IBM Targetprocess vs. Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Targetprocess | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Targetprocess is a Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) SaaS that connects strategy, funding, and execution. It helps enterprises prioritize work, dynamically allocate resources, and continuously adapt plans. With real-time visibility and financial insights, organizations can deliver faster, clearer business outcomes. | N/A |
Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps | Score8.2 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Plastic was a version control system for facilitating branching, diffing and merging. It was acquired by Unity, and its features are part of Unity DevOps. The application is no longer available for sale. | $6.95 per user |
| IBM Targetprocess | Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | * Educational institutions receive a substantial discount on Plastic SCM licensing fees * Corporate/volume pricing is available * For more information, please contact sales at sales@codicesoftware.com | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Targetprocess | Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
92% Would buy again 49 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
98% Delivers good value for the price 40 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
94% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
90% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 35 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
86% Implementation went as expected 38 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| IBM Targetprocess | Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agile Development |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Targetprocess | Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | monday dev Score9.2 out of 10 | GitHub Score9.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Planview AgilePlace Score7.5 out of 10 | Git Score10 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Planview AgilePlace Score7.5 out of 10 | Perforce P4 Score7.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Targetprocess | Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 6.3 | - |
| Availability | 9.0 | - |
| Performance | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 7.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 | - |
| IBM Targetprocess | Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Targetprocess Screenshots | Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps Screenshots |















