Progress Kendo UI vs. React (React.js)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Progress Kendo UI
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Kendo UI is a JavaScript UI toolkit that allows users to build responsive web-based apps integrated into their framework of choice (jQuery, Angular, React, or Vue). The vendor’s value proposition is that Kendo UI offers a large library of popular and configurable components ranging from sophisticated grids and charts to basic buttons, so users don’t have to waste development time building their UI. The vendor also says the large library of customizable themes means users can easily deploy a…
$999
per developer, royalty-free
React (React.js)
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
React or React.js is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces. React enables users to create interactive UIs.N/A
Pricing
Progress Kendo UIReact (React.js)
Editions & Modules
Kendo UI with Priority Support
$999
per developer, royalty-free
DevCraft UI
$1,299
per developer, royalty-free
DevCraft Complete
$1,499
per developer, royalty-free
DevCraft Ultimate
$2,199
per developer, royalty-free
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Progress Kendo UIReact (React.js)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Progress Kendo UIReact (React.js)
Considered Both Products
Progress Kendo UI
Chose Progress Kendo UI
I did not experience the other product that has such an integrated and user-friendly feature. It works more like an everyday query with the UI element in a totally aesthetic and attractive view. With the Kendo library, we don't need to develop every UI component from the …
Chose Progress Kendo UI
It is one of the most suited product across the organization.
Chose Progress Kendo UI
We currently use data tables in most of our applications that require a grid to be able to asynchronously perform CRUD operations on our web applications. It has served us well but Kendo UI has more widgets and better documentation to get the job done. Given the time, we would …
Chose Progress Kendo UI
We wanted to use software which is easy to learn and implement for UI. we did some research and used few controls and we found that we can go with kendo UI. Look and feel wise Kendo fits perfectly. so we decided to use it through out the product. it is good software in …
Chose Progress Kendo UI
At the time of initial purchase, Kendo UI provided a more robust set of UI tools than other vendors.
Chose Progress Kendo UI
The Kendo UI controls are more professional in appearance, better documented and simpler to integrate into our software applications. It takes us less time to implement the Kendo UI controls in our projects than comparable offerings from other vendors or open-source …
Chose Progress Kendo UI
We considered Dev Express but ultimately chose Kendo based on familiarity another member of our dev staff had with the Progress UI.
Chose Progress Kendo UI
We honestly didn't look at very many others, we asked other people who work on similar tasks in the area and made our selection based off of their recommendations of Telerik and our experience using the open-source components for a trial. When Telerik/Kendo got the job done …
Chose Progress Kendo UI
When we purchased Kendo UI, it was Telerik, and it was much further ahead at that time than Syncfusion was. This is the main reason we opted for Kendo. The controls also looked much more polished that Syncfusion's controls did at that time--and they still do, in the current …
Chose Progress Kendo UI
Kendo UI is superior to Infragistics Ignite UI.
Kendo UI elements are more reliable and compatible.
Kendo UI provide more features and is easier to implement
Chose Progress Kendo UI
The use of Telerik tools was mandated as a standard by our client, so no evaluation was conducted. That said, were are happy with their selection.
Chose Progress Kendo UI
The customization in Kendo UI is unbeatable, and we haven't found anything that can really compare to this aspect.
Chose Progress Kendo UI
Other products were not evaluated because Kendo UI was established as a solid option and we already leveraged UI for Ajax and UI for Winforms controls. I have experience with dojo/dijit, YUI, and jQuery controls but all are substantially more primitive that Kendo and related …
Chose Progress Kendo UI
Kendo UI and the Telerik suite covered more of the technologies and platforms that we were working in (i.e. WinForms, MVC).
Chose Progress Kendo UI
Kendo is easy to set up and upgrade. It is easy to use for developers and we can make attractive UI, so it automatically increases business.
Kendo UI provides more control on UI fields as it has various properties associated with it. We can use the mask property for accepting …
Chose Progress Kendo UI
Kendo is more configurable. It has a great support base and community. It's well suited to integrate with ASP.NET MVC. It's well suited to integrate with AngularJS. You can create generic and dynamic controls which are configurable. With grids it provides higher …
React (React.js)
Chose React (React.js)
This was very difficult because flutter is extremely easy to use and if you have React in the background, it makes it even easier. What makes Flutter a little better is the response, the components are rendered before the loading and that gives the user a better experience. The …
Chose React (React.js)
I have also used Angular before coming to React. Web apps created with React are much faster than Angular because React is based on virtual DOM which reloads only those components of the web page that change and everything else remains the same. Angular's learning curve is also …
Chose React (React.js)
It uses JSX so no need to create a separate javascript function to build the application which saves development time.
