Narvar, headquartered in San Francisco, offers their post-purchase oriented customer experience platform, providing shipment tracking, customer pick up options, notifications, and purchase return capabilities and features.
N/A
Satmetrix (discontinued)
Score8 out of 10
N/A
Satmetrix was survey-based customer experience management software. It contained summary and individual customer data for tracking the customer lifecycle. Satmetrix was acquired by NICE Systems in July 2017, and is no longer available.
N/A
Pricing
Narvar
Satmetrix (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Narvar
Satmetrix (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Narvar
Satmetrix (discontinued)
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Narvar and Satmetrix (discontinued)
Feature
Narvar
-
Ratings
Satmetrix (discontinued)
8.0
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Survey templates
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Themes
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Narvar and Satmetrix (discontinued)
Feature
Narvar
-
Ratings
Satmetrix (discontinued)
8.0
2 Ratings
6% below category average
Changes to live survey
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Question design help
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Multiple question types
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Narvar and Satmetrix (discontinued)
Feature
Narvar
-
Ratings
Satmetrix (discontinued)
8.0
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Survey logic flexibility
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Narvar and Satmetrix (discontinued)
Feature
Narvar
-
Ratings
Satmetrix (discontinued)
8.0
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Response tracking
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data export
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Narvar and Satmetrix (discontinued)
If you're not on a platform that has a branded post-purchase landing page or in-email estimated delivery date script, Narvar provides this experience. It's a nice-to-have for any brand that wants to provide a seamless, branded shopping experience for their customers. Narvar's grown rapidly and it seems they are increasing costs, which may be prohibitive and hard to justify for smaller companies.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Satmetrix is best suited if you don't currently use Salesforce. A lot of its main selling points are negated by the virtue of having Salesforce. Case management is in Salesforce, reporting is in Salesforce, the structure that NPX imposes is actually clunky and unwieldy, and is much more streamlined on competing platforms such as GetFeedback and SurveyMonkey. The only thing that leaves is the consultative service on being best practice and I don't really get to see any of that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Narvar offered us a turn-key solution that we had up and running in less than a month.
Narvar offered several out of the box widgets (solutions) to help build/customize content (calendar view, milestone icons, SMS messaging and personalize content based on items purchased).
Narvar's solution is scalable/expandable to include returns (once we are ready).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The previous experience was so negative that even if they have improved since then it wouldn't help. Another more pertinent reason is because we have an existing 3 year contract with Medallia. Lastly, vendor transitions in our environment (B2B in 132 countries) is extremely painful. I've managed two of them and wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Once it's set up, it doesn't require much support. We used to have quarterly or bi-annual touch bases with an account person to review our rating and customer usage but haven't heard from them in a while - either because we're too small or they got rid of this interaction. Can't say we miss it though because we can see our rating and feedback, and there is only so much you can do within the confines of the platform without adding on new functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
At the time, Narvar had no other competitors to my knowledge. We looked at building this functionality in house which had a 3 month estimate. Everyone involved happily welcomed the tool.
I haven't evaluated any other products. Our executive team selected NPS as the preferred measurement of customer sentiment and Satmetrix is the only certification company I am aware of.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info