.337 Ratings
    Multi-currency management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.334 Ratings
    Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings00 Ratings9.337 Ratings
    Minority Ownership00 Ratings00 Ratings8.730 Ratings
    Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.944 Ratings
    Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings00 Ratings8.236 Ratings
    Financial Reporting and Compliance
    Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.0
    50 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.042 Ratings
    Management Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.947 Ratings
    Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.150 Ratings
    Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.035 Ratings
    XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings00 Ratings9.920 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.2
    31 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Personalized dashboards00 Ratings00 Ratings8.426 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    KPIs00 Ratings00 Ratings8.624 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings8.322 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Integration
    Comparison of Integration features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Microsoft BI (MSBI) and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft BI (MSBI)
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.2
    47 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Flat file integration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.339 Ratings
    Excel data integration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.145 Ratings
    Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings00 Ratings9.131 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsMicrosoft BI (MSBI)Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Small Businesses
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    IBM Planning Analytics
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Jaspersoft Community Edition
    Score7 out of 10
    Jaspersoft Community Edition
    Score7 out of 10
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score7.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsMicrosoft BI (MSBI)Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (161 ratings)
    8.9
    (77 ratings)
    9.0
    (50 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.4
    (31 ratings)
    8.0
    (25 ratings)
    9.1
    (11 ratings)
    Usability
    7.3
    (10 ratings)
    8.9
    (19 ratings)
    8.7
    (18 ratings)
    Availability
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (9 ratings)
    8.9
    (15 ratings)
    9.1
    (6 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    6.9
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.5
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    9.6
    (7 ratings)
    5.5
    (3 ratings)
    Configurability
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    8.6
    (40 ratings)
    8.5
    (42 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sources
    8.3
    (40 ratings)
    8.4
    (41 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    5.5
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    6.4
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsMicrosoft BI (MSBI)Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    We are a larger, more established company with a backlog of data in Excel and multiple departments. Everything was on Excel sheets in a file being run manually monthly. I think it is a good bridge for a company that was stuck in the 2000's but isn't ready to come to 2026 yet. It's for a company that needs a reporting solution and has needed it for quite some time but not a techy company with lots of integration issues and reports in 5 different places.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft BI has a lot of features and is a very powerful tool, especially if you have folks on your team that know how to utilize all of its capabilities. To truly unlock all that it can do, it does require people to have a deep understanding of its capabilities. That's where the software really shines. If you are looking for a simpler, more basic reporting tool, there are other programs available that do not require such a steep learning curve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Scenarios where CCH Tagetik is suitable is when a company have large amounts of data and want to transform, consolidate, store and produce reporting in different year, period etc with complex calculations and allocation. Tagetik is the tool for you in this case and it's very flexible in terms of creating your own business rule, calculation and reporting options with a user friendly interface. I have not thought about scenarios where it is not appropriate to use tagetik yet as the tool covers small and large business financial needs
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Enterprise reporting - Create, customise, and run reports on sales trends, consumer sentiment, etc.
    • Dashboard creation and data exploration & analysis - Using drag and drop feature to create ad-hoc visualisation. Additionally, using AI powered natural language query feature for data analysis and dashboard input (formation of pie, bar, line charts). It's useful for no-technical person to put queries around the spreadsheet data to get quick answers.
    • Building insights for accurate decision making - Package reports with data backed insights for stakeholders in pdf, and Excel format to support business ad-hoc cases, forecasting and strategic recommendations on relevant asks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Comparatively easy to use compared to other data analytics solutions, collaborating with other colleagues on data work is simple.
    • Using Visual Studio for database, ETL, reporting, and analytics development save time and money.
    • Transfer of data from one application to another via Excel and comparison of data attributes between applications
    • Dashboard functionality, as well as Python support, are available, allowing you to add additional charts and graphs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
    • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
    • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
    • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
    • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • IBM Cognos Analytics enables customer data segmentation, which is essential for marketing, improving and streamlining purchasing behavior and preferences. This helps companies create more targeted and effective marketing campaigns.
