Maze is a rapid user testing platform from Maze.design in Paris, designed to give users actionable user insights, in a matter of hours. The vendor states that with it, users can test remotely, autonomously, and collaboratively.
$75
per month 3+ seats
UXtweak
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The UX research tool UXtweak helps business users to understand what customers think and feel about a website, app, or prototype. The UXtweak platform's features include competitive usability testing, complex website testing, session recording, card sorting, tree testing, mobile testing,and prototype testing. Using these tools helps to see a website from the users' point of view and discover what matters the most to…
$0
Free
Pricing
Maze
UXtweak
Editions & Modules
Professional
$75
per month 3+ seats
Organization
custom pricing
Starter
$0
Free
Plus
$99
per month per seat
Business
$179
per month per seat
Enterprise
Customizable
Contact us
Business Plan with Pre-paid Participants
Starting at $279
per month Per seat + number of pre-paid study participants
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Maze
UXtweak
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
With annual billing you can save 20% off your purchase!
1. Ease of use - Maze's user experience is very much better than user testing.com 2. Testing Panel - Although Maze's testing panel is not as much quantity as User testing, QUality is quite good for the testers you hire 3. Analytics after testing - Maze gives detailed analytics …
We left sprig to use maze because sprig had unreliable Figma questions and integrations. We chose maze as it was partnered with Dovetail and Askable, that's how we heard about them. We're not particularly loyal or wedded to maze.
We ran a proof of concept exercise between Maze User Testing and Optimal Workshop. We found both products to be as good as each other in the elements of the products that both offered. Optimal Workshop did offer a lot more than what was required for the specific project for …
A lookback is an alternative option if you think Maze User Testing is quite expensive for you, but look back has a different approach to Maze User Testing. Lookback focuses on qualitative usability testing instead of quantitative UserTesting. And also, Maze User Testing has a …
Maze User Testing is brilliant to test with a large volume of people and if you’re not after particular qualitative insights, like UserTesting would offer. The card sorting feature is basic and not as mature as Optimal Workshop would offer but it does the job and can be used in …
When looking for tools that could help us understand our customers better, we needed something that would be easy to use, had the functionality and flexibility of running multiple types of tests and exercises, and allowed our team to be able to do these tests quickly. Only Maze …
Figma helps to design and prototype out the concept but it does not allow to facilitate feedback gathering on a specific UI or even UX decision. That's where Maze comes into the picture with it's vaious features that helps to get the right insight to build a better product in a …
UXtweak has a more diverse toolkit and its learning curve wasn’t as steep. Moreover, UXtweak’s pricing was more acceptable to us and we felt it had a better price/quality relation.
Suited for: - I think that this software is a must-have for any experience or product designer that needs validation from any audience - Designers that rapidly prototype with Figma - Designers looking to establish an inexpensive way to deliver on user testing Less appropriate for: - If you are looking for a survey replacement this is probably not for you even though it does that quite well, simply due to the cost. Google Forms would be a more fiscal choice. - Marketing visual designers who are adept at visual builder tools (WebFlow, Divi, Elementor, etc) with A/B testing ability would probably find other products more valuable.
UXtweak is suitable for everyone, whether you are a student, the owner of a small or large business, or a professional UX designer or researcher. UXtweak will assist you in resolving any issue, large or little. You may test many components of the site using a wide range of tools. And, owing to its starting plan, it is accessible to anyone.
Maze is easy to use most of the times. It is easy to integrate with Figma, It is easy to find testers worldwide with required filters. Maze gives recorded videos which are helpful in debugging and understanding the problem with flows. A/B testing is easy to add and test. Overall Maze is very easy to use
When looking for tools that could help us understand our customers better, we needed something that would be easy to use, had the functionality and flexibility of running multiple types of tests and exercises, and allowed our team to be able to do these tests quickly. Only Maze could really tick all the above boxes.
UXtweak has a more diverse toolkit and its learning curve wasn’t as steep. Moreover, UXtweak’s pricing was more acceptable to us and we felt it had a better price/quality relation.
