IBM Cognos Analytics vs. Numetric vs. OpenText Magellan

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cognos Analytics
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cognos is a full-featured business intelligence suite by IBM, designed for larger deployments. It comprises Query Studio, Reporting Studio, Analysis Studio and Event Studio, and Cognos Administration along with tools for Microsoft Office integration, full-text search, and dashboards.
$11.25
per month per user
Numetric
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Numetric is an easy-to-use BI tool for non-experts. It can handle data centralization, data cleaning, as well as analysis and publishing.N/A
OpenText Magellan
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.N/A
Pricing
IBM Cognos AnalyticsNumetricOpenText Magellan
Editions & Modules
On Demand - Standard
USD 11.25
per month per user
On Demand - Premium
USD 44.90
per month per user
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cognos AnalyticsNumetricOpenText Magellan
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cognos AnalyticsNumetricOpenText Magellan
Considered Multiple Products
IBM Cognos Analytics
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
i believe that CA is more powerful, has better modelling, and is not held back by a cumbersome method of re-using data models. The only thing that holds it back is the complexity of licensing.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos Analytics is robust in terms of reporting, governance and scheduling while Power BI excels in use, interactivity and visuals. In nutshell, IBM Cognos Analytics has edge over Power BI for enterprise grade , structured reporting needs.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
We chose IBM Cognos Analytics because, in our experience, IBM Cognos Analytics was Better, had more feature functionality, and is easier to use
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
have been using since it's creation
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Microsoft Power BI and MicroStrategy Analytics
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
We chose IBM Cognos Analytics because, in our opinion, IBM Cognos Analytics has Better enterprise integration
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Much more powerful and complete
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Power BI is stronger for quick ad-hoc analysis and dashboards, but IBM Cognos Analytics is better when consistency, precision, and mass distribution matter. Tableau is best for interactive analysis, while IBM Cognos Analytics is better for standardized, repeatable enterprise …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos Analytics was more matured enterprise modeling-based tool. Our power Bi struggled against large ERP data sets, which IBM didn't after few initial days.

IBM had much better scalability and security when comes to user reports distribution. The schedule feature worked …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Compared to other tools like Power BI, Tableau, and Google studio, IBM Cognos Analytics is better for the companies who looks strong control on detailed reports. Power BI and Tableau are easy to use and good for quick presentation, but Cognos has more options for security, such …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Tableau, Power BI, QlikView were the other options considered. Tableau lacked the following key components of business intelligence and analytics. Some other statistical functions that are available on the platform were not matched by Power BI. QlikView lacked robust …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
We selected IBM Cognos Analytics based on the following. The scalable and robust features for large organizations allowing it to grow as we do. The nest feature is the strong data governance and security features. It also supports a wide variety of data sources. Lastly, it …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
It was due to trust in IBM. Very good support provide by IBM. Response time is pretty good
Product is proven in past & well robust feature
Many good enterprises have used this product
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
My company selected IBM Congos Analytics because of its advanced features and data representation for data analysis. Its row and column features are very effective for creating dashboards and reports to visualize data. It's chart representation and view format are very …
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Not to be compared. Completely different products.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
It does well however, we need more user friendly interfaces, integration options and visualizations.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos Analytics is our legacy BI solution. It hadn't stacked up well against its modern contemporaries. We are thinking of replacing it with Microsoft BI.
Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
Cognos provides very advanced analytics functionalities, maybe even more advanced than the competition, and works great when used in collaboration with Watson. However, Tableau and other newer products are much better regarding overall usability.
Numetric
OpenText Magellan
Chose OpenText Magellan
There is multiple software available in the market to do the reporting and text analytics. Generally, analysts prefer using Python or R. Or we try to use any API available. This software can fulfill almost 80% of those needs without writing the codes. It has the integration …
Chose OpenText Magellan
OpenText Magellan can produce reports that are much more elaborate than PowerBI, which is ideal for users that just need to see a report. On the other hand, PowerBI seems to be better at allowing users to interact with data.
