TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Navattic

    Score9.1 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Navattic enables go-to-market teams to instantly create interactive product demos. They help 150+ sales and marketing teams power product-led growth initiatives across the sales and marketing funnel. The solution helps users to: Convert Website Visitors: Drive more qualified leads with a new CTA. Engage Leads: Give prospects tailored product-led campaigns. Educate Prospects: Shorten the sales cycle and increase retention with proactive product education.N/A

    Cyfe

    Score4 out of 10
    N/ACyfe is all-in-one dashboard software for analyzing data from online services like Google Analytics, Salesforce, AdSense, MailChimp, Amazon, Facebook, etc, from Traject.

    $29

    per month

    Pricing
    NavatticCyfe
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Starter
    $29
    per month
    Standard
    $39
    per month
    Pro
    $65
    per month
    Premier
    $119
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    NavatticCyfe
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    NavatticCyfe
    Considered Both Products
    Navattic
    No answer on this topic
    Traject
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    NavatticCyfe
    Lead Management
    Comparison of Lead Management features of Navattic and Cyfe, by Traject
    Feature
    Navattic
    7.4
    8 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Cyfe, by Traject
    -
    Ratings
    Lead nurturing automation7.18 Ratings00 Ratings
    Lead scoring and grading7.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data quality management6.78 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated sales alerts and tasks7.98 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated follow-ups8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Lead segmentation and distribution7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Lead Management Integrations
    Comparison of Lead Management Integrations features of Navattic and Cyfe, by Traject
    Feature
    Navattic
    7.8
    8 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Cyfe, by Traject
    -
    Ratings
    Integrations with advertising platforms8.45 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrations with CRMs8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrations with data storage tools8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrations with lead automation tools7.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Conversion Rate Optimization
    Comparison of Conversion Rate Optimization features of Navattic and Cyfe, by Traject
    Feature
    Navattic
    7.1
    9 Ratings
    16% below category average
    Cyfe, by Traject
    -
    Ratings
    KPI analytics7.97 Ratings00 Ratings
    Drop-off analytics7.48 Ratings00 Ratings
    A/B tests6.17 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form Building
    Comparison of Form Building features of Navattic and Cyfe, by Traject
    Feature
    Navattic
    8.7
    9 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Cyfe, by Traject
    -
    Ratings
    Drag & Drop editing9.18 Ratings00 Ratings
    Branding customization8.68 Ratings00 Ratings
    Different question types8.68 Ratings00 Ratings
    Conditional logic paths8.87 Ratings00 Ratings
    Embedded calculations8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form templates8.77 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom code8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Web embedding9.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile responsiveness7.98 Ratings00 Ratings
    Date picker8.86 Ratings00 Ratings
    File upload9.45 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dynamic content9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Navattic and Cyfe, by Traject
    Feature
    Navattic
    -
    Ratings
    Cyfe, by Traject
    6.6
    28 Ratings
    21% below category average
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings6.817 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings4.028 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.120 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Navattic and Cyfe, by Traject
    Feature
    Navattic
    -
    Ratings
    Cyfe, by Traject
    7.2
    26 Ratings
    11% below category average
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.715 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.120 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings10.09 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings2.026 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Navattic and Cyfe, by Traject
    Feature
    Navattic
    -
    Ratings
    Cyfe, by Traject
    5.0
    23 Ratings
    49% below category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings4.015 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings4.021 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings6.89 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings1.017 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Navattic and Cyfe, by Traject
    Feature
    Navattic
    -
    Ratings
    Cyfe, by Traject
    7.2
    19 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings3.018 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.614 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Navattic and Cyfe, by Traject
    Feature
    Navattic
    -
    Ratings
    Cyfe, by Traject
    7.1
    22 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings10.020 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings6.314 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.416 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.76 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Navattic and Cyfe, by Traject
    Feature
    Navattic
    -
    Ratings
    Cyfe, by Traject
    9.3
    19 Ratings
    19% above category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings9.418 Ratings
    Mobile Application00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.713 Ratings
    Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
    Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Navattic and Cyfe, by Traject
    Feature
    Navattic
    -
    Ratings
    Cyfe, by Traject
    7.0
    7 Ratings
    10% below category average
    REST API00 Ratings8.64 Ratings
    Javascript API00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    iFrames00 Ratings2.05 Ratings
    Java API00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings5.94 Ratings
    Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings5.83 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    NavatticCyfe
