IBM DevOps Code ClearCase vs. Microsoft Intune vs. Microsoft System Center Service Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM DevOps Code ClearCase
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
An enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets.N/A
Microsoft Intune
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Intune (formerly Microsoft Endpoint Manager), combining the capabilities of the former Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager, SCCM or ConfigMgr, is presented as a unified endpoint management option. Microsoft Intune is an endpoint management solution for mobile devices, an MDM solution that allows the user to securely manage iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS devices with a single endpoint management solution. The component Endpoint Configuration Manager (the…
$5
per user/per month
Microsoft System Center Service Manager
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft System Center Service Manager is an integrated platform that is designed for automating and adapting IT Service Management best practices to an organization’s requirements. The platform includes built-in processes for incident and problem resolution, change control and asset lifecycle management.N/A
Pricing
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseMicrosoft IntuneMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$5
per user/per month
Microsoft 365 For Individuals
$6.99
per month
Microsoft 365 Apps
$8.25
per user/per month
Microsoft 365 For Families
$9.99
per month
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$12.50
per user/per month
Microsoft 365 Business Premium
$15
per user/per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseMicrosoft IntuneMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseMicrosoft IntuneMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Considered Multiple Products
IBM DevOps Code ClearCase

No answer on this topic

Microsoft Intune

No answer on this topic

Microsoft System Center Service Manager
Chose Microsoft System Center Service Manager
Not easy to customize, like ServiceNow, but default configuration works much more stably than SNow implementations I saw. Cannot be implemented as a service and requires underlying infrastructure. JIRA is much more lightweight, but very limited in functionality. At the same …
Features
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseMicrosoft IntuneMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
IBM DevOps Code ClearCase
-
Ratings
Microsoft Intune
-
Ratings
Microsoft System Center Service Manager
9.7
8 Ratings
16% above category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets00 Ratings00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Expert directory00 Ratings00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Service restoration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Self-service tools00 Ratings00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications00 Ratings00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation00 Ratings00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards00 Ratings00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
IBM DevOps Code ClearCase
-
Ratings
Microsoft Intune
-
Ratings
Microsoft System Center Service Manager
9.7
8 Ratings
16% above category average
Configuration mangement00 Ratings00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Asset management dashboard00 Ratings00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement00 Ratings00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
IBM DevOps Code ClearCase
-
Ratings
Microsoft Intune
-
Ratings
Microsoft System Center Service Manager
9.7
7 Ratings
12% above category average
Change requests repository00 Ratings00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Change calendar00 Ratings00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Service-level management00 Ratings00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseMicrosoft IntuneMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Small Businesses
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.4 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.2 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.4 out of 10
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseMicrosoft IntuneMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
3.3
(2 ratings)
9.2
(52 ratings)
8.8
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(12 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(14 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(10 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(14 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseMicrosoft IntuneMicrosoft System Center Service Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM Rational ClearCase might be better suited for a smaller / simpler code base. Larger code bases really slow it down... but then again there are better alternatives out there for source control
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Intune is well suited for the larger end of the small business segment to the enterprise. The ability to configure and remotely deploy computer configurations, control mobile devices, and fine tune security controls of each device or device group is a major win for this product. Smaller and mid-sized businesses may balk at having to increase their license level to unlock the better updating features.
Read full review
Microsoft
We use Microsoft System Center Service Manager in the education sector. We believe this is the only real way to manage our IT systems and ensure compliance for not only today but tomorrow as well (what ever that brings!) Our IT management team significantly streamlined our working practices to mold a slick IT support service which serves our end users efficiently. Microsoft System Center Service Manager brought added automation and clarity for all major stakeholders in our organization through detailed reporting and scheduling, ensuring a complete realtime picture of the IT estate.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Rational ClearCase is excellent for handling versioning and branching. No other tool I've used has the depth that ClearCase has when it comes to handling complex branching scenarios and identifying where certain versions of particular files are within a particular configuration.
  • Rational ClearCase handles parallel development of many dependent applications really well.
  • The use of ClearCase Views to switch between projects and configurations is extremely convenient as opposed to the local workstation model of the competitors.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • [Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Microsoft Intune + SCCM)] helps to speed up the deployment of patches/software throughout our environment. I can easily build a package and then deploy across all endpoints.
  • The ability to supercede software is also quite handy. This automates the removal of old versions and replacing them with newer versions.