    • Our clients Through data analysis, we can identify and observe trends in the behavior of other clients, allowing us to anticipate needs and adjust strategies to avoid consequences.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • MSBI designs can work on increasing data processing capabilities enough to handle the huge datasets etc.
    • It would be a lot better if it is a little low on cost.
    • it needs to create opportunities little more than they do regarding customization of some very unique visualization effects
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Online help and manual is a bonus but could be improved e.g. the clarity of English explanations.
    • Improved Excel compatibility e.g. formula driven reporting and dash boarding.
    • Mobile phone connectivity e.g. launching a consolidation from a Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik app.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    For an existing solution, renewing licenses does provide a good return on investment. Additionally, while rolling out scorecards and dashboards with little adhoc capabilities, to end users, cognos is very easily scalable. It also allows to create a solution that has a mix of OLAP and relational data-sources, which is a limitation with other tools. Synchronizing with existing security setup is easy too.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft BI is fundamental to our suite of BI applications. That being said, Northcraft Analytics is focused on delighting our customers, so if the underlying factors of our decision change, we would choose to re-write our BI applications on a different stack. Luckily, mathematics are the fundamental IP of our technology... and is portable across all BI platforms for the foreseeable future.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Because in my oppinion Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik is one of the most usable tools for consolidation, planning (controlling) and reporting. Its usability is quite easy and innovative. I like the data entry method for the customers with its workflow and tasks, quite easy way to implement a co pilot. And i like the reporting tool, with a lot of customization opportunities.
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    We have a strong user base (3500 users) that are highly utilizing this tool. Basic users are able to consume content within the applied security model. We have a set of advanced users that really push the limits of Cognos with Report and Query Studio. These users have created a lot of personal content and stored it in 'My Reports'. Users enjoy this flexibility.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    The Microsoft BI tools have great usability for both developers and end users alike. For developers familiar with Visual Studio, there is little learning curve. For those not, the single Visual Studio IDE means not having to learn separate tools for each component. For end-users, the web interface for SSRS is simple to navigate with intuitive controls. For ad-hoc analysis, Excel can connect directly to SSAS and provide a pivot table like experience which is familiar to many users. For database development, there is beginning to be some confusion, as there are now three tool choices (VS, SSMS, Azure Data Studio) for developers. I would like to see Azure Data Studio become the superset of SSMS and eventually supplant it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Surprisingly, this platform is a powerhouse ERP system. However, given time, when more and more organization is able to identify how powerful this tool can be, CCH Tagetik is able to stand as a competitive advantage to many of the Financial industry of today. Although, it needs time to understand the logic behind how CCH Tagetik is formed and setup, once it is known to the user, it is an easy day to day operations with minimal maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    Reports can typically be viewed through any browser that can access the server, so the availability is ultimately up to what the company utilizing it is comfortable with allowing, though report development tends to be more picky about browsers and settings as mentioned above. It also has an optional iPad app and general mobile browsing support, but dashboards lack the mobile compatibility. What keeps it from getting a higher score is the desktop tools that are vital to the development process. The compatibility with only Windows when the server has a wide range of compatibility can be a real sore point for a company that outfits its employees exclusively with Mac or Linux machines. Of course, if they are planning on outsourcing the development anyways, it's a rather moot point
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    The product has been reliable.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    Overall no major complaints but it doesn't handle DMR (Dimensionally Modeled for Relational) very well. DMR modelling is a capability that IBM Cognos Framework Manager provides allowing you to specify dimensional information for relational metadata and allows for OLAP-style queries. However, the capability is not very efficient and, for example, if I'm using only 2 columns on a 20-column model, the software is not smart enough to exclude 18 columns and the query side gets progressively larger and larger until it's effectively unusable.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) can drag at times. We created two report servers and placed them under an F5 load balancer. This configuration has worked well. We have seen sluggish performance at times due to the Windows Firewall.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    Why is their web application not working as fast as you think it should? They never know, and it is always a a bunch of shots in the dark to find out. Trying to download software from them is like trying to find a book at the library before computers were invented.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    MSBI natively has a site that allows you to vote on user enhancements and bug fixes. This allows the largest nagging issues to float to the top and the development team can prioritize accordingly. As mentioned earlier, the large community base of MSBI developers assist technical resources in handling technical questions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    I got very quick respons. After very little mail iterations, they decided to have online meeting to look together with me to the issue. They tried to solve it during the meeting. I had the impression that the customer care person really knew the system and was able to ask help from other colleagues when needed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    IBM
