Marchex harnesses AI and conversational intelligence to provide actionable insights aligned with prescriptive vertical market data analytics. Marchex enables executive, sales, and marketing teams to optimize customer journey experiences across communications channels. Through a prescriptive analytics solutions, it enables the alignment of enterprise strategy while supporting informed decision-making and strategic execution. Marchex provides conversational intelligence solutions for companies in…
N/A
Tableau Desktop
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Tableau Desktop is a data visualization product from Tableau. It connects to a variety of data sources for combining disparate data sources without coding. It provides tools for discovering patterns and insights, data calculations, forecasts, and statistical summaries and visual storytelling.
$75
per month
Yseop
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Yseop is a Natural Language Generation (NLG) software targeted at Enterprises. Yseop is based on Artificial Intelligence that reasons on data and writes intelligent content in clear natural language at the speed of thousands of pages per second and in multiple languages (English, Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, etc.). Yseop helps make sense of Big Data to draw actionable insights.
N/A
Pricing
Marchex
Tableau Desktop
Yseop
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Tableau
$75
per month per user
Tableau Enterprise
$115
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Marchex
Tableau Desktop
Yseop
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
All pricing plans are billed annually.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Marchex
Tableau Desktop
Yseop
Features
Marchex
Tableau Desktop
Yseop
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Marchex
-
Ratings
Tableau Desktop
8.4
175 Ratings
3% above category average
Yseop
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
8.0145 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
9.1174 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
8.1151 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Marchex
-
Ratings
Tableau Desktop
8.3
172 Ratings
3% above category average
Yseop
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
8.5167 Ratings
00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
8.4170 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
8.0126 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.5165 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Marchex
-
Ratings
Tableau Desktop
8.3
166 Ratings
1% above category average
Yseop
-
Ratings
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
8.0155 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
8.0154 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
8.3120 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.6128 Ratings
00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers
00 Ratings
8.778 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
The Marchex platform is suitable for you to draw conclusions on how to approach your users. It also helps you with conversational improvements and data analysis. I recommend if you already have a large user base who buy your service and are always asking for explanations to hire Marchex for sure
The best scenario is definitely to collect data from several sources and create dedicated dashboards for specific recipients. However, I miss the possibility of explaining these reports in more detail. Sometimes, we order a report, and after half a year, we don't remember the meaning of some data (I know it's our fault as an organization, but the tool could force better practices).
Yseop is an excellent option if you are looking to analyze your data in a way that's easy to understand and interpret. There will be no more hours upon hours spent on interpreting confusing data. Instead, Yseop translates this data for your teams so they can focus on other higher priority tasks and less time trying to analyze data that just doesn't make sense.
Marchex does exactly what you need it to do. It allows businesses to quickly and effectively create online and offline call-tracking numbers to measure marketing performance.
Marchex offers a variety of additional options, features, and capabilities outside of their core business model, which is call tracking. These business offerings appeal to smaller businesses, since they are primarily an enterprise-level call-tracking platform.
Marchex allows you to listen and mark phone calls based on whether or not they lead to a conversion, if you business has the time to manage this process, it is an effective way to determine which source/mediums are providing the highest inside-conversion rate.
An excellent tool for data visualization, it presents information in an appealing visual format—an exceptional platform for storing and analyzing data in any size organization.
Through interactive parameters, it enables real-time interaction with the user and is easy to learn and get support from the community.
Although customer support is only a phone call away, trouble shooting was not their strongest area. There was usually only one person who could help with technical support and getting past the gate keepers to talk to that person was not easy.
Salesmen were difficult to get in touch with. You think it would be easy to negotiate a contract to add more services but this proved to be a difficult task as well.
Online reporting could use improvement. If you wanted to sift through data you had to download a spreadsheet to manipulate the data. Very little beyond simple reporting could be accomplished on their platform.
I think the software is mid-range level usability. For someone who's worked with this kind of software before, it's easy, but if someone is new to it, it could cause challenges.
Could improve on constant advancement, especially in a world of changing technologies.
Overall, the features are exactly what we need. More advanced features would be a plus.
We renew Marchex each year, we love it! It's a great investment. It's woven into a few of our products that we offer our clients so we wouldn't stop using it any time soon. The clients are big fans of it
Our use of Tableau Desktop is still fairly low, and will continue over time. The only real concern is around cost of the licenses, and I have mentioned this to Tableau and fully expect the development of more sensible models for our industry. This will remove any impediment to expansion of our use.
Tableau Desktop has proven to be a lifesaver in many situations. Once we've completed the initial setup, it's simple to use. It has all of the features we need to quickly and efficiently synthesize our data. Tableau Desktop has advanced capabilities to improve our company's data structure and enable self-service for our employees.
When used as a stand-alone tool, Tableau Desktop has unlimited uptime, which is always nice. When used in conjunction with Tableau Server, this tool has as much uptime as your server admins are willing to give it. All in all, I've never had an issue with Tableau's availability.
Tableau Desktop's performance is solid. You can really dig into a large dataset in the form of a spreadsheet, and it exhibits similarly good performance when accessing a moderately sized Oracle database. I noticed that with Tableau Desktop 9.3, the performance using a spreadsheet started to slow around 75K rows by about 60 columns. This was easily remedied by creating an extract and pushing it to Tableau Server, where performance went to lightning fast
Tableau support has been extremely responsive and willing to help with all of our requests. They have assisted with creating advanced analysis and many different types of custom icons, data formatting, formulas, and actions embedded into graphs. Tableau offers a weekly presentation of features and assists with internal company projects.
It is admittedly hard to train a group of people with disparate levels of ability coming in, but the software is so easy to use that this is not a huge problem; anyone who can follow simple instructions can catch up pretty quickly.
I think the training was good overall, but it was maybe stating the obvious things that a tech savvy young engineer would be able to pick up themselves too. However, the example work books were good and Tableau web community has helped me with many problems
Again, training is the key and the company provides a lot of example videos that will help users discover use cases that will greatly assist their creation of original visualizations. As with any new software tool, productivity will decline for a period. In the case of Tableau, the decline period is short and the later gains are well worth it.
I have used Power BI as well, the pricing is better, and also training costs or certifications are not that high. Since there is python integration in Power BI where I can use data cleaning and visualizing libraries and also some machine learning models. I can import my python scripts and create a visualization on processed data.
Tableau Desktop's scaleability is really limited to the scale of your back-end data systems. If you want to pull down an extract and work quickly in-memory, in my application it scaled to a few tens of millions of rows using the in-memory engine. But it's really only limited by your back-end data store if you have or are willing to invest in an optimized SQL store or purpose-built query engine like Veritca or Netezza or something similar.
Tableau was acquired years ago, and has provided good value with the content created.
Ongoing maintenance costs for the platform, both to maintain desktop and server licensing has made the continuing value questionable when compared to other offerings in the marketplace.
Users have largely been satisfied with the content, but not with the overall performance. This is due to a combination of factors including the performance of the Tableau engines as well as development deficiencies.