Chose OpenText Magellan
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving …
Chose OpenText Magellan
Actuate has been in the industry a while and the open source community make going with Actuate's BIRT a stable decision. Changing report engines can be expensive, so going with a company with a good reputation helps long-term.
Chose OpenText Magellan
I've used JReports and Actuate is very similar but seems to have a lot more customization features for the end user of BIRT reports.
Chose OpenText Magellan
Actuate has a HUGE number of features that can tie nicely into almost any ERP but it takes some time to learn and the development community was relatively small compared to the Crystal Reports alternative. Crystal was far easier to learn and had a massive support base. Probably …
Chose OpenText Magellan
We looked at a few other competitor's products but based on value for features chose Actuate for its total cost of ownership.
Features
IBM Cognos AnalyticsNumetricOpenText Magellan
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.6
Ratings
7% below category average
Numetric
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
OpenText Magellan
7.0
Ratings
16% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.70 Ratings8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.5
Ratings
7% below category average
Numetric
9.3
Ratings
15% above category average
OpenText Magellan
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Drill-down analysis6.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.30 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
5.8
Ratings
34% below category average
Numetric
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
Ratings
2% above category average
Publish to Web6.40 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.80 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Versioning3.60 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.40 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers2.70 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.0
Ratings
13% below category average
Numetric
10.0
Ratings
22% above category average
OpenText Magellan
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.70 Ratings10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.50 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.4
Ratings
14% below category average
Numetric
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
OpenText Magellan
9.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.10 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)6.70 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.20 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
6.3
Ratings
21% below category average
Numetric
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
7.0
Ratings
10% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access6.60 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Mobile Application6.50 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.50 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Numetric
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
6.2
Ratings
22% below category average
REST API7.10 Ratings00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Javascript API7.30 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
iFrames8.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API6.90 Ratings00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)7.10 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)7.80 Ratings00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cognos AnalyticsNumetricOpenText Magellan
Small Businesses
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.6 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.6 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cognos AnalyticsNumetricOpenText Magellan
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
5.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
2.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cognos AnalyticsNumetricOpenText Magellan
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM Cognos Analytics has great scheduling capabilities. A single report can be parameterized (e.g., “Store Manager ID”) and burst to thousands of recipients with their slice of data.IBM Cognos Analytics is a good fit for highly complex, multi-level calculations which can be handled by Report Studio. For example Monthly balance sheet that requires multi step calculation
Read full review
It is very well suited to manipulate large quantities of data.
Read full review
It depends on extensibility, set-up, access & style. Actuate performs fairly well, but has performance issues because it sits on top of eclipse, which sits on top of Java. Extensibility usually comes at that price. Set-up is fairly straightforward and it can be secured.
Read full review
Pros
  • Data Visualization: Plenty of options exist for multiple use cases, and dashboards are easy to implement and customize.
  • Integration with IBM Watson: makes it easy to use Watson AI features (NLP etc.) on your data.
  • Its advanced analytics functionalities with powerful pattern detection/prediction models.
Read full review
  • It gives me all of the available data for a particular roadway and allows me to define the filters I need to search for particular crash types on that roadway.
  • I like the map or satellite views of the maps. This is very helpful in being able to see the terrain when I have identified a particular crash of interest.
  • There is a graphic display for every type of crash data that is entered from the police report.
Read full review
  • Ability to connect to different kinds of sources, including web services, and customize those queries to the extend needed
  • Provide tools to customize the look & feel of the reports as much as needed, even being able to choose different appearances for different outputs
  • Allowing scripting in the reports extends the functionality available
  • Allowing to embed reports without further licensing and maintaining all the functionality
Read full review
Cons
  • IBM Cognos Analytics enables customer data segmentation, which is essential for marketing, improving and streamlining purchasing behavior and preferences. This helps companies create more targeted and effective marketing campaigns.
  • Our clients Through data analysis, we can identify and observe trends in the behavior of other clients, allowing us to anticipate needs and adjust strategies to avoid consequences.
Read full review
  • I would like to print a PDF of the map showing the crash locations. Currently, I use the snipping tool to create an image of the map.
