Monster vs SimplyHired

• Easy of use.
• Advertising for open positions.
• Doesn't force you to change your password every other month or so.
• Very logical layout of the website.

Read full review

• The post-to-hire time is significantly lower, which augurs well with our organizational requirements.
• It's very easy to navigate, quite user friendly screen and options makes it easier for posting and searching jobs.

Read full review

• Monster.com's interface feels a little outdated at times
• It could have strong filter options
• Easier ways to export resumes to CSVs, PDFs, etc.
• Ways to transfer mass amounts of candidates to other platforms

Read full review

• Although the sorting process is easy through SimplyHired when you check candidates to send a message, it un-checks them after the message is sent, so you have to go back through and re-check all applicants to move them. I'd like to have the candidates remain checked and highlighted after I send them a message.
• It would be great to have messages sent out automatically once we move them into new categories.

Read full review

• The visibility of the job postings when sponsored was enhanced and hence the chances of attracting a larger number of candidates went higher.
• The improved and the advanced filter options have paved the way for recruiters to find the right set of candidates for the positions available.

Read full review

• The job post-to-hire time is quite less which helps in effective time management and filling up the position in a timely manner.
• The candidate search options, almost always gives us the best fit for the open position. Thus, we do not have to spend more time filling up the position. This eventually helps in significant cost savings as one need not have to pay anything to any consultant to hire resources.

Read full review