TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Navan

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/ANavan (formerly TripActions) headquartered in Palo Alto offers their corporate travel management application of the same name, supporting messaging, travel rewards management, travel booking, and company policy compliance.N/A

    Zip Intake-to-Procure

    Score7.9 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.N/A
    Pricing
    NavanZip Intake-to-Procure
    Editions & Modules
    Navan Business
    Free
    Navan Enterprise
    Let's Talk
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    NavanZip Intake-to-Procure
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    NavanZip Intake-to-Procure
    Considered Both Products
    Navan
    No answer on this topic
    Zip
    Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
    Zip is by far the easiest to implement and configure, dramatically reducing the speed to value. Setup and creation of workflows to align with approval processes can be done within weeks and there is no limit to the number of approval flows that can be created. There are value …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    85%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    22 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    81%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    85%
    Happy with the feature set
    17 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    79%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    83%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    Features
    NavanZip Intake-to-Procure
    Travel Management
    Comparison of Travel Management features of Navan and Zip Intake-to-Procure
    Feature
    Navan
    1.2
    1 Ratings
    129% below category average
    Zip Intake-to-Procure
    -
    Ratings
    Customizable Approval Workflows2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Readily Available Support1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Travel Spend Reports1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Consolidated Invoicing1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Easy Travel Booking2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Travel Application1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Centralized Itinerary Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Collaborative Booking1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Loyalty Programs1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reuses Traveler Information1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    User-friendly Interface1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrated Expensing Tool1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Travel Alerts1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    NavanZip Intake-to-Procure
    Small Businesses
    Airbnb for Work
    Score8.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Lola.com
    Score8 out of 10
    Precoro
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Egencia
    Score5.5 out of 10
    GEP Quantum Intelligence
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    NavanZip Intake-to-Procure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (36 ratings)
    7.7
    (22 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.4
    (15 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    NavanZip Intake-to-Procure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Navan
    A specific scenario where TripActions was well suited was when I needed to book a hotel stay in Cologne, Germany for multiple colleagues. The fact that they were registered users made coordinating their stays a seamless process. I have not had an occasion where TripActions was inappropriate to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    Zip can be used for routing all vendor-level approvals for new vendors and all renewals across our organization. It can also be helpful for managing all purchases from existing vendors. For non-spend related approvals, it’s not as well suited. Zip was definitely designed for procurement workflows. They also have a vendor management portal that links up directly to something like NetSuite for management and visibility.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Navan
    • Provides a wide range of travel options within a wide budget.
    • It is reliable - if a trip gets canceled, they are quick to contact their customer and help sort out additional booking details to get you to your final destination.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org.
    • Visibility to the user in a great user interface
    • Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything
    • The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool
    Read full review
    Cons
    Navan
    • Limited partnerships with all the major airlines, or if so, slowly just adding more airlines to their platform
    • Not a lot of information about the ratings of the hotels. I have stayed in hotels that I probably wouldn't have if their information was more up to date
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • There are some duplicated fields such as anticipated total spend vs. price line item breakdown that asks for the same thing. This is a little bit tedious
    • Does not show which invoices got processed and applied to open POs
    • Does not integrate / migrate special custom fields within Zip Intake-to-Procure into other tech stacks (NetSuite)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Navan
    This decision overall isn’t made by me. The company evaluates the product. While I am an influencer the overall review is my personal opinion and mine only. The company books flights or would like for us to book flights through trip actions everything else is suggested but done with a personal cc which makes it optional. My option will be to not use TripActions for anything personally.
    Read full review
    Zip
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Navan
    - Easy bookings and quick expensing - Excellent chat support - Savings for the company since employees opt for rewards which require booking cheaper than average priced hotels - Rewards for employees - Easy to use customer interface - Great mobile applications for android and iOS - Ability to control payment methods for a different types of bookings like hotels or flights or car rentals.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    Incredibly responsive and helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Navan
    I like TripActions more because everything is on a mobile app that is super user-friendly. The customer service team is also world class-I genuinely have never felt so taken care of. More so, Concur Travel and Expense never rewarded me for traveling, while I made over 200 dollars in Amazon money just for doing my job.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level systems like SAP ARIBA or Oracle PeopleSoft, especially for smaller or mid-sized organizations with specific procurement needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Navan
    • The ability to change flights while I am on the road in meetings. They actually call the agents for me.
    • It has put money back in my pocket with the Amazon rewards and my company has saved money by me booking the less expensive options.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • Visibility for all necessary approvers and reviewers of the process.
    • Lack of open API to other systems (i.e Mondays, Smartsheet) is causing concerns for team that might want to move away from current tool.
    • No 3rd party implementation required is huge cost / time savings.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots

    Product screenshotScreenshot of Zip supports ultra-configurable, parallel workflows with our no-code configuration.Screenshot of Zip also integrates with all major ticketing, CLM, GRC, and ERP/P2P solutions. Here's an example integration card for JIRA.Screenshot of Zip has an optional vendor-facing portal for the vendor to provide diligence materials, including documents, surveys, and even bank settlement information.Screenshot of Zip's vendor-facing portal includes an optional bank settlement form with an attestation.