Read full review
  • Report rendering can take a long time for large reports (250,000+ pages) - we run these in batch over night
  • The deployment of production code from development to test to production enviroments can be complex due to the number of components that must compile
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It took my BI team one year to become productive at developing useful content on the IBM Cognos platform. After this year, the reports being developed for a client were stale and no longer relative to the ever changing needs of the business client. Given the same opportunity, I would select a platform that allows the team to quickly produce BI content. Fail fast and recover quickly!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
Read full review
Usability
We have a strong user base (3500 users) that are highly utilizing this tool. Basic users are able to consume content within the applied security model. We have a set of advanced users that really push the limits of Cognos with Report and Query Studio. These users have created a lot of personal content and stored it in 'My Reports'. Users enjoy this flexibility.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Reports can typically be viewed through any browser that can access the server, so the availability is ultimately up to what the company utilizing it is comfortable with allowing, though report development tends to be more picky about browsers and settings as mentioned above. It also has an optional iPad app and general mobile browsing support, but dashboards lack the mobile compatibility. What keeps it from getting a higher score is the desktop tools that are vital to the development process. The compatibility with only Windows when the server has a wide range of compatibility can be a real sore point for a company that outfits its employees exclusively with Mac or Linux machines. Of course, if they are planning on outsourcing the development anyways, it's a rather moot point
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Performance
Overall no major complaints but it doesn't handle DMR (Dimensionally Modeled for Relational) very well. DMR modelling is a capability that IBM Cognos Framework Manager provides allowing you to specify dimensional information for relational metadata and allows for OLAP-style queries. However, the capability is not very efficient and, for example, if I'm using only 2 columns on a 20-column model, the software is not smart enough to exclude 18 columns and the query side gets progressively larger and larger until it's effectively unusable.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Why is their web application not working as fast as you think it should? They never know, and it is always a a bunch of shots in the dark to find out. Trying to download software from them is like trying to find a book at the library before computers were invented.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Always there on the front and backend for us and the client.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Onsite training provided by IBM Cognos was effective and as expected. They did not perform training with our data which was a bit difficult for our end-users.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The online courses they offer are thorough and presented in such a way that someone who isn't already familiar with the general design methodologies used in this field will be capable of making a good design. The training environments are provided as a fully self contained virtual machine with everything needed already to create the environments. We've had some persisting issues with the environments becoming unavailable, but support has been responsive when these issues arise and straightening them out for us
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The implementation was handled very well. The initial implementation exposed a lot of disagreement between our campuses and departments as to how we define data. This was not entirely unexpected, but I thought that we did a nice job as a team to work through some of these challenges.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM Cognos Analytics is robust in terms of reporting, governance and scheduling while Power BI excels in use, interactivity and visuals. In nutshell, IBM Cognos Analytics has edge over Power BI for enterprise grade , structured reporting needs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
Read full review
Scalability
The Cognos architecture is well suited for scalability. However, the architecture must be designed with scalability in mind from day one of the implementation. We recently upgraded from 10.1 to 10.2.1 and took the opportunity to revamp our architecture. It is now poised for future growth and scalability.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The platform can be pretty pricey.
  • Convoluted contracts and they fine you for any breach during audits.
  • Things are changed between releases without any warning and break.
  • It is second to none at being able to customize list and crosstab type reports.
  • You can easily set up a report to be emailed out every day and even have it export the report to a shared folder.
  • On-prem environments can be scaled up pretty much as much as you would like.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
  • Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Cognos Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

OpenText Magellan Screenshots

Screenshot of A Magellan BI & Reporting dashboard that an individual can interact with and personalize to their needs, such as changing chart types or computations.Screenshot of Magellan Data Discovery provides a Smart User Interface, designed to equip new users and users seeking a more streamlined set of features for insightsScreenshot of Magellan Data Discovery provides an Advanced User Interface that allows data analytics pros to leverage its breadth of sophisticated capabilities for insightsScreenshot of Magellan Text Mining insights can be displayed within easy-to-use dashboards.Screenshot of Data scientists can create visualizations within the Magellan Notebook and see it dynamically update as they write changes to it.