TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM FileNet Content Manager

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AIBM FileNet Content Manager is a cloud-native content services solution to manage, share and collaborate on content to save employees’ time and improve customer experiences. This ECM solution includes functionality for document management, business process management, case management, content analytics, imaging, records management, and information governance. The IBM FileNet Content Manager content management solution provides the foundation for IBM Cloud Pak® for Business Automation. It uses AI…N/A

    SharePoint

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's SharePoint is an Intranet solution that enables users to share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and collaborate across the organization.

    $5

    Per User Per Month

    Pricing
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Plan 1
    $5.00
    Per User Per Month
    Plan 2
    $10.00
    Per User Per Month
    Office 365 E3
    $20.00
    Per User Per Month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
    IBM FileNet Content Manager unlike other similar products, it has advanced security features like ACLs and digital signatures that help our organization protect our content from unauthorized access. It is highly scalable as it can handle large volumes of content and users. It …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
    We selected IBM FileNet Content Manager because it is metadata centric product and very easy to use and manage it. Developing the taxonomy structure is really simple and straight forward.

    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    89%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    89%
    Would buy again
    51 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    18 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    45 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    19 Answers
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    54 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    82%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    96%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    27 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    94%
    Implementation went as expected
    15 Answers
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    37 Answers
    Features
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of IBM FileNet Content Manager and Microsoft SharePoint
    Feature
    IBM FileNet Content Manager
    7.9
    22 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Microsoft SharePoint
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging8.418 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving8.620 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management8.422 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management7.320 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval8.220 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration8.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation8.719 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance7.821 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management7.917 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows6.618 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence8.115 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile support6.614 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration8.420 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Small Businesses
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    HCL Connections
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    HCL Connections
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    HCL Connections
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (22 ratings)
    8.1
    (271 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.8
    (26 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (31 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.8
    (13 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.5
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (5 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (51 ratings)
    Data Sources
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (50 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    5.2
    (16 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerSharePoint
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    Well Suited Scenarios: Regulatory Compliance: IBM FileNet Content Manager is ideal for industries with strict regulatory requirements, such as healthcare and finance. It helps organizations securely manage and retain documents, ensuring compliance with data retention policies. Enterprise Document Management: Large organizations that deal with extensive document volumes benefit from FileNet's document capture, indexing, and search capabilities. It simplifies document management across departments. Less Appropriate Scenarios: Small Businesses: For small businesses with limited document management needs, FileNet may be overly complex and expensive. Simpler, more cost-effective solutions may be a better fit.Simple Document Storage: Organizations primarily seeking basic cloud-based document storage without extensive workflow automation or compliance requirements might find FileNet's capabilities excessive for their needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It's Microsoft, so it rarely goes down or unnecessarily limits access. It works, though page load times can be long if you have lots of data. I feel like the Mac vs. PC divide has started to show up for MS products, but SharePoint works well with both.
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Detailed Audit trials for all document interactions.
    • As our organization grows, so does our data volume, IBM FileNet Content Manager seamlessly scales to accommodate this growth.
    • The search capabilities are powerful and we can quickly find information just by typing a name.
    • The version control feature ensures that every change, edit, or contribution is tracked and documented.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • We track employees' performance sheets, which are accessible to the employee, his manager, and HR, and this helps with transparency.
    • We maintain technical process documents and SOPs, which help us quickly provide relevant documents during audits.
    • We maintain incident documents change request forms in SharePoint, which helps us in tracking the changes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • IBM FileNet Content Manager's interface is complex and difficult to navigate for some users. IBM should consider improving the user interface to make it more easier and intuitive.
    • IBM FileNet Content Manager may be difficult to integrate with other applications and systems. IBM should consider improving its integration capabilities to ease connectivity with other systems.
    • The wide range of customization make it challenging for users to configure the software to find find their specific needs. IBM should simplify the customization process to make it easier for users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Windows Explorer users have some difficulty having to constantly UPLOAD / DOWNLOAD files. Specifically on the DOWNLOAD when they are used to Drag & Drop in & out of LOCAL folders via Window's explorer.
    • Microsoft SharePoint supports multiple "library" types. When implementing our "image" library the search function is done via "tags" and boolean logic. This is challenging to most end users. I'd like our users to be able to search our Microsoft SharePoint image library without having to enter KEYWORD or other BOOLEAN logic.
    • Microsoft SharePoint can also be an internal website for each department or company wide communication tool but I believe these features are geared for much larger organizations. Since we are a SMB we really aren't using these features. So maybe something more useful to SMBs would be nice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    It's integral to our business. It's already included with most of the Office 365 licensing we buy, so the cost is effectively zero. It stores our files, it is the foundation for custom applications, and Microsoft only continues to enhance its functionality and its connections to other Microsoft tools. SharePoint just keeps getting better and better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    No usability issues reported. Individual teams also have allocated areas which replace legacy shared drives on local LANs. Access to Sharepoint resources is fully integrated with corporate Active Directory with additional two-factor authentication required for administrative users. Users have access to Microsoft Services Hub which allows you to create, manage, and track support requests while staying current on Microsoft technologies with access to select self-paced learning paths
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    It's a great tool for our legacy system however the implementation, management time and lack of a niche provided by IBM makes it a difficult tool to recommend in a fast-paced market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Support for SharePoint is quite good. Microsoft provides good support. Microsoft offers
    • Quick turnaround time for issues
    • A range of support services
    • Access to a network of resources
    • Escalation of issues
    • Ongoing development and commitment to produce enhancement
    The majority of support is required for initial installation. Once complete and the system is operating we have had very few support issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    The face to face training I received was on SharePoint Administration. It was rushed as there was a lot of information to cover and the application of the labs weren't that great either. I like to be able to relate what I am learning to what I am currently doing.
    Read full review
    Online Training
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    I like to learn at my own pace and online training allows for that. Additionally, you can skip through pieces of content that you already know or are already comfortable with. Microsoft actually offers great videos on their website for basic fundamental SharePoint Training. I have used these training videos in some of my own training sessions with end users.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Planning to the last detail would be advised. SharePoint is a very large application that takes a lot of finesse to get operational
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    IBM FileNet Content Manager is a much superior product compared to anything in the market, IBM AI is really great and the ability to automate is really awesome. We also use other IBM products such as RPA and it integrates seamlessly. Compliance is really the USP of IBM FileNet Content Manager
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    The reasons for selecting MS SharePoint are: SharePoint provides ease of use and web design assistance and support SharePoint helps you schedule your content for publishing. enables users to share documents with external parties and offers a better internal structure of the content and better indexing and searching capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • It really streamline the business processes and reduced the overall approval time across the department.
    • Search for Document is really accurate and easy to search the specific documents.
    • Manage the content is easy
    • Also allow to add non documents related objects
    • API,s are well structured and documented
    • Content Navigator is simple to use
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • It comes with Office 365. It won't cost you any additional charges.
    • It will help you to streamline your communication and work as a central hub for all tasks, files[,] and events[.]
    • Setting it up will need a bit [of] planning. If you jump blindly it will become a confusing place for your team members and make them frustrated[.]
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM FileNet Content Manager Screenshots

    Screenshot of Editing in Microsoft Word - Collaboration in real time using Microsoft Office for the web.Screenshot of External file sharing - Securely share with external users.Screenshot of Annotation and redaction - Features an advanced viewer used to create annotations and apply redactions to content.