    Small Businesses
    Dealfront
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Excel4apps
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Dealfront
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Jaspersoft Community Edition
    Score7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    NavatticCyfe
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.3
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (29 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.4
    (9 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (27 ratings)
    Data Sources
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.3
    (27 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    NavatticCyfe
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Navattic
    Navattic is a powerful tool for product engagement, backed by amazing customer support. Despite its many capabilities, it’s quite intuitive and smooth to use, delivering great value for its cost from the start. Demos and tours look polished and provide a refreshing self-serve experience to users and prospects alike.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Traject
    Cyfe might be for you if you are looking for a cost-effective way to display all of your marketing metrics in one place. If you are looking for a detailed, fine-tuned, niche, or extremely specific metrics, this might not be the best solution. Cyfe is good for a general health check-up of marketing, but not a finely tuned examination.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Navattic
    • Eye to detail on the visuals used whether modals, tool tips, different type of steps.
    • Voice over! Very good introduction
    • Easy to use, a plug and play kind of deal which I love
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Traject
    • Has preset metric groups that pull similar stats together in one "bucket" saving you the time of setting up each stat-line one by one
    • Allows you to easily adjust the timeframe for what stats you want to see, so you can find YOY stats or just last month's stats rather quickly
    • Colored visualizations of stats make it easy to notice when campaigns are taking off
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Navattic
    • Although I like the AI summarizations that highlight and add text in the proper steps, it still needs a human to review
    • Some features are hidden within another click like the next/back button or the beacons/highlights. Popular features shouldn't require too many additional clicks to get to.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Traject
    • I'd love to see additional functionality to customize colors. The light/dark option is very nice, but a little more flexibility in the colors would go a long way, especially if it was possible at the dashboard level rather than just the account level. Along the same lines, being able to customize the charts a little more, for example being able to show an x-axis on single data type graphs, could make them easier to read in some cases.
    • Being able to choose to report on converted clicks or conversions in AdWords would be helpful.
    • Needs the ability to show the date range on the shared URL dashboards. Would be even better if the date range was adjustable on that view, too.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Navattic
    No answers on this topic
    Traject
    It has become a part of our internal tools so unless a competitor comes out with similar functionality as a similar price point it is unlikely that we would not renew. One area that would cause us not to renew would be if a competing service came out with more third-party integrations that match our needs. Price at this point is no longer an issue as it would allow us to automate a somewhat manual process that we have now connecting Cyfe widgets to Google Sheets.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Navattic
    The tool is easy to use on it's own but the Navattic team is also phenomenal to work with. They have been instrumental in helping us get set up and confident in building our own demos
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Traject
    I gave it a rating of 7 because it does a good job at what it does, but there are missing that are missing which I would have benefited from. For instance, if I was able to drill down more on the specific metrics I was able to see, that would have been helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Navattic
    No answers on this topic
    Traject
    Because I had a very minor question and I was able to speak directly to the founder through LinkedIn and through email. I know that as they grow this may not always be an option but the fact that he made himself available to answer my questions said a lot about his passion for the product.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Navattic
    No answers on this topic
    Traject
    Cyfe is a 15 minutes implementation, then some time to get your data sources created. This is an easy one person job that will not result in down time or unnecessary wasted man hours.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Navattic
    Navattic was about half the price but not half the functionality. There are differences between the two but not enough to justify the price difference.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Traject
    The Salesforce dashboard is comparably flexible and intuitive, but designed more to its internal CRM focus. SumAll shares the social media dashboard capabilities, but lacks all others. Its interesting feature is side-by-side graph analysis for cross-channel performance. Cyfe might borrow from SumAll's default weekly email summary of performance from the dashboard, but implementation could be too complex. Nuvi dashboard is exclusively for social media marketing, but lacks Cyfe's flexibility for third party integration and window customization settings.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Navattic
    • Our demo hub is the website page that contributes and retains most traffic
    • Increased time spent on the page
    • Reduced bounce rate
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Traject
    • Cyfe allows us to provide real time data to our clients
    • Cyfe allows us to provide detailed analytics to our clients showing actual results
    • Cyfe reduced our need to provide monthly "reports" to our marketing clients
    • Cyfe allows us to have better situational awareness and know what is going on throughout our multiple organizations
    Read full review
    ScreenShots