Miro is the AI Innovation Workspace that brings teams and AI together to plan, co-create, and build the next big thing, faster. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro's collaborative AI workflows keep teams in the flow of work, scale shifts in ways of working, and drive organization-wide transformation.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Miro
Editions & Modules
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Miro
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Additional Details
Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
I’ve mostly used simpler tools like Jamboard and basic digital whiteboards. Jamboard felt limited, and with it being sunset, it’s no longer an option. Miro has many more features and supports more complex work. The closest comparison for me is that it feels like Jamboard plus …
Figma is best only for UI/UX designs but miro is free form like very flexible to draw flow diagram for any kind of use cases with multiple component requirement as well. It is very easy to use for everyone and not only engineers. It is very easy to pick for every one to create …
I still use Figma when I need to collaborate with my design team, because that's where their data lives. I used to work for Lucid Software, so I started out using them. While I prefer their slick shortcuts for adding content, they did not have robust integrations, which is what …
Notion is okay for to-do tasks, but it has limits on how many blocks you can use, and is very templated in the plan I have. Miro, however, seems more flexible and open to not only to-do tasks but also other things at the same time. Canva is good for creating one pagers and …
Miro is much quicker and easier to use. I also like how Miro able to show more ideation visualization and research. Figma and Canva feel like they are specific to designing final assets. With Miro I am not designing assets to be exported, but using the space to ideate.
I have to admit here that I am currently switching to Figma for my single projects. I also did Group Projects there, but I do think that Miro works better in Groups. For me personally, Figma is better for working directly in final forms and ideation. On top, there's the …
Confluence Whiteboards:
It is like a cheap knock-off of Miro and a part of our Company uses it. It tries to imitate Miro but is way less user friendly and has way less features.
Miro is more powerful than these tools, has some cool features but it's not as good the way it's designed. In my opinion, the general usability is where it suffers the most.
I really appreciate that Miro is really non-designer-friendly which makes it easier to onboard onto and navigate. I do like Canva for more building more specific aesthetics and marketing materials whereas Miro is more for functional collaboration
Miro works on different idealogy and it excels if compared to Clickup. Clickup is more like tracker tool whereas miro is creative and collaborative thinking tool. Clickup doesnt have task flow diagrams whereas Miro work on visual thinking and design flows accordingly . Miro is …
Miro combines many of the most valued tools of these programs into one software. Miro also easily allows for collaboration which is more difficult with these other softwares. However, if you are looking for more specific and a wider range of tools for a specific task then Miro …
Miro is the best tool for remote collaboration; it offers features that make teamwork feel natural and engaging regardless of our location. All-in-one and most reliable for visualizing ideas and workflows. It allows everyone to put ideas on one whiteboard that is easy for the entire team to have access, comments, and give updates, which eliminates the back-and-forth emails.
Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
As a designer, I miss some more creative features. I can't even get really into designing small things (like paths). Many of my colleagues have already switched to the Figma board because it is possible there.
Things often get lost in the workflow, especially in teams. Working on the same file often leads to misunderstandings and can be frustrating. For example, if text is accidentally deleted and cannot be recovered, or if images become distorted.
The scale on the board is missing, which often leads to size differences.
I have advocate for the renew of Miro quite few times, however, it is not under my control as the decision is made in another team with their own budget. I would buy for my own entrepreneur projects (1-2 members) as I do know the value and work there 100%. So, I would pay out of my own pocket to get the value. However, If I wouldn't know the value it provides, it would be hard to decide with the current freemium features
I love it. It should perhaps even be a 10, but there are only minor things that get me when it comes to trying to move around the images on the page and selecting images on the page. Nevertheless, I've used this tool randomly over various years numerous times.
I only give a 9/10 because of the speed at which it loads. I have never experienced issues with Miro logging me out early, or some other technical issue causing the program to crash, or even it just loading in perpetuity without ever actually coming up (unlike other programs such as SFDC). It take a minute for all of my boards to come up after I click on it in my favorites, but besides that, it's all good.
Sometimes it gets quite slow and there is a correlation between this and the size of the board. Hence we are trying to segment the boards based on product stages or projects so that the size doesn't go big. When you go from discovery to delivery on a simple board, it will get large and difficult to load, even crash or go white screen
We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
I use both for different things really. Figma is better for design and prototype applications with coding being enabled in Figma (which isn't part of Miro's tools). As I said earlier, I use other programmes when there is a lack in Miro, in this case the coding element. Also Miro is better suited for BAU, so I can utilise this by bringing part of the business into using it. Figma isn't collaborative enough for this purpose. Miro overall has a better user experience
Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