Chose React (React.js)
I have also used Vue, Angular, and Ember for various projects. Out of the three, I am most intrigued by Vue. It takes a more beginner-friendly approach than React and changes some of the abstractions it uses to be more transparent to the user. It also comes with a lot more …
Chose React (React.js)
There are other options for building SPAs, and the two most common aside from React are Vue and Angular. React has been the leader of the pack for a while and has been an innovator. Angular is good for companies that want an opinionated framework so that it standardizes …
Chose React (React.js)
Like most people, I started in serious client-side web development with the introduction of jQuery, the first robust library for cross-browser DOM manipulation. React provides a much closer WYSIWYG translation from the declarative JSX template to HTML elements compared to using …
Chose React (React.js)
I have not used or evaluated virtual DOM alternatives to React.
Chose React (React.js)
While this is a widely contested debate with various blog posts and benchmarks all over the place, its really a personal choice to determine what works for the team. Coming from a Angular 1.x background, I decided to try a new framework when Angular 2.x was announced and at …
Chose React (React.js)
When choosing a front-end framework, you have a ton of choices. There are numerous articles that will try to convince you this way or that about which one is better. I have used Blaze as a UI layer for Meteor Application development quite extensively and have found it to …
Best Alternatives
Progress Kendo UIReact (React.js)
Small Businesses
Syncfusion Essential Studio
Syncfusion Essential Studio
Score 7.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Sencha
Sencha
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Progress Kendo UIReact (React.js)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Progress Kendo UIReact (React.js)
Likelihood to Recommend
Kendo UI works well if developing web UI applications which have simple layout designs. - Good A scenario where there are a lot of Kendo widgets on a single UI page, and each has a complex initialization. - Not so good
Read full review
React is a JavaScript user interface construction library that works well for:
  • Developing web apps with dynamic and complicated user interfaces.
  • creating reusable UI elements that may be used in other applications.
  • creating single-page applications with dynamic content updates that don't require a page reload.
  • The Virtual DOM's effective updating mechanism allows it to handle large volumes of data updates.
React, on the other hand, might be less suitable for:
  • Websites that are simple, stagnant, and have no interaction. Other libraries or simple HTML, CSS, and JavaScript may be a better fit in such circumstances.
  • Web sockets may be a better choice for applications that need real-time updates, such as chat or gaming apps.
  • When creating mobile apps, React Native is a better option.
  • Server side rendering only, as React is designed to run on the client side.
Read full review
Pros
  • Kendo Grid for presenting a timeline of research grants as they are being approved. Our users love the ability to export the data to various mime formats.
  • Kendo Scheduler for presenting the upcoming calendar events in the available conference rooms in a building. This is used together with a 3rd party vendor API for appointment booking.
  • Kendo Treeview is used to present a hierarchy of topics that our users can navigate through easily.
Read full review
  • Solid backing by large organization (Facebook) thats committed to keeping the development on the project. In my mind, this is the number one priority for any library because without this: time is wasted on getting up-to speed on a library that you will never use, have a codebase with a library thats hard to maintain because few years down the lane, hiring devs to maintain an unsupported library is very difficult.
  • As with any libraries, open source community's support is critical for success of any framework because this allows for more pre-built components that could be used right out-of-box => makes Development using React a breeze.
  • React's Stateful and Stateless components make organizing your code a breeze. These components would also allow for writing clean Unit Tests on the logic.
  • React's component lifecycle. It offers a variety of lifecycle methods, that allows for handling different scenarios of loading and manipulating data in the UI.
  • I found React's documentation very well maintained with plenty of examples explaining each feature.
  • Responsiveness is a very important criteria in selecting a UI and React is very responsive. It does some neat optimizations on re-rendering using virtual DOM and would only re-render parts of the DOM that changed. These optimizations makes React Applications feel really fast.
  • React Native would allow for building applications that span across web and mobile interfaces (iOS and Android). This makes learning React even more enticing, because using a single library, you could build applications that span across Web, iOS and Android.
  • create-react-app is an effort by Facebook (creators of React) that makes getting started with React really easy. It does all the heavy lifting of configurations for you and allow you to focus on just development.
  • Small footprint, minified React + React DOM is under 150Kb, that makes loading UI's with react really fast.
  • React + Enzyme (backed by Airbnb) + Sinon + Mocha + Chai makes unit testing the UI components fun and improves the overall maintainability of the project.
Read full review
Cons
  • Kendo UI is always moving forward and staying current with latest development trends. While that is beneficial, that can cause some issues when supporting customers (particularly government) that don't move their IT infrastructure along nearly as fast. A prime example is web font icons. Great and easy to use, but where Kendo UI utilizes web font icons as the sole means of displaying an icon, not all organizations (again, especially government) allow the use of these. There have been times where Kendo UI became unusable and we had to downgrade to a version a few years old. Makes continued payment for licenses sometimes feel wasted as we may not be able to always use the new releases
  • Kendo UI has a wonderful feedback system and they do indeed listen to the community. However, there do seem to be some instances where there is large support for a new feature/component and it never gets addressed. It is easy to understand that not all ideas are easy or even prudent to implement, but would be nice to see a better follow-up on ideas with a current status
  • Refreshing Kendo UI grids is simple, yet the standard API method causes the grid to return to the default state. We have many use cases where we would love to update the grid data but need current grid state (such as expanded detail rows, sorts, filters, etc) preserved after the grid is updated so that users do not have to perform grid actions again to return to the desired state.
