lemlist is an outreach platform that helps to start conversations that get replies from prospects. Sales teams of all sizes, startups, lead gen agencies, and entrepreneurs can use lemlist to grow relationships with their customers.
$59
per month per seat
Olark
Score10 out of 10
N/A
Olark is a website live chat tool for engaging website visitors while they browse. It can be used to to track leads, drive sales, provide support.
$15
per month
Pricing
lemlist
Olark
Editions & Modules
Email outreach
$59
per month per seat
Sales engagement
$99
per month per seat
Outbound agency
Custom Quote
Self Service
$19.00
Per Agent Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
lemlist
Olark
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
lemlist
Olark
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of lemlist and Olark
Feature
lemlist
9.5
4 Ratings
22% above category average
Olark
-
Ratings
Lead nurturing automation
9.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
9.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality management
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated follow-ups
9.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead segmentation and distribution
9.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead Management Integrations
Comparison of Lead Management Integrations features of lemlist and Olark
Feature
lemlist
9.5
4 Ratings
23% above category average
Olark
-
Ratings
Integrations with advertising platforms
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with CRMs
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with data storage tools
9.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with lead automation tools
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion Rate Optimization
Comparison of Conversion Rate Optimization features of lemlist and Olark
Feature
lemlist
9.7
3 Ratings
16% above category average
Olark
-
Ratings
KPI analytics
9.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Drop-off analytics
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B tests
9.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form Building
Comparison of Form Building features of lemlist and Olark
Feature
lemlist
9.6
4 Ratings
14% above category average
Olark
-
Ratings
Drag & Drop editing
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Branding customization
9.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Different question types
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conditional logic paths
9.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Embedded calculations
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form templates
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom code
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web embedding
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile responsiveness
9.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Date picker
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
File upload
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic content
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Chat Analytics and Reports
Comparison of Chat Analytics and Reports features of lemlist and Olark
Well Suited Scenarios - 1. To generate a lead base or cliental. 2. To get the email addresses and the social media accounts of people who might be relevant for your business like Linkeln accounts of people. 3. You can directly send leads to lemlist via Linkedln Area's of improvement - 1. Having a detailed and more diverse filter to find leads. 2. I would like to use lemlist as a crm tool.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Olark chat is easy to set up and use. You can have more than one user logged in to monitor the chat on different computers. This makes a fast response time more likely. Although you have to be sure to keep your volume up on the computer so you hear the sound letting you know there's a chat waiting. I like that you can see the customers path through the website and you can put clickable links while you are in a chat to guide the customer to a product or a help page. Plus you can see if they actually went there. This makes it easier to upsell
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Olark is user friendly for both sides of the CHAT conversation. If you are initiating the chat, or the one receiving the chat, it is extremely easy to follow and use. There are many different levels of computer use comprehension and Olark is for every level.
Olark has reporting features to allow you to check the quality of your employees chat abilities as well as their productivity. It provides feedback for the employee themselves to also see how they are doing and take any suggestions the customer may leave for them regarding their chat experience.
Olark is very affordable and offers you the option, at a low cost, to look bigger and more professional that you even are. We were a smaller company and has the chat option with Olark and now have grown tremendously and STILL have the Olark chat option. Olark allowed us to grow and provide professionalism to our customers .
The Olark program allows you to set up quick responses to keep your customer from waiting, and to allow your employees to not have to retype the same response over and over. It is a great program that the employees really enjoy as well. It reminds you if you forgot to log out when you left your desk and provides your customer a quick note giving them the option to send the chat as an email inquiry instead, so you don't miss a thing.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Not really an area of improvement for Olark specifically, but I will offer that it is incredibly important to keep in mind your company's "shopping hours" or peak traffic times (there is a Reports feature on the software that allows you to analyze peak traffic times).
Transcript history can be a little tricky - if you're searching for a specific past conversation, sometimes you may get multiple search results and have to sift through them until you find exactly what you're looking for.
I'd also offer that you will occasionally come across folks that are on your site to cyberbully or say nonsensical things. While there isn't an absolute fullproof way to deal with this, Olark does offer a nice "block" feature to disregard any unwanted conversations.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
There are a lot of cold email solutions on the market, and Lemlist is one of the more expensive solutions. However, Lemlist is a strong contender due to the fact you can do mulri-channel and gather prospect data so easily and effectively
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
To be honest, renewal decisions are not currently within my power. Hypothetically speaking, I'm very comfortable with the platform, have used it daily for nearly a year, and would see no reason to switch to anything else. The small criticisms I had are not significant enough to deter me from using Olark. It's a user friendly, effective tool for our department.
I give these rating because i am a witness itself. So 10 as always this tool is perfect and i would love to use it more over the coming years and to see this upgrade more and add more features, So far now it really helps my business generating ROI and our investment, So far its our own backbone for our Email Marketing and Everything about GTM's.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Our organization does not have any complaints about Olark's Support. Anytime we reached out to them for assistance, we received a prompt, helpful reply! As mentioned previously, we used Olark fairly basically so we didn't have too much need to work with their support team other than a few general questions here and there. They were always pleasant to work with.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We switched because lemlist was something that our manager had used in the past in his last org. and he recommended us to go for a trial version to make the final decision of which services we want to use. Lemlist was equally good and was a cheaper alternative, as we are a startup the overall cost of using a service is also something we need to keep in mind.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Olark has an easier implementation process and has better functionality such as the ability to send commands through the platform to either create a ticket in your CRM or push an opportunity to salesforce; you're even able to 'push' the end user to a web page. Implementing their SDK is a snap as well.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info