TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

MiContact Center vs. Receptive.io (discontinued)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    MiContact Center

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ACanadian company Mitel offers MiContact Center, a call and contact center solution designed for both small businesses and larger enterprises. It comes in several different iterations that support various needs and use cases.

    $7

    per month

    Receptive.io (discontinued)

    Score8 out of 10
    N/APendo Feedback (or Receptive / Receptive.io, acquired by Pendo in 2019) was a SaaS product demand intelligence platform used to collect product feedback and feature requests from customers as well as internal teams. Some years after the acquisition, the product was discontinued.N/A
    Pricing
    MiContact CenterReceptive.io (discontinued)
    Editions & Modules
    Brightmetrics for Mitel MiContact Center
    $7
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    MiContact CenterReceptive.io (discontinued)
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    MiContact CenterReceptive.io (discontinued)
    Contact Center Software
    Comparison of Contact Center Software features of MiContact Center and Receptive.io (discontinued)
    Feature
    MiContact Center
    8.5
    2 Ratings
    0% above category average
    Receptive.io (discontinued)
    -
    Ratings
    Agent dashboard9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Validate callers8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Outbound response9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call forwarding8.42 Ratings00 Ratings
    Click-to-call (CTC)9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Warm transfer9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Predictive dialing7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interactive voice response9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    REST APIs8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call scripts8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call tracking9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multichannel integration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    CRM software integration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workforce Optimization (WFO)
    Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of MiContact Center and Receptive.io (discontinued)
    Feature
    MiContact Center
    8.6
    2 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Receptive.io (discontinued)
    -
    Ratings
    Inbound call routing8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Omnichannel inbound routing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Recording8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Quality management8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call analytics8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Historical reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Live reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer surveys9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer interaction analytics8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    MiContact CenterReceptive.io (discontinued)
    Small Businesses
    Zendesk Talk
    Score8.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
    Score8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Bright Pattern Contact Center
    Score8.4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    MiContact CenterReceptive.io (discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    MiContact CenterReceptive.io (discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Mitel Networks Corporation
    We used to have Cloudagent from Ozonetel and due to multiple downtimes and frequent disconnects, It is a good tool for a well-settled call center but is not suitable for startups due to high procurement costs. But the sophistication makes up for the lack of support from the team. The tool is absolute bliss.
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Receptive is very effective for multiple internal teams/department of a single product who need to scale their product feedback management effectively. We've been leveraging it for one of our products and it was so successful, that we implemented it with a second product. The main issue we ran into situationally with that was managing 2+ modules (products) in Receptive; it was a bit more difficult to present Receptive to two different customer bases/users (we couldn't change the appearance) and slightly confusing to do within the app (lots of filtering needed). I have heard that support of multiple modules is something that Receptive will likely be working on in the near future, so that's good news.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Mitel Networks Corporation
    • Call forwarding
    • Voicemail
    • Detailed contact list
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Captures feature requests from customers
    • Organize feature requests
    • Communicate progress updates to customers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Mitel Networks Corporation
    • Can be little economic
    • Hustle to find the right analysis
    • Support can be improved
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Filtering in general is not easy
    • I would like to be able to create a leadership priority dashboard
    • I would like to know easily when something has been linked to Jira
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Mitel Networks Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    I have not had a lot of contact with support, but when I do it's quick and accurate info.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Mitel Networks Corporation
    - Great Tool for contact center who would like to have all the processes under single roof - Premium features and best analytics to understand the process metrics - We have been able to onboard new joiner's easily without much support form the MITEl team and they have been working ever since.
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    We had UserVoice prior to Receptive but it was just too clunky and extensive for our needs. It was less about automation and still very manual work to process feedback. It also didn't provide collaboration levels that we needed for our internal teams to work together. ProdPad was a very clean tool but also didn't enable us to automate the process like Receptive does.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Mitel Networks Corporation
    • It keeps all side of our company connected
    • Helps facilitate remote work
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • We were managing these enhancements in our support ticketing system, using spreadsheets, and it was TERRIBLE. Being able to tell a user "Great idea! Submit it to Feedback!" has saved my support team hundreds of hours.
    • We have reduced incoming support requests when the request is really an enhancement - the ability to have a "Suggest Features" widget in our software sends users straight to Feedback.
    • Because we can make some fields required, we can cut down on the need to reach back out to our users for clarification.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots