IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Features
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.2
3 Ratings
55% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
18 Ratings
10% below category average
Pay calculation
7.03 Ratings
7.017 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
6.53 Ratings
7.013 Ratings
Direct deposit files
5.53 Ratings
7.016 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
7.015 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.014 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
25 Ratings
10% below category average
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
7.024 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
7.019 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
8.4
37 Ratings
3% above category average
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
7.930 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.75 Ratings
8.937 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.4
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.0
38 Ratings
26% below category average
Dashboards
8.05 Ratings
4.126 Ratings
Standard reports
8.05 Ratings
7.036 Ratings
Custom reports
9.35 Ratings
7.036 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
45 Ratings
17% below category average
Accounts payable
9.35 Ratings
7.942 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.35 Ratings
8.033 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
6.07 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.04 Ratings
7.018 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.74 Ratings
6.023 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.74 Ratings
8.015 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
7.016 Ratings
Cash management
00 Ratings
7.933 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
00 Ratings
7.038 Ratings
Expense management
00 Ratings
5.128 Ratings
Time tracking
00 Ratings
7.013 Ratings
Fixed asset management
00 Ratings
6.026 Ratings
Multi-currency support
00 Ratings
4.218 Ratings
Multi-division support
00 Ratings
7.025 Ratings
Regulations compliance
00 Ratings
4.112 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
00 Ratings
7.011 Ratings
Self-service portal
00 Ratings
7.012 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
00 Ratings
5.017 Ratings
Localizations
00 Ratings
8.011 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
00 Ratings
4.115 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
00 Ratings
6.013 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
5 Ratings
11% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.8
25 Ratings
4% above category average
Inventory tracking
9.05 Ratings
8.923 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.35 Ratings
6.012 Ratings
Location management
9.35 Ratings
8.017 Ratings
Manufacturing module
00 Ratings
8.914 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.0
5 Ratings
28% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.5
23 Ratings
32% below category average
Pricing
8.75 Ratings
3.117 Ratings
Order entry
8.35 Ratings
3.120 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.04 Ratings
7.011 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.75 Ratings
7.023 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.34 Ratings
7.08 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
00 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Order exception Resolution
00 Ratings
4.16 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.7
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Billing Management
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
66% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.5
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
4 Ratings
69% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.6
4 Ratings
12% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A large company where users have one function- for instance, where someone only receives or works in payables. That minimizes the number of windows they need. A smaller company where one user does multiple functions will require a lot more training and user knowledge to navigate, and it makes it harder to secure users. You also have to understand that GP started life as Great Plains, designed for accountants. The other modules were added on after Microsoft bought Great Plains, which means that modules like Manufacturing are red-headed step children with much smaller support ecosystems. So, if you're starting fresh, you may want to look at something built for the mobile world. D365 and Business Central are a lot more money, buggy, and hard to customize and essentially still vaporware. Microsoft is heavily investing there, leading to the previously mentioned question about the future of GP. If I was starting today I would be hard pressed to justify jumping into GP in a world where Salesforce ties in with so many programs. GP has MRP but it is limited so it's hard to justify a manufacturer starting with GP today.
Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!