Read full review
  • React's state management can get hairy if you have a deeply nested component and need to pass things up or down the tree very far. This is where libraries like Redux come in, however.
  • The progressive nature of its development and change cycles can leave information outdated online faster than other frameworks. This can make finding help or documentation on 3rd party sites frustrating.
  • The learning curve on "thinking in React" can be slightly higher than other more familiar patterns of web development.
  • Building an app in it can be cumbersome to set up with webpack, but things like Create React App can get you going in a jiffy.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Since we are using Kendo on a legacy product, there is likely a time when we will no longer support it. We are evaluating Kendo for our future product, in which case we may continue to use Kendo for an extended period of time.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
My initial score would be 10, but I am aware of the high price for its implementation. Therefore, I would recommend it only in large projects where a large profit margin can be obtained. But in general, I recommend it. I am currently using it without problems.
Read full review
There are a few things that may take some getting used to when coming to a modern JS frontend. Tools like Babel and Webpack (or abstractions that hide their details from you) are often a starting point and JSX can be confusing at first. But assuming the developer is already familiar with modern frontend tools, React is a very natural fit and makes creating user interfaces a joy.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
The errors that we have detected were not of great importance and the online support provided a temporary solution until the next release.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Reports sometimes take a bit of time to load
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Overall, we are satisfied with the support offered by the Progress Kendo UI team. We had raised few helpline incidents in the past and they have been resolved timely by the team. Also, we were satisfied with the level of information and support provided by the team.
Read full review
Since it's open-source and very popular, the community support for React and related tools and libraries is excellent. There are a lot of people using the same tools, and so issues tend to get fixed quickly and "recipes" are easy to come by. And since it's backed by Facebook, they have a dedicated engineering team working on the progression of React.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I think the main thing is to get into a Kendo mindset. Components that I've used in the past had a much different mindset and I think it got in my way. Sometimes I would use something different if I felt that the Kendo component was being too obstinate. I would go back later and replace that with the Kendo component when I had time to work with it further.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I did not experience the other product that has such an integrated and user-friendly feature. It works more like an everyday query with the UI element in a totally aesthetic and attractive view. With the Kendo library, we don't need to develop every UI component from the beginning. It was one of the faster development of applications.
Read full review
There are other options for building SPAs, and the two most common aside from React are Vue and Angular. React has been the leader of the pack for a while and has been an innovator. Angular is good for companies that want an opinionated framework so that it standardizes practices. However, Angular is known to be more difficult to work with and unnecessarily complex. Vue is seen as taking the best from React and Angular, and it is built for incremental upgrades. Vue has a passionate and growing user base, but it hasn't quite caught React in popularity.
Read full review
Scalability
Never faced a problem even when we threw a large amount of data at it
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Positive impact is that it helps development team to focus on business logic rather than developing UI control and that resulted in good productivity savings. productivity saving is significant (like 30% of product development cost).
  • No Negative impact from my experience.
Read full review
  • Since we're still in the conversion cycle, all the data is not in. But React has had a positive impact on Developer productivity and the ability to produce efficient, highly flexible UX. This in turn, enhances our customer experience, which is generally the most important component of our ROI.
  • Conversion has been difficult since it requires a change of mindset. Most developers have adapted quite well, but the process has been lengthy, and 2 years in, we are still not fully converted. This essentially is a temporary negative impact on ROI.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Progress Kendo UI Screenshots

Screenshot of Our extensive library provides you with the tools you need to easily control your app and display data in whatever format you need. Our advanced Sass Themebuilder lets you take any of our stock library themes and modify it to precisely match your brand requirements. Enhance your customer’s user experience with seamlessly integrated Kendo UI components.Screenshot of Easily create eye-catching and full-featured user interfaces by selecting from our rich library of components. Use advanced features like our grid component to create tables that display data in a wide range of formats from both local and remote sources.  We support popular frameworks like jQuery, Angular, React, Vue, and others so you can integrate our Kendo UI components into whatever environment you choose.Screenshot of Create rich dashboard applications by taking advantage of the breadth of UI widgets available within the Kendo UI toolset. Easily wire up the UI widgets to any existing RESTful API and backend to display any and all kind of data that you need to surface in your applications.Screenshot of Combine existing HTML elements and styling alongside with the Kendo UI components to create the exact kind of user interface that your users are requesting. The Kendo UI widgets can be dropped in to any existing application and be added widget-by-widget to ensure that adding the rich Kendo UI components can be done in a timely manner without disrupting existing app dev workflows.