Microsoft BizTalk Server vs. SAP Integration Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft BizTalk
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
SAP Integration Suite
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Integration Suite is a modern, secure integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that connects applications, data, processes, and AI agents across SAP and non‑SAP environments.
$11,199
per year
Pricing
Microsoft BizTalk ServerSAP Integration Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft BizTalkSAP Integration Suite
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAccess to free tier services does not expire while there is an active Pay-As-You-Go or CPEA account with SAP. Once a free tier service limit has been reached users have the option to update from a free to a paid service plan in the same account.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft BizTalk ServerSAP Integration Suite
Considered Both Products
Microsoft BizTalk

No answer on this topic

SAP Integration Suite
Chose SAP Integration Suite
The best thing about SAP Integration Suite is the prepackaged content and ready-made adapters—they make setup so much quicker and cut down on custom work. Plus, since our team already knows SAP inside out, it’s a natural fit. We can jump right in and get integrations up and …
Features
Microsoft BizTalk ServerSAP Integration Suite
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BizTalk Server
-
Ratings
SAP Integration Suite
7.9
262 Ratings
1% below category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings8.3248 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings7.8213 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings8.2241 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings8.0219 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings8.2232 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings7.1239 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft BizTalk ServerSAP Integration Suite
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Boomi
Boomi
Score 7.9 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft BizTalk ServerSAP Integration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(7 ratings)
8.5
(303 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.8
(7 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(2 ratings)
2.1
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(3 ratings)
6.0
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft BizTalk ServerSAP Integration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
BizTalk is well suited as middleware. Where you wish to translate an input file into an output file and send it to some endpoint. In our case, we used it to convert and send files to SAP. In many ways, it very flexible, and you can do almost anything you want with it. In many ways, it's a better solution than your SAP XI or PI as middleware, since it's much less expensive, and allows you do interface with non-SAP systems.
Read full review
SAP
Good at: 1. Integrations with in SAP applications, especially with event based triggers 2. Can be integrated very well with other BTP services to attain Batch processing and store credentials 3. Supports many authentication models Improvements: 1. No version history available compared to as it is available in S4HANA 2. Need a lot of improvement in git hub connections
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • It is very user friendly. Users can change rules during run time and change workflow.
  • Huge capacity for queueing messages. It supports all types of adapters like Oracle, Salesforce, SMTP, FTP, etc. Also users can built custom adaptors.
  • If users want to dynamically deploy their solution without any downtime, this is a perfect solution. BizTalk will be a good fit, especially for public-facing websites.
  • Well-proven in the market. I used it when developing a website for Virgin Trains, catering more than 800K user requests per day.
  • Helps in load balancing.
Read full review
SAP
  • The extensive catalog of pre package integrations that have in the discovery center. That allows developers to find solutions that can fit the needs.
  • Monitor of the integrations and api deployed.
  • API management has been for us a very usefull tool inside integration suite, to be able to have the API Hub with the documentation of our apis.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Microsoft BizTalk is over engineered for some situtations
  • Microsoft BizTalk can be frustrating to use as it forces you to use the GUI as opposed to code
  • Microsoft BizTalk is very resource intensive to create integrations
Read full review
SAP
  • Provide more pre-built integrations to use within SuccessFactors or other modules instead of everything having to be custom built
  • Support is unable to provide advice on custom builds so you often have to engage a 3rd party partner
  • Works best when you have the functional and technical teams working together. Otherwise, the system is too technical for a functional user to create integration and a technical user not always understand the functional perspective
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
BizTalk will always be required at this hospital.
Read full review
SAP
It is in place, our system integrators are familiar with it, and it fits into the ecosystem. A better user interface, flow build and debugging experience would see it grow, many technical staff do not enjoy using it for this reason, however it is quite capable and powerful behind this one shortcoming.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
I gave a 7 because this product BizTalk does need time and training to get familiar with the usability and features, it is not that easy to use.
Read full review
SAP
The user interface is messy and not intuitive. It has a steep learning curve, and flows developed around are easy to make a mess with layout and can be difficult to follow. The debugging is also quite difficult, it takes some time to figure out how to follow the flow and examine data. Error handling is also difficult and not intuitive, it is better to let some errors leak and monitor through ALM.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
BizTalk Server has been supported for more than 15 years. It is well proven in the market. Microsoft has provided excellent support with technical issues.
Read full review
SAP
The support for SAP Integration Suite is satisfactory. We leverage SAP support through our manage services partner. So far, we have not had many major issues. One concern, to make our rating a ten, would be turnaround time on high priority incidents. SAP Integration Suite drives our key business functions forward. Without a reasonable service level agreement on turnaround, we sometimes find us running into issues running pay, etc.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Make sure you have everybody and all depts. On board during testing on test server.
Read full review
SAP
Work with an SAP implementation partner, if possible.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
BizTalk was selected here mainly because it is easy to integrate to a .NET application (most of them are Web Service, WCF SOAP, WCF REST and Web API) and many backend databases are Microsoft SQL Server. Another benefit is that the monitoring job is easy to set up and centralize with other .NET application monitoring jobs.
Read full review
SAP
Before deploying SAP Integration Suite, we assessed Oracle Financial Services Analytics and IBM Risk Analytics. While Oracle had proved its mettle in the exceptional database support and IBM in presenting risk model tools, SAP Integration Suite overwhelmed others by being effortlessly integrated with our existing banking framework.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • A positive impact has been the quicker turnaround time of a part request and that part showing up in SAP using Biztalk as middleware.
  • A somewhat negative impact has been the somewhat insufficient error logging/message capture settings that Biztalk provide. This has caused occasional delays when attempted to create parts for the business.
  • A somewhat negative impact has been the need to have a specialized developer who understands Biztalk to troubleshoot issues with the Biztalk and SAP interaction when creating parts, and when adding new fields to the parts.
Read full review
SAP
  • Positive impact would be availability of pre-defined integration content via templates.
  • One can re-use a template as a starting point to modify and adopt to client-specific integration flow.
  • Availability of adaptors and connectors, making it easier to piece together the integration flow.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Integration Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of