Fin by Intercom vs. Pure Chat by Ruby

Fin by Intercom is suited for all customer support scenarios. The major part is responsible of the business to feed a well equipped KB covering all the product/platform features, process steps and FAQs. If the KB is well equipped Fin can easily address incoming customer queries which it is able to do in our case and help us touch deflection rate of 85%.

Incentivized

Chat is nothing new but the ease of use and functionality is key, that being said Pure Chat nails it across the board. We use the chat across our website and ad pages. Don't see a situation where this effective tool would be less appropriate, consumers want instant information and instant connection, chat provides both without being tied up on the phone

Incentivized

• The ability to control who and where Fin engages through Workflows.
• It can be a one-size-fits-all for your volume, or you can control the audience/topics that Fin will be active in.
• Pricing is negotiable, and while you contract to a minimum, there aren't severe penalties for overages.

Incentivized

• Online chat
• Multiple websites, multiple users
• Supervisor feature

Incentivized

• Simplified answers for different products/tiers. It handles this but not easily
• Ability to ask Copilot questions without being in a conversation
• Provide users with a more obvious prompt to watch a help video if there's a help resource that directly answers their question

Incentivized

• Transcripts that could generate in a PDF or Word doc rather than .txt file, option would be nice
• Chat is straight forward so not much room for improvement, we're happy with the service, functionality, and ease of use.

Incentivized

We have been and will be continuing our journey with Intercom and nothing too concerning has happened that I have experienced or heard of that has us on the edge yet. If it ever happens it will be something along the lines of "Outgrowing" the use of need of the platform.

Incentivized

FIN is extremely capable and the UI is very intuitive. There are some things that involve using Data Connectors - for example there's a FIN workflow for when a customer creates a ticket but it doesn't give you access to the Ticket ID. You have to create a data connector to fetch that data - just seems a little convoluted.

Incentivized

always there

Incentivized

works perfect

Incentivized

Intercom is the premier customer support/engagement model and it definitely has one of the top tier customer support teams as well. I don't think I have ever waited more than 5 minutes to get the information I need or get help with an issue. They are incredible and I aim to model our customer service department after them.

Incentivized

Easy to know the learning path

Incentivized

The implementation was surprisingly easy but we are having to adapt from our old process to work well with Intercom.

Incentivized

In my experience, what Intercom has done with Fin by Intercom is far more innovative and forward thinking than other tools I've used. It's intuitive, easy, and they are always releasing new things to make Fin by Intercom even more powerful.

Incentivized

Didn't see much pros and cons comparing Pure Chat and Olark. They all do the job. However, Pure Chat is free to use on basic functions.

Incentivized

• I like how I don't feel like I need to constantly be monitoring support, especially on weekends
• It's great that the user will get some response right away, I just need to hope that the response they do get is good enough if I'm awk

Incentivized

• Instant connection with our clients and prospects
• Expanded our ability to increase client contact efficiency
• Allows us to stay up to date with the ever changing demand of consumers

Incentivized