Nuclino vs. Teamleader

Nuclino is suitable for just about any company. It is intuitive and helps keep any company organized.

Incentivized

It is great for making proposals, sending invoices and for keeping time. It is also a great CRM tool. I love the business card scanner in the app.

Incentivized

• Workspaces are helpful to segment information.
• Being able to download files directly from Nuclino is useful.
• Having the ability to link to external docs is useful.

Incentivized

• Comply clients data
• Invoices
• Track and measure time for projects

Incentivized

• No real offline use is possible.
• For small teams it's ok, but pricing is too high if lots of employees need to work with it.

Incentivized

• Synching contacts between iPhone and Teamleader could be easier.
• Integration with Aweber would be great.

Incentivized

I love Nuclino's usability. The layout is clean, simple, easy to follow, and bright. I like that there is a read-only account option so that less-tech savvy people can still use it and they won't need to worry about deleting key information from the database. Similarly, I like the features that allow multiple contributors to have the same features to edit.

Incentivized

Besides having some tools to improve, it's a simple yet useful tool to organize data in order to improve patients quality and internal development.

Incentivized

The Nuclino knowledge base is good. Most answers to your questions can be found there. I didn't need to contact support at all.

Incentivized

Very effective team. If ANYTHING occurs their assistance is pretty much immediate. They take longer by email but it works everytime.

Incentivized

Nuclino is the clear winner when it comes to ease of use for both the administrator and user. Less setup time and less "training" time. The streamlined interface is quick and intuitive to learn and is not cluttered as compared to Confluence. Every tool you need to use to create a page or administer the workspace is available immediately on screen or by right-clicking. In contrast, Confluence buries many tools in administrative interfaces and only allows use of some features once you make several clicks to include a "macro" or "plug-in". We use both tools and I get complaints constantly from my team about how complicated Confluence can get just to author a quick page.

Incentivized

Act-On I used for a client. It is more a marketing automation tool than a CRM solution and it is also more suited for bigger organizations.

Incentivized

• Having a central documentation allowed users to find data more quickly, which resulted in 50% less "question" type bugs that would appear in our queue.
• Collaborating documentation before development resulted in less bugs; this is part process but the ease of sharing and making related documentation easy to access encouraged users into adapting the process.
• Increased use in documentation allows support response time to be higher for triage since supporting documentation is ready to go.

Incentivized

• Positive: invoices are easy to pay thanks to the direct link, invoices are mostly paid timely
• Positive: it is easy to monitor deals and proposals. When followed up timely, more opportunities become deals.

Incentivized