| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 InVision | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | InVision is a collaborative design and prototyping platform with features such as freehand drafting mode and interactive mockups, collaboration, idea management, user testing, and integration with Slack and other collaboration tools. According to the vendor, 1 million designers are using the free version. | $0 |
| InVision | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| InVision | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose InVision Figma is better for creating designs, invision is easier to use and more light weight when it comes to sharing designs Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose InVision I have only used InVision as a tool for designing mockups. I wouldn't be able to draw a fair comparison to other tools since I have more experience with InVision. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose InVision Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose InVision We only tested out using Adobe XD for similar uses and found it to be more challenging to fit within our processes. It didn't have as robust a set of capabilities as InVision and wasn't as easy to use enterprise wide. I recall also having issues with working with Sketch. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose InVision Zeplin seems to support everything that InVision does (including Inspect mode) plus reusable styles. That alone significantly speeds up development. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose InVision Zeplin also allows to share design spec and collect feedback, but the ability to have prototype changes the game.
Also, other products like Craft plugin is cherry on the cake. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose InVision Balsamiq is a better tool for interactive prototyping and dynamic transition. InVision is definitely better for handling various designs, separated by projects and shared with different access levels across multiple organizations. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose InVision Other design tools have been creating their own prototyping functionality, which has made InVision less valuable over time. It is much more convenient to use the same tool for both design and prototyping, because it removes the unnecessary steps of exporting, importing, and … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose InVision Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
79% Would buy again 15 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
85% Delivers good value for the price 11 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
84% Happy with the feature set 16 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
60% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
100% Implementation went as expected 11 Answers | |
| InVision | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  Figma Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Figma Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Figma Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| InVision | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.0 |
| Usability | 6.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.8 |
| InVision | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
| Usability |
|
| Support Rating |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots | InVision Screenshots    |
