Net-Results is a marketing automation solution that features segment-driven approaches to lead management and marketing automation. Some key features include support for A/B email testing, drag & drop landing pages, CRM integrations, and automated marketing workflows.
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
ReportGarden
Score8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
ReportGarden is a reporting and dashboarding product for enterprise ad agencies. According to the vendor, Reportgarden provides a
full spectrum of marketing tools that seamlessly integrate with the
workflow of an agency. 1000+ agencies use ReportGarden to
automate the most time consuming tasks like Client Reporting, Data
Dashboards, SEO Keyword tracking, PPC Account Health Monitoring etc.
ReportGarden offers Dashboards, CRM, Project Management Tools,
Analytics, SEO, Budget Tracking and…
$49
per month
Pricing
Net-Results
ReportGarden
Editions & Modules
One Price Full Platform
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Basic
$49
per month
Pro
$89
per month
Agency
$169
per month
Enterprise
$389
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Net-Results
ReportGarden
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Tiered pricing by total email sends or total contacts, you decide. All features included. No upsells or limitations based on your price.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Net-Results
ReportGarden
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Net-Results and ReportGarden
Feature
Net-Results
7.1
23 Ratings
9% below category average
ReportGarden
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG email editor
7.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic content
7.214 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
7.311 Ratings
00 Ratings
Landing pages
7.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B testing
6.311 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization
5.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
8.023 Ratings
00 Ratings
List management
7.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
8.618 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Net-Results and ReportGarden
Feature
Net-Results
7.6
20 Ratings
4% below category average
ReportGarden
-
Ratings
Lead nurturing automation
8.518 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
8.418 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality management
5.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
8.616 Ratings
00 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Net-Results and ReportGarden
Feature
Net-Results
7.5
15 Ratings
1% below category average
ReportGarden
-
Ratings
Calendaring
7.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
7.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Net-Results and ReportGarden
Feature
Net-Results
6.9
7 Ratings
9% below category average
ReportGarden
-
Ratings
Social sharing and campaigns
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social profile integration
6.77 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Net-Results and ReportGarden
Feature
Net-Results
6.3
22 Ratings
17% below category average
ReportGarden
-
Ratings
Dashboards
7.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Net-Results and ReportGarden
Net-Results is very well-suited for small, medium and large businesses. They seem to be more advanced than what a typical enterprise level implementation would require. When selecting a marketing automation provider make it a point to find out the level of integration with Salesforce and other marketing technologies. Do they have pre-built automation modules or does it require building from the ground up? Also ask questions regarding its specific capabilities ... for example: is it a marketing automation provider? is it a CRM provider? etc
ReportGarden works really well for us because it takes the human element out of creating reports. We can automate monthly, weekly, even daily reports and send them directly to clients without any direct intervention. This saves us a ton of time we can use to analyze reports instead of format them.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Cross-platform reporting all in one place; this is a strength because there are very few tools that offer this.
Easy-to-use platform layout - everything is clean cut and simple; this is a strength because many other tools out there are complicated and don't look great.
Built well for agencies, and organizations where there are multiple users, and/or multiple clients; this is a strength, because this is ideal for agencies such as ours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Net Results is pretty easy to use and understand. I wouldn't say that it is the best in comparison to MailChimp's drag and drop email builder, but Net Results do so much more than MailChimp that it is hard to even compare the two. Overall Net Results has good usability
We've used ClickDimensions and Marketo. We felt that ClickDimensions was more limited as far as creating effective email campaigns and not as easy to use. It also is completely native to Dynamics CRM, which can be a positive and a negative. Marketo was the previous solution we owned, we are much happier with Net-Results. It's easier to use, not as complex and there is much better communication from their support team. When looking at a new solution we also looked at Act-On and Hubspot. Act-On probably would've been our second choice, but it didn't have as modern of a feel and wasn't quite as easy to use. Hubspot didn't really fit our business. It was very focused on SEO and blog posts. It didn't have the features we needed from a marketing standpoint
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Kissmetrics offers a great product, but it can also be painfully expensive. We love the product they're able to provide, but when it came to overhead costs, it didn't make sense for us. ReportGarden is far less expensive and seems to deliver more value, so the decision to go with them was pretty easy. We've upgraded tiers to accommodate more clients a few times and still pay less than Kissmetrics' bottom tier.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Stronger re-engagement rates - The buy cycle for our product can be very long. Net-Results helps us keep in touch with prospects that may have gone cold.
Better asset utilization - Net-Results helps us drive continuous utilization of our assets.
Efficiency - The automation Net-Results has provided means we can focus on other tasks, like creating new assets or building new partnerships.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info