Notion aims to present users with an all-in-one workspace — for notes, tasks, wikis, and databases, from Notion Labs in San Francisco.
$5
per month per user
ServiceNow IT Service Management
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Built on the ServiceNow Now Platform, the IT Service Management bundle provides an agent workspace with knowledge management, and modules supporting issue tracking and problem resolution, change, release and configuration management.
N/A
Pricing
Notion
ServiceNow IT Service Management
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Plus
$12
per month per user
Business
$24
per month per user
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
ITSM Standard
Custom Quote
ITSM Pro
Custom Quote
ITSM Enterprise
Custom Quote
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Notion
ServiceNow IT Service Management
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
A discount is offered for annual billing.
ITSM Pro and ITSM Enterprise also are available with optional "Plus" add-ons. These include AI Agents, an AI Agent Studio, and other features that augment the capabilities of the platform using AI Virtual Agents to automate tasks.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Notion
ServiceNow IT Service Management
Features
Notion
ServiceNow IT Service Management
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Notion
7.3
79 Ratings
6% below category average
ServiceNow IT Service Management
-
Ratings
Task Management
8.174 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
6.846 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
6.957 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
6.455 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.372 Ratings
00 Ratings
Search
8.075 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
7.968 Ratings
00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Notion
7.8
76 Ratings
2% below category average
ServiceNow IT Service Management
-
Ratings
Chat
6.329 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications
7.568 Ratings
00 Ratings
Discussions
7.349 Ratings
00 Ratings
Surveys
6.720 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
8.869 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
8.98 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Notion
8.1
76 Ratings
1% above category average
ServiceNow IT Service Management
-
Ratings
Versioning
7.657 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video files
7.649 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio files
7.443 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document collaboration
8.571 Ratings
00 Ratings
Access control
8.271 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced security features
7.351 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive
9.213 Ratings
00 Ratings
Device sync
9.253 Ratings
00 Ratings
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Notion
-
Ratings
ServiceNow IT Service Management
9.0
69 Ratings
9% above category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets
00 Ratings
9.468 Ratings
Expert directory
00 Ratings
8.552 Ratings
Service restoration
00 Ratings
8.557 Ratings
Self-service tools
00 Ratings
9.466 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
00 Ratings
9.064 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
00 Ratings
9.561 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards
00 Ratings
8.663 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
Notion
-
Ratings
ServiceNow IT Service Management
9.2
62 Ratings
10% above category average
Configuration mangement
00 Ratings
8.561 Ratings
Asset management dashboard
00 Ratings
9.160 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement
00 Ratings
10.053 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
If you want a customizable solution that can be adapted for just about any scenario, I recommend using Notion. If you need a solution that's easy to share with people outside your organization, Notion is great and allows individual or team permission-setting. If you want a turnkey solution, Notion might not be the best since it requires a fair bit of set-up. There are templates that can be purchased to handle this, but I haven't found them very helpful.
In our organization, we are using ServiceNow extensively. Change Management, Incident Management, Problem Management, Time tracking are few modules which we use extensively. This sort of model will work for any product or service based companies as the product is built on ITIL framework. So this product will be suited for small or large scale companies to better organize and add controls and track SLA's for technology or business process.
When I have a number of requests to make, for example a request to add a dozen or so user accounts to more than one group account in Active Directory , I can put all the needed information into the initial form, add it to my "shopping cart" and all of that information remains on the screen for the next item for which I only need to edit a few items (like the AD group name in this example), and keep adding them to the shopping cart until I have them all. When I "Check Out" each of those items is generated as a separate task under the one request. It simplifies and expedites the creation and tracking of these kinds of requests.
I can easily and quickly see what tickets are currently assigned to me in order to prioritize them and remain aware of my workload.
Numerous fields for CIs can be used when trying to find the entry for a particular item. For example, IP Address, server name, raw text, classification, and so on.
To help with making sense out of related tasks, when a task is assigned to me and I need to open another task for a different team to work in order to complete my task, I can open a sub-task from my ticket so that the relationship between the two can be pulled up later into reports. For example, I may have a task to build a new vm, and need to open tasks for networking, security accounts, software installation and so on. By opening sub-tasks from my assignment, the time spent by all parties concerned is tied together for more meaningful cost accounting.
I use Notion on my personal tablet, and unlike on the computer, I have a lot of difficulty editing backgrounds, GIFs, and page dividers. It's not as user-friendly, and often the elements end up cut off or misaligned, which is frustrating.
While the current calendar feature is helpful, I'd love to see more customization options. The Google Calendar style isn't always ideal, especially for tasks without specific times or for ongoing projects that require daily maintenance.
It would be fantastic to have more flexibility in customizing Notion pages. For example, I'd love to create planners with the freedom to add illustration boxes, stickers, or GIFs without being restricted to a fixed layout.
It is hard to find areas for improvement, the tool is very powerful. That said, building the CMDB still involves some manual interaction which was not how it was presented in demos.
The CMDB data is almost too deep and detailed. When you build the relationship map it can be so large that it is overwhelming. You can limit this, but the default maps are massive if you are discovering lots of device classes.
The product is expensive. Since they are the leader in the industry and the product has tons of features, they definitely charge for it!
To be completely honest setting up a new ticketing system can be a pain in the ass. Once you have it setup and customized the way you want it, you don't want to switch unless you're unhappy with the product. Unless future releases and updates really muck the system up, I wouldn't change.
Very easy to use (I learned how to use everything on my own) and I was able to set up an entire ecosystem without any courses or other tools. I often say that Notion is like Lego for adults, because there we can use all the available tools to create a multitude of things, from funnels to projects with calculated deadlines and tags.
The dashboard is so confusing, [there are] many clicks to open a task and search by a ticket. The Enterprise customisation [we did] has finished to kill the software and creates a really bad experience on a daily basis. [It is] So slow, and so many clicks to process a ticket. Works only on IE so, that [should] make you realize that [it] is a bad idea.
I would give it this rating because we have had no major issues with the support for ServiceNow after we implemented it at our organization. They seem to respond promptly and efficiently if we ever do need to open a support case with them about an issue we are having.
To type in what should be a text box, you have to click an empty cell, a tiny text box pop up opens with a check box and an X. You the. Type in the text box and have to click the check mark. If you have a bunch of fields to fill out, doing this is very annoying. Absolutely know thought went in to this. I'm sure somebody in marketing thought it was a good idea. It wasn't.
Without exception, every client I have worked with has been very happy with their resulting product. While this is partly due to my work, I must point out that the platform is the winning decision, not the implementer.
The company uses both Notion and Trello within the company. Notion is more for North America employees while Trello is used between Operation team overseas and in North America. Sometimes it's a preference of how the tools look like for project management. I would say both Notion and Trello are nice tools and serves our needs.
We used to use Jira to handle service tickets but it's way too robust for something this straightforward. Due to the nature of Jira, you needed to already have a lot of documentation and knowledge about who should be assigned the ticket, so the lift of creating a ticket was time consuming.
Overall ServiceNow has a positive impact on getting the SLA of tickets down in supporting our customers.
One negative impact has been the amount of time to get the product to produce an ROI, it's almost too big to fail and too big to replace. You almost become committed to the product. Good or bad.
Another negative impact would be if you track metrics of employees and time tracking, there is a lot of scenarios where engineers will track time on tickets but not get credit for closing them as the assignee function of tickets can only be tied to one user and credits only the engineer who closes the ticket.
Another positive impact would be the level of security for permissions and scaling the workloads is robust and you will get out of the system what your team is willing to put in.