    Onsite training provided by IBM Cognos was effective and as expected. They did not perform training with our data which was a bit difficult for our end-users.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    This training was more directed toward what the product was capable of rather than actual programming.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    At the official deployment of the original product Controlling and Accounting teams went to Lucca and were walked through the product, Excel usage, Design, ETL run
    Read full review
    Online Training
    IBM
    The online courses they offer are thorough and presented in such a way that someone who isn't already familiar with the general design methodologies used in this field will be capable of making a good design. The training environments are provided as a fully self contained virtual machine with everything needed already to create the environments. We've had some persisting issues with the environments becoming unavailable, but support has been responsive when these issues arise and straightening them out for us
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I have used on-line training from Microsoft and from Pragmatic Works. I would recommend Pragmatic Works as the best way to get up to speed quickly, and then use the Microsoft on-line training to deep dive into specific features that you need to get depth with.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    several times since the deployment of the product in 2013 we got on-line training on new functions or on very specific questions/issues (e.g. ETL customisation), followed by the usage of the Learning Hub since 2025
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    Make sure that any custom tables that you have, are built into your metadata packages. You can still access them via SQL queries in Cognos, but it is much easier to have them as a part of the available metadata packages.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We are a consulting firm and as such our best resources are always billing on client projects. Our internal implementation has weaknesses, but that's true for any company like ours. My rating is based on the product's ease of implementation.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Cognos has the edge over Crystal Reports because you have to create any ODBC/JDBC setups. Cognos provides the ability to created scheduled reports where as SAP requires additional parameters to achieve this functionality. This next thing that I'm about to mention serves as a BIG advantage - Crystal Reports has to be installed onto each User's PC which is time consuming for a Bank that has hundreds of Employees where as Cognos of course doesn't require this process as its a cloud app and even better, Users sign into to the app via SSO (Single Sign On).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We have used the built in ConnectWise Manager reports and custom reports. The reports provide static data. PowerBI shows us live data we can drill down into and easily adjust parameters. It's much more useful than a static PDF report.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the application is much easier. IBM Cognos TM1 had a lot of issues with certain modules that could not be open concurrently; this would often lead to phantom data being entered in the system. I have not had these issues with CCH Tagetik.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    We rate IBM Cognos Analytics a 9 out of 10 for overall scalability. The platform handles large numbers of users, reports, and analytical workloads very reliably. We have experienced strong performance even in demanding enterprise environments with substantial data volumes. Its architecture provides sufficient flexibility to scale resources according to demand, making it well suited for large, business-critical deployments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • The platform can be pretty pricey.
    • Convoluted contracts and they fine you for any breach during audits.
    • Things are changed between releases without any warning and break.
    • It is second to none at being able to customize list and crosstab type reports.
    • You can easily set up a report to be emailed out every day and even have it export the report to a shared folder.
    • On-prem environments can be scaled up pretty much as much as you would like.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • As a SaaS provider we see being able to provide self-service BI to our client users as a competitive advantage. In fact the MSSQL enabled BI is a contributing factor to many winning RFPs we have done for prospective client organisations.
    • However MSSQL BI requires extensive knowledge and skills to design and develop data warehouses & data models as a foundation to support business analysts and users to interrogate data effectively and efficiently. Often times we find having strong in-house MSSQL expertise is a bless.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Gave us a tool that can absolutely grow with us to help multi phase implementations.
    • A significant time savings in terms of the amount of time we used to spend running reports vs. the time we spend now. Unbelievable improvement.
    • Gives us the option to use CCH Tagetik to solve business problems that perhaps we didn't have when we implemented CCH Tagetik. It gives us options without the possibility of implementing a whole other software package.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM Cognos Analytics Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

    Screenshot of Homepage