  • The Intune Autopilot option is very useful if you want to deploy software to devices straight out of the box. You can configure them to download software when a user opens a new PC and turns it on for the first time.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • This tool is used to track support requests among our IT staff.
  • We use this tool to automate some more routine tasks.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Extremely buggy.
  • Sometimes the repository gets locked for no reason.
  • Slow.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Deploying more apps besides Microsoft Edge and Microsoft Office 365 app
  • Microsoft needs to make it easier to deploy exe, pkg, and msi apps without having to go through the manual process of re-packaging these apps using tools from github like intuneapputil
  • Add a feature to push out software updates for 3rd party apps
Read full review
Microsoft
  • The software requires a lot of memory to run smoothly, otherwise it will be slow.
  • It takes some time to learn, and training prices are a bit high.
  • The price is a bit high; System Center is not a cheap solution.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Mascom Wireless is a Microsoft shop and SCCM has proved to be helpful in keeping our Microsoft products up to date every month without fail. We also have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement which we renewed for three years ending 2022. The remote access utility works wonders for the organisation and have saved travel bills including subsistance allowance. We have been able to fulfill security audits both internal and external. We have been able to keep a robust inventory of our computer assets and nothing falls of the cracks
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The console is not intuitive and does not work well often. Due to the complexity of the product, documentation can be confusing. When properly configured, routine tasks like OS deployment, remote control, and software deployment are easy to do. Troubleshooting of System Center Configuration Manager issues is hard, as there are various logs, and their content can be hard to understand.
Read full review
Microsoft
As with all software, Microsoft System Center Service Manager has its quirks but it has more than made up for them with the sheer amount of functions the system brings to the table. Being based on the ITIL framework really shows with its design/terminology and, generally, we have found it 'just clicks' with our ITIL trained staff which makes operating our system straightforward and enables us to report to end users and all stakeholders consistently with ease.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
It's a 'heavy' system, which demands a lot of resources form the datacenter perspective. So, make sure you followed the requirements to avoid frustration in the future. From the 'client' perspective, it's fine. I've never had any issue with that.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
We have not needed to seek support for this product in the time that we have used it thus far. It's been working really well, and have not had any major issues. Being that it's a Microsoft product, it goes without saying that there will be many support options available if needed. This includes phone, web, forums, KB articles, etc. There is even comprehensive documentation that is available on the web through Microsoft's website for use of the product.
Read full review
Microsoft
The customer support service is excellent. They help from start/deployment through to any time later on. They responded quickly and resolved our issues professionally and in no time.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Work with a "test group" of users who you have a good relationship with so that when things don't work properly they understand! Work with your partner nicely without forcing things especially timelines as you are bound to make mistakes and create oversights in the project Management can also interfere with the implementation (which can cause delays) if you make too many mistakes which takes me back to having a "test group" where you have good relations
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
If development is centrallized to one location and your company releases hundreds of customized versions of your software per year, then ClearCase is the best tool for managing the complexity of multiple versions of customized software. If your company has globally distributed development, then I'd recommend Team Foundation Server over ClearCase. If your organization uses Agile Methodologies, then I'd recommend TFS with GIT.
Read full review
Microsoft
We did not evaluate or use other products like Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Microsoft Intune + SCCM). The main reason we did not evaluate or use other products is because Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Microsoft Intune + SCCM) integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365 and Windows PCs. Expenses would have increased as well if we had purchased another similar product.
Read full review
Microsoft
I can't really compare them as we haven't used an "all in one" tool like SCCM. There are other patch management software, other remote control applications, and to be honest, I find those work better when compared to SCCM. However, there hasn't been an application yet that does it all, so I feel it's unfair to compare. All of these tools that SCCM offers could/should be fine-tuned and made to be a bit more user-friendly.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Managed code versioning for many years.
  • Only one person can edit code at a time - slows processing down.
  • IBM is an expensive product to support.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • In our current environment, this System Center Configuration Manager had replaced several standalone solutions for patching, imaging, remote assistance, reporting, etc. That saved a lot of time and resulted in money to manage the IT infrastructure.
  • Once SCCM is deployed and fully configured, all agents are deployed and it is easy to automate a lot of processes and just control them from time to time to make sure that everything is working as supposed to be.
  • SCCM + Windows 10: great built-in endpoint protection solution. As a result, there is no need to buy additional software for that purpose.
  • The imaging process is better compared to WDS because you can modify deployment packages and apply patches to a newly imaged machine. This saves tons of time for new employees deployment.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • The tool has saved money in a transition from another 3rd party tool
  • It simplifies the ease of use for users. This is similar to other Microsoft tools
  • We are able to provide reports of system performance when questions arise about availability.
Read full review
ScreenShots