Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V) vs. Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft App-V
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft App-V supports the virtualization of applications, making them available to end users without an installation.N/A
Parallels RAS
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS, formerly 2X RAS), is application virtualization technology, billed as a solution to extend the life of legacy OS (like Windows XP) with its virtual desktop for any device. Maltese company 2X Software developed the technology, but was acquired by Parallels (in Seattle, WA) in February, 2015 to extend their cross-platform support solutions.
$120
per year per user
Pricing
Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft App-VParallels RAS
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Considered Both Products
Microsoft App-V

No answer on this topic

Parallels RAS
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Primary objective is save cost. Easy to configure policy and has more security
Features
Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Application Virtualization
Comparison of Application Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)
7.6
3 Ratings
1% below category average
Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
-
Ratings
Application support6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Device support8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Ease of deployment10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Application packaging8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Security6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Small Businesses
Parallels RAS
Parallels RAS
Score 9.1 out of 10
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Score 7.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Nutanix AHV
Nutanix AHV
Score 9.0 out of 10
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Score 7.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Nutanix AHV
Nutanix AHV
Score 9.0 out of 10
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Score 7.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(3 ratings)
9.5
(153 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(22 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(31 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
4.6
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
8.1
(129 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(12 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
4.6
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(3 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Using Microsoft Teams for small or large meetings is a great way to communicate and collaborate. Microsoft Application Virtualization is a terrific tool for presenting and sharing information, and its storage capacity is also excellent. Installing and centrally administering specialized apps to control who has access to it is one of the features I value most about this software. It also provides a separate UI for tracking the app's accesses. This program is not suitable for freelancers or clients that operate alone.
Read full review
Parallels
Scenarios where time is a factor in having a solution in place and up and running safely and securely. Where there are older devices that ordinarily wouldn't be up to the task of running modern apps and services. Where users need to work away from the network, and security is a concern.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Install Software based on AD group assignment
  • Safely and quickly uninstall from devices
  • Updating is a bit more difficult but manageable.
Read full review
Parallels
  • The printing driver is quite excellent, both in the Parallels Client and on the HTML5 client.
  • Setup is incredibly easy; the default setup is very functional, and adding features is a breeze.
  • Speed is very acceptable in general for end-users, the clients adapt quite well to the amount of bandwidth available, and features are available to adjust further.
  • Automation through PowerShell is great.
  • Support is usually quite fast and efficient.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Unfortunately it will be replaced by MSIX
Read full review
Parallels
  • Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) continually improves the product but has broken some features recently. For example the web management portal lost the ability to manage user sessions after a major update. That issue was fixed in a later release
  • Multi-monitor support beyond 4 monitors (It does handle up to 4 -1080 monitors well)
  • More options around connection security and MFA. current options are sufficient but limited
  • We've noticed some performance issues with Windows Server 2019 and 2022. I'd like to see more robust support for remote applications running from those platforms.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Parallels
We have been using Parallels since it was called 2X - it is a major part of how we do business. It is fairly simple to use and maintain - staff like it, we like it. It is a product that makes a promise - and it keeps it. As Parallels evolves, and clean bandwidth becomes more readily available everywhere - it just makes sense to continue to use Parallels in our environment
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Parallels
Parallels RAS was easy to setup, with great admin guides and resources. We especially liked the included Visio templates which made diagramming much easier. The reference deployment diagrams also simplified our deployment process. Our end users love Parallels RAS. Apps launch faster than Citrix, and the Parallels RAS client is far more reliable than Workspace.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Parallels
If there are any issues with Parallels - they are usually more about the server operating systems than Parallels itself. It would be rare for us to have any reason to take Parallels offline - we schedule a reboot on the servers at 3am to keep the O/S itself fresh, but again - it is not a Parallels issue. If individual users have any issues we ask them to completely log out of parallels - which ends their session - and then back in - and that typically resolves the issue right away.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Parallels
I am giving Parallels 9/10 on this one because the only application that sometimes seems slow or has issues - is Microsoft Outlook. It is sometimes the result of a pop-up that may not show up in the published application (vs full desktop). Other than that - pages load very quickly - and it does not seem to slow down other applications that are running at the same time. Most of our users run Outlook, softphone and Teams locally - and published applications for everything else. When they do that - it is very solid.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
APP-V is no longer a supported technology and is on the way out, only on legacy support at this time. The changes in security emphasis in windows, as well as the changes in software development have meant that APP-V is no longer able to correctly package software. It has been superseded by the MSIX format and distribution via the Microsoft Store for Business.
Read full review
Parallels
Good support in place if required, very helpful when it comes to upgrades or any issues faced. The support team is knowledgeable, friendly, and quick to respond to issues The company also provides a range of online resources, including a
knowledge base, documentation, and forums, which can be helpful before raising a ticket
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Parallels
Documentation is fair but sometimes a little difficult to follow
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Parallels
Overall, it was pretty simple compared to most other projects. Again, we had a strong familarity with the product so there was not much of a learning curve. Our 'biggest' issue is the end-user understanding of a 'local' application and a published application. For example - Online meetings need to run locally for camera/video to work smoothly so opening a link to a meeting from a published application continues to be an occasional issue.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams is included in our current Office 365 product set; therefore, there is no additional fee to use the application. It saves our company money by not having to pay for Slack or another internal chat service. For us, Microsoft Teams has a better user experience and product features. Teams' usability is higher than Slack's since it has access to OneDrive, email, and OneNote applications. Screen sharing, chat, and file-sharing operate smoothly, and the performance appears great.
Read full review
Parallels
Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) provides the finest end user experience while being cost-effective and reducing administrative and support man hours.
Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) is platform agnostic; it works with various kinds of devices (computers, phones, tablets) and several operating systems (Windows, Linux, Apple, etc.), allowing users to access it on gadgets of their choice.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Parallels
We added our Integrated Services Staff to parallels, with filtered, published applications - in a single afternoon. We added licensing and installed the desktop client software on multiple platforms both in the office and at remote sites all on the same day - and got remote users that had never used the product up and running - very quickly.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Some applications may be slower
  • Interaction between several applications can be better
Read full review
Parallels
  • Our customers have had dramatic cost decreases due to no longer needing IT departments to work with our software.
  • We've been able to charge more for our hosting services due to our customers saving money in the long run. Parallels Remote Application Server has more than paid for itself, and the increased income has gone right back into the business.
  • Both our customers and our company have benefited from this transition.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Parallels RAS Screenshots

Screenshot of the console interface, showing Parallels RAS' support for on-premises, private and public cloud providers, including Azure and AWS.Screenshot of the Parallels Web Client, which is accessible from any HTML5 browser or choose one of the many local clients.Screenshot of Parallels RAS' integration with MSIX app attach for modern, dynamic app delivery.Screenshot of Parallels RAS' support for multiple MFAs for security and flexibility.Screenshot of the integrated Let's Encrypt security certificates, to issue and manage certificates in Parallels RAS.Screenshot of expression-based filtering which makes it easier to set policies in the Parallels RAS.