TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. Thomson Reuters HighQ

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Content Suite Platform

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AThe OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A

    HighQ

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AHighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText Content Suite PlatformHighQ
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Content Suite PlatformHighQ
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText Content Suite PlatformHighQ
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Thomson Reuters
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    OpenText Content Suite PlatformHighQ
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of OpenText Content Suite Platform and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    8.4
    7 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile support9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of OpenText Content Suite Platform and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Task Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Scheduling00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Mobile Access00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    Search00 Ratings9.62 Ratings
    Visual planning tools00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of OpenText Content Suite Platform and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.6
    2 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Chat00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Notifications00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Discussions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Surveys00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of OpenText Content Suite Platform and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    9.4
    2 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Versioning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Video files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Audio files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Document collaboration00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
    Access control00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
    Advanced security features00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Content Suite PlatformHighQ
    Small Businesses
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Content Suite PlatformHighQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (9 ratings)
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Content Suite PlatformHighQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Great for content management and records even for organizations whose staff are not much experienced in the technical backgrounds as it's easy to use and no previous knowledge on HTML is required. It is great for storing invoices and payment proofs and for organizations dealing with global clients for general use documents.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Document Management is being done well since it allows you to put in a corporate folder structure that applies to the business unit you currently work in.
    • Records Management works well in this organisation as it allows you to classify the document according to the file plan, as well as manage it according to the retention schedule for tat file plan.
    • The ability to collaborate on files works really well. You can share with users within your group, as well as allow other users access to the files for either read access to read/write access.
    • Access control of the folder and even individual files allows you to ensure only necessary people can have the right type of access. This is especially welcome in the government environment where document management is of utmost importance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
    • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
    • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • The user interface and configurability of that interface lack a lot of flexibility and modern tools.
    • There needs to be stronger and more powerful integration to electronic forms and workflow capabilities which are core to modern ECM.
    • Management of audit and content history needs to be modernized and made more dynamic and sustainable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    The staff is comfortable with it and I doubt they'd change at this point.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    OpenText
    Strong for Core Content and Records Management
    Effective for Non-Technical Users (with the right configuration)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    OpenText
    I never had any issues with access internally or via VPN. But, the response via VPN, was a bit slow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    OpenText
    • I used OpenText nearly every day and I never had any performance issues that I can recall. That said, it's not terribly fast either.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    OpenText has an outstanding support and knowledge base. All problems which couldn't be solved by us (high complexity cases) were promptly resolved and the resolution also shared with us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    OpenText
    No, it's pretty easy to implement and use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    Having used OpenText Content Suite for a long time, I can say it stands the competition. It offers many versions which is unlike many products in its category. Also, while it is not affordable, I believe the cost is justified considering what a business can achieve with this software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • With OpenText Content Suite, we can easily keep documents safe
    • Document collaboration is easy with OpenText
    • We can easily handle invoicing and automation thanks to features such as content capture and imaging.
    • With OpenText Content Suite, there is better file sync and archiving
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
    • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
    • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots