JangoMail is an email marketing platform. Companies use JangoMail to send marketing emails, transactional emails, and person-to-person emails. JangoMail offers a feature-rich application, 24/7 support, inbox delivery, integration with most CRM's, reporting and a low price guarantee.
$25
per month
ReachMail
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
ReachMail focuses on assisting email marketers in achieving delivery success, and present their services a a guide in the ever-changing world of marketing and transactional email. ReachMail includes tools like optimized time-of-day sending, integrated list hygiene and expert support.
$9
per month
Pricing
JangoMail
ReachMail
Editions & Modules
Spark
$90.00
per month
Pro
$120.00
per month
Basic
$9.00
per month
Prro
$29.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JangoMail
ReachMail
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JangoMail
ReachMail
Features
JangoMail
ReachMail
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
JangoMail
7.6
3 Ratings
4% below category average
ReachMail
9.2
9 Ratings
15% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor
8.02 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Dynamic content
7.52 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
7.02 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Landing pages
7.52 Ratings
5.04 Ratings
A/B testing
7.52 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Mobile optimization
7.52 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
8.53 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
List management
8.03 Ratings
10.09 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
7.52 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
JangoMail
7.5
3 Ratings
1% below category average
ReachMail
9.7
9 Ratings
24% above category average
Dashboards
7.53 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Standard reports
7.53 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
Custom reports
7.52 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Pre-Send Testing
Comparison of Pre-Send Testing features of Product A and Product B
JangoMail is only good for sending mass email and nothing more. While its interface is simple to use, it doesn't have a good amount of features attached to it. That probably explains why it's quite cheap compared to other mailing services. It's lacking features and additional functionalities. It's a cheap alternative mainly for sending mass email though, which is nice for a company that sells product to consumers like us.
The free Reachmail account (which I have used for several small organizations) is a good tool where there are limited or zero email marketing dollars, a contact audience of up to 5,000 subscribers, and a max of 15,000 monthly emails. The pricing levels are really reasonable for volume requirements, including custom plans for infrequent mailings. If there are constraints (time and/or design experience) that require a large choice of ready-made contemporary templates without graphic or font modifications, then this probably isn't a good email marketing tool.
I have a $10 account, but customer support treat me like a princess. They even added a feature to one page to remedy a problem I was having with that page. They care about their customers.
ReachMail Features (or at least, these are the ones I know they have): WYSIWYG Email Editor, Template Management, Mobile Optimized Emails, Dynamic Content, Subscribe/Unsubscribe, Mailing List Management, Drip Campaigns, Auto-Responders, Image Library, A/B Testing, Customer Surveys, CAN SPAM Compliance, Reporting/Analytics.
These folks know what they’re doing. I can’t speak highly enough about ReachMail.
So far I haven't had any troubles, or problems with JangoMail. I'd love to just paste a WORD doc into the HTML window, but I am not going to risk having the links broken. So I preformat my copy with the long links and then insert them in the HTML window and make them look pretty.
JangoMail's "add additional fields" in the into the body of the email is not very transparent, but when you add additional features and that depth of functionally then there is going to be a higher learning curve. I have not explored all of their tutorials.....and they have a great blog to explore also.
This is not a big thing but maybe a clock could be installed to show that the email is being sent and that there is x amount of time until the "report" is ready to view. There is a no man's land time that as a user you are not sure if the mail got delivered or is being delivered.
There are no batch report downloads. When I have multiple variations and waves in a campaign, I have to download reports individually. I'd like for a way to download one report of all sends during a certain time period, or given another set of parameters.
It would save a lot of time if we had the ability to upload multiple images or assets at once.
There's only a two-level "tree" of organization of lists and suppression lists. It would be great if we had the abililty to nest lists into better categories, rather than having to scroll through one giant list of suppressions or deployment lists. Something like a 2015 folder, then inside that a Business Unit folder, then inside that, a Campaign folder, etc. This would make things much easier to find.
I selected JangoMail because I wanted to try something new. Usually I find myself using YAMM which is Yet Another Mail Merge but using a new interface was refreshing and it was also very easy to learn and use. I would definitely use it again in the future and recommend to others
In my opinion, ReachMail is a good competitor to Mailchimp, probably has more features though and analytics to help organize information. There are also a lot more third party integrations that have helped us compared to other apps that we've tried before, but ReachMail has been the most useful, for me personally and my team
None. I signed up for a pay account so only had to spend a dollar for the first month. Even that was a waste as I simply can't send emails out with their forced unsubscribe header. If it was the typical CAN-SPAM footer it would be fine, but it just looks awful.