Likelihood to Recommend Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
Read full review WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
Read full review Pros Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds. Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum. Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism. Read full review It provided one single repository with a URL link to access each AP invoice. It gives a life cycle to each invoice where a business user can perform some additional indexing as per their needs. It also provides a reporting feature and a front-end for users to view invoices with ease and very helpful for auditing purpose. It uses the BPEL engine to customize the life cycle and also it can automate the auto entry of supplier invoices in your EBS system. Reduce a lot of manual efforts, manual errors and workforce. Read full review Cons WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved. EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best. Read full review Some functionality you would expect to be built-in (such as reporting for compliance) is not and requires other Oracle products to be integrated. Separating an invoice with multiple lines for different departments is not an easy task. Read full review Likelihood to Renew Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
Read full review The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
Read full review Usability It meets all required functionality requirements -- but handles none of them in an exceptional manner
Read full review Support Rating Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
Chris McCabe Technical Analyst / Technical SME / Tech Lead / Business Analyst
Read full review Alternatives Considered At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
Read full review I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
Read full review Return on Investment After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business. It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use. Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort. Read full review We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%. WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices. WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry. Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document. Read full review ScreenShots