TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Iterable

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AIterable is an AI-powered customer communication platform that activates customers across channels in real-time. With intelligent personalization, dynamic content, and a cross-channel suite, Iterable helps brands create seamless, data-driven experiences across email, SMS, push, and in-app notifications.N/A

    Metadata.io

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ABased in San Francisco, Metadata.io is a Demand Generation and ABM platform designed to execute thousands of B2B campaigns in a matter of hours, automatically optimizing campaigns for pipeline impact at a high velocity.

    $24,000

    per year

    Pricing
    IterableMetadata.io
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    MetaMatch
    $295
    per month per installation
    Web Personalization
    $24,000
    per year
    Audience Targeting
    $24,000
    per year
    Metadata Base Platform
    $60,000
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IterableMetadata.io
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptional$2,500 one-time fee per installation
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IterableMetadata.io
    Considered Both Products
    Iterable
    No answer on this topic
    Metadata, Inc
    Chose Metadata.io
    N/A
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    93%
    Would buy again
    103 Answers
    86%
    Would buy again
    18 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    80 Answers
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    16 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    102 Answers
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    19 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    91%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    67 Answers
    80%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    16 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    86%
    Implementation went as expected
    66 Answers
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    19 Answers
    Features
    IterableMetadata.io
    Email & Online Marketing
    Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Iterable and Metadata.io
    Feature
    Iterable
    8.1
    119 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Metadata.io
    -
    Ratings
    WYSIWYG email editor8.9106 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dynamic content8.7113 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ability to test dynamic content8.5111 Ratings00 Ratings
    A/B testing8.6115 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile optimization7.9110 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email deliverability reporting6.9115 Ratings00 Ratings
    List management7.1115 Ratings00 Ratings
    Triggered drip sequences8.1102 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Iterable and Metadata.io
    Feature
    Iterable
    5.7
    116 Ratings
    27% below category average
    Metadata.io
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards6.2116 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports5.6114 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports5.4105 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Iterable and Metadata.io
    Feature
    Iterable
    7.0
    113 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Metadata.io
    -
    Ratings
    API7.9102 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based workflow & approvals8.196 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizability7.4103 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with Microsoft Dynamics CRM4.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Third-party software integrations7.120 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IterableMetadata.io
    Small Businesses
    Vbout
    Score9.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Bloomreach
    Score9.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Bloomreach
    Score9.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IterableMetadata.io
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.6
    (120 ratings)
    7.8
    (21 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (15 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.3
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IterableMetadata.io
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Iterable
    - Scalability: as I mentioned, Stayforlong serves more than 3 Million travellers in 40 markets and 32 languages. We managed to build a robust CRM strategy with only 2 members on the CRM team, which helped us expand the channels with a really small, lean team. - Real-time relevance: for us, having the latest available offer is a must; we need to offer the rooms that are available in real time, because the inventory is live.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Metadata, Inc
    Metadata is well suited when you have a really large ad budget (>50k per month at least). This is because the power of metadata lies in the ability to quickly set up and run a large number of experiments (combinations of channel, audience, creative, and conversion assets). To evaluate these variations, all of them need a large number of impressions, clicks, and conversions to be statistically relevant. If your budget is smaller, you will either have a very small number of experiments (not fully utilizing the power of metadata), or your experiments will not have enough clicks to make informed decisions. We had expected a better explanation of this from metadata before signing up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Iterable
    • Customer Journey creation - the platform easily creates a visual path for the marketing team to curate messaging based around timing, channel, behavior as well as add split testing logic and exit criteria so we target only the audiences we want.
    • Customer Success - one of the best teams I've ever had the pleasure of working with. I'm able to move so much quicker because they really create a helpful partnership.
    • Audience segmentation, the platform is easy to work with even if you're a first time user, they do a great job of visually showing the logic and the and/or/none type rules.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Metadata, Inc
    • Best paid ops tool I've ever used (and I've used a lot): we can launch a new LinkedIn & Facebook campaign in minutes.
    • Lead gen ops: no more dealing with broken zapier zaps, we are able to automate pushing native lead gen leads directly to our CRM.
    • Attribution: see influenced & triggered opportunities/CW deals
    • Multivariate testing: Metadata scales audience, ad, creative testing so you learn what performs much faster than manual process
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Iterable
    • In-app channel, although it works, has some shortcomings in UI functionality or system backend logic, which suggests it is built on an email send-out architecture.
    • Drag and drop editor has its own limitations - it isn't perfect. You can't create some basic designs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Metadata, Inc
    • If you don't have a large budget and audience it's hard to meaningfully optimize. If I have 4 ad creatives, to 2 audience groups on FB and LinkedIn, that creates 16 experiments, each of which needs an ample enough budget, say $40/day, that's now $640 per day or $19K per month.
    • Limited ability to edit ads after they've been launched. You usually have to stop the ad, clone it, and launch a new campaign.
    • Can't add new ads to existing campaigns which limits the ability to optimize. If I start an MD campaign with 4 ads, and in a few weeks we see that one is working well and the other 2 are not performing, I can pause those (or it can autopause by rules), but I can't add 2 more new creatives to the mix against the high performer. I'd have to either stop the high performer, and recreate it in a new campaign (losing likes and comments), OR - leave the high performer in the first campaign, and create. a second campaign with the new ones, which will only optimize against each other.
    • Limited to a single conversion event on a landing page. I'm not able to choose either a Demo Request OR a Sign-Up conversion, I can only choose one.
    • Google search ads are doable but aren't necessarily more feature-rich or easy-to use than native, so there's no value added to doing it through Metadata in my opinion aside from unifying ad reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Iterable
    Its a robust platform that can serve complex business needs. Current and futures. It tries to adapt an newest trends and has good CS and CSM specialists.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Metadata, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Iterable
    Iterable very easy to learn and use. It's a great platform for both a new email marketer and a marketer that's been working in email for 20+ years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Metadata, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Iterable
    Iterable is there like 99.9% of the time. However, when it goes down, it grinds us to a halt. Most of the time, outages are an hour or less, but if that's at a peak time, it can be a nightmare. That said, when the worst does happen, there are frequent updates and an easy situation tracker that give you an estimate of how much longer you'll have to wait for the issue to be resolved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Metadata, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Iterable
    The API is super quick. The UI can be a little sluggish depending on what you're loading, but overall Iterable performs great. Iterable appears to do a good job of making processes async so that one action isn't blocking another.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Metadata, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Iterable
    I've never experienced any issues with Iterable. As I and my colleagues have learnt the system and it's features, response to questions and advice from our account manager is always quick. Kevin knows the product well, and with the few tricky questions has hasn't been able to answer he's been quick to get back to us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Metadata, Inc
    Metadata's customer support is a difference-maker! They really do care how well your campaigns perform and will help you improve them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Iterable
    My understanding is that Mailchimp has evolved a lot since we moved to Iterable 4 years ago, so any comparison is legacy. Keeping that in mind, Iterable is far more sophisticated, especially the journey builder, personalised STO by user and segmentation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Metadata, Inc
    We chose [Metadata.io] because it was a smaller company and could get more personalized attention. The price was better and they seemed more eager to support us. The feature set was what we were looking for and not more - it was exactly as robust as we needed it to be. Didn't want to pay for features we weren't going to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Iterable
    We've definitely tested scalability, and it's no line - it works. The process is pretty easy. Most of the times it goes off without a hitch. Any time we do encounter issues, our support team is quick to get on the job and very communicative as they work us through a successful launch.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Metadata, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Iterable
    • I do not have hard numbers, as I am not in the department that deals with those kinds of quantifications of impact. However, I do believe the use of Iterable has been a positive thing for us in providing more comprehensive data that is useful when dealing with customer tickets.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Metadata, Inc
    • Huge decrease in CPLs, CPMQL and Cost Per Opportunity
    • Big improvement in MQL to SQL rates
    • 90%+ of our leads from paid social now have valid business emails, before it was like 30%
    • Saving us hundreds of hours over the course of the next year doing daily manual optimization and budget management tasks for us so we can focus on strategy and testing new things
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Metadata.io Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot