Jitterbit is a cloud integration technology for cloud, social or mobile apps. It provides accessibility for
non-technical users, including easily creating API’s and data transformation scripts within the
integrations.
$1,000
per month
Oracle Warehouse Builder
Score8.7 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Warehouse Builder (OWB) is a data-warehousing centered data integration solution, from Oracle. It offers basic ETL functionality for building a simple data warehouse, as well as advanced ETL functionality supporting enterprise data integration projects, along with connectivity for Oracle and SAP applications.
N/A
Pricing
Jitterbit
Oracle Warehouse Builder
Editions & Modules
Jitterbit
$100.00
Starting Price Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jitterbit
Oracle Warehouse Builder
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Jitterbit
Oracle Warehouse Builder
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Jitterbit and Oracle Warehouse Builder
Feature
Jitterbit
7.2
12 Ratings
11% below category average
Oracle Warehouse Builder
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors
8.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Connector modification
7.211 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration
7.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality services
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data security features
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Monitoring console
6.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Jitterbit and Oracle Warehouse Builder
Feature
Jitterbit
-
Ratings
Oracle Warehouse Builder
9.5
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Jitterbit and Oracle Warehouse Builder
Feature
Jitterbit
-
Ratings
Oracle Warehouse Builder
10.0
5 Ratings
21% above category average
Simple transformations
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Complex transformations
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Jitterbit and Oracle Warehouse Builder
Feature
Jitterbit
-
Ratings
Oracle Warehouse Builder
8.2
5 Ratings
3% above category average
Data model creation
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Metadata management
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Business rules and workflow
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Collaboration
00 Ratings
8.94 Ratings
Testing and debugging
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Jitterbit and Oracle Warehouse Builder
This is a great tool for bringing data out of your locked, internal systems and getting it into the cloud. It meshes well with Salesforce and is fairly easy to use, helping the transition from other older, more complex tools into a more modern environment. It has lots of competition in this space and some are better than others, but if your data is straight forward and you know it well, Jitterbit will get the job done. If you are not as close or comfortable with your data and need to do some wildly complex migrations, there might be better packages out there for you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The best place for Oracle Warehouse Builder is at the business IT level. It's not suited for business-level users. They are easy confused. One way to reduce the confusion for the developers is to set up the workspaces based on the requirements that are discovered in design sessions. Once this is complete, the implementation of Oracle Warehouse Builder can take flight and be successful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Migrating operations from QA to Production work well for initial deployment, however, when migrating an update to an existing job to production, sometimes certain project items are duplicated. This is not the end of the world... the duplicates can be removed, but would be nice if it was not required.
I have not found a way to trap under-the-covers SOAP errors (for example, when a query you are running against Salesforce takes too long). You get a warning error in the operation log that the job only pulled a "partial" file, but it does not fail.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
What I noticed is that sometimes OWB doesn't generate the best SQL in the package especially when there are a high number of source tables in the ETL. It would be nice if ETL developers were allowed to update the generated packages in the database directly.
Another thing - moving OWB ETLs from one database to another one could be easier - for example it would be nice to just copy the generated packages from one database to the other one without doing the deployment of these ETLs through OWB.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have been evaluating other tools as a continuous improvement practice. I would like something that would be easier to use for a non-technical user. I work for a small organization and have no back-up for Jitterbit if something happens to me. We don't have the technically savvy employees to understand it.
Evaluated Dell Boomi and Celigo as alternatives prior to purchasing Jitterbit. We went with Jitterbit at that time because we could handle all changes ourselves without any assistance from Jitterbit, and we liked their size and nimbleness. Dell Boomi was too big for us, and Celigo at that time did not have a self-service model. Every change had to go through them (although that has since changed). We were not in a position to be able to wait for someone to make changes for us given the rate of change within the business.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The time it takes to connect systems has reduced by orders of magnitude. Previously, we would custom-develop connectors between various systems and they would all be managed by different vendors. With Jitterbit speed-to-deploy and the efficiency gained by managing all connections in one dashboard has been the greatest piece of the